Behavior import from Gene Ontology

[mayabraun]

Some imports from Gene Ontology have near-identical names to BCIO classes and seem to not be needed for the hierarchy, e.g.

GO versions:
behavior
learning
observational learning
memory

BCIO versions:

individual human behaviour
learning
observational learning
memory process

Regarding learning
Other GO classes (e.g. nonassociative learning and its child classes, imitative learning) have been imported, but placed within the BCIO hierarchy. As such, I think we can import these classes without their parents and place them directly within the BCIO hierarchy.

Regarding memory
I do not believe we further use this class in BCIO. We have a BCIO equivalent, and do not seem to have any child classes of memory imported. As such, I think we can just not import these.

Regarding behavior
Behavior (GO version) is also shown as a parent class of multi-organism behavior > interpersonal process which we import from MF, when I search on OLS. However, on bciosearch, bodily process is the parent for this class. I checked the owl file of both ontologies (BCIO and MF) and it does seem like multi-organism behavior is the only parent for both, even though we define a different parent in the MoA spreadsheet. I will split this issue here because this seems like an issue with the processing of the spreadsheet rather than a conceptual decision.