suggested change to contract content type field

[ericfg]

can we change the contract type field to a taxonomy/term reference instead of a select list?

this way we can all have our own list of contract types but still continue to share the overall content type structure/code/etc.

[MegaphoneJon]

Sure. Feel free to submit a PR, otherwise I'll handle this when I have a moment and update.

[ericfg]

cool. will try to submit something later in the week

[ericfg]

I've made a few other similar changes and will submit a PR soon