Skip to content

Conversation

@roberth
Copy link
Member

@roberth roberth commented Oct 21, 2025

Motivation

Make it easier to re-run a check if you have a bunch and it's not obvious which derivation name occurs in which attribute.

This also makes error (ignored) into normal errors when --keep-going.

Context


Add 👍 to pull requests you find important.

The Nix maintainer team uses a GitHub project board to schedule and track reviews.

@roberth roberth requested a review from edolstra as a code owner October 21, 2025 23:05
@github-actions github-actions bot added new-cli Relating to the "nix" command with-tests Issues related to testing. PRs with tests have some priority labels Oct 21, 2025
Comment on lines +831 to +835
reportError(Error(
"failed to build attribute '%s', build of '%s' failed: %s",
attrPathStr,
result.path.to_string(*store),
failure->errorMsg));
Copy link
Member Author

@roberth roberth Oct 22, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a blocker, idea:
Suggest nix check <flakeref>.<attrPathStr>

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

new-cli Relating to the "nix" command with-tests Issues related to testing. PRs with tests have some priority

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants