-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 42
Description
For discussion: what are your thoughts on returning different error codes? For instance, I can see utility in differentiating between hard and transient errors. I could loop on sending a message until success. If the send is failing because of a config problem, then it will never succeed (and loop needlessly).
I don't mind working on a PR for it, just wanted to know your (@Red5d's) opinion before going down this road. If generally "yes", could you help enumerate what error codes would make sense?
- 1-99: return codes passed through from
curl(e.g., 6 is "couldn't resolve host", 7 is "failed to connect to host", both possibly transient errors) - 200: PB authentication error
- 201: PB device error (not found or already exists?)
- 202: PB object-not-found error
- 203: PB other error
- 210: dependency error (hard fail)
- 211: configuration error
- 212: URL or email format error
- 213: file error (perms or not found)
Since the current method is to always return "1" if there's an error, I don't see backward compatibility being an issue here. Since man curl only lists up to 90 at the moment, it should be easy to start at 100; I chose 200 only to preserve plenty of room for curl's error-code expansion.