Inconsistent Results of LSeg from LSM

[Runsong123]

Thank you for sharing this great project.

I noticed that the LSeg results are 0.5281 and 0.7612 for novel views in the original LSM paper, while the numbers are '0.4819 and 0.7927.' Could you please clarify the reason for this inconsistency? Additionally, I observed that the results for other baselines remain the same.

Looking forward to your response.

Bests,
Runsong

[npurson]

There is a discrepancy between our reproduced results and those reported in the LSM paper. Since the gap for LSeg was particularly significant, we chose to report our reproduced results for that specific baseline, while keeping the other baselines consistent with the original paper.