Replies: 3 comments 7 replies
-
|
I feel we ought to consider scenarios with or without Defender XDR and associated authorisation to be delivered to SOC teams. They are typically collaborating with 3rd party that need access usually to deploy / operate Azure logic apps. Clearly a separate subscription with SOC ownership is a better way. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi Jack I agree with the described permissions topic. However, I would prefer a dedicated management group for security that is consistent with the other landing zones of the platform. A purpose-specific management group. Greetings |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Closing as work now in progress and live |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello all, thanks for the replies and responses over in #1898
We have had some great insights, feedback and suggestions to the questions we posed. Below is a summary of those answers:
**Summary of answers in discussion thread, thanks to GitHub Copilot**
Summary of Answers to Each Question
1. Do we need a separate LAW dedicated to Sentinel?
2. Do we need a separate “Security” platform Subscription?
3. Does this need to be in a separate “Security” Management Group?
4. Should ALZ deploy anything Sentinel related? Or should it just provide placement guidance and platform pre-requisites?
What we propose going forward in ALZ in regards to Sentinel
Some notes on the proposal above
So what do you think?
Let us know in the poll below and then we can move towards taking action on this 👍
And as always, if you feel we should be doing something different then please vote
Noand let us know in a comment what you would propose instead. We always want to hear your feedback 👂41 votes ·
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions