Relationships upper level ontology #1136
Description
In GMHO, we have "mental health intervention scenario" linked to "intervention outcome" with a has_output relationship.
Instead, in BCIO, the "behaviour change intervention scenario" is linked to "outcome behaviour" with a has_process_part relationship. A difference with GMHO is that BCIO also has the class "BCI outcome estimate", which is linked to "outcome behaviour" with a is_about relationship. We discussed with Robert that the "outcome behaviour" could be smoking, for example, but a 24% of people quitting would be "BCI outcome estimate".
I wanted to check whether the relationships are correct. Perhaps "outcome behaviour" should be linked using a has_output relationship. Alternatively, it may be that our class ("intervention outcome") is not equivalent to an "outcome behaviour", in which case having different relationships would make perfect sense.
Thank you!