I am reproducing a surge free-decay test case based on a published paper. When I used OpenFAST v2.0.0, my simulation results matched those reported in the article very well. However, when I performed the same case with a newer version of OpenFAST, I observed a noticeable discrepancy in the decay amplitude, even though the natural period remains consistent.
To rule out possible input errors, I have carefully updated all input files to the format required by the new version. Therefore, I suspect that the discrepancy may be related to the hydrodynamic data files generated by WAMIT, which were originally prepared for the older OpenFAST version. Whether legacy WAMIT hydrodynamic files are fully compatible with the newer releases of OpenFAST?
If the issue is not caused by the WAMIT files,is there other possible factors that could lead to such differences in decay amplitude between the two versions?
Thanks for help.
