Skip to content

end-effector increments rather than the joint angles #57

@Yysrc

Description

@Yysrc

Thank you for open-sourcing such excellent work!
I noticed that in the RoboTwin benchmark, you represent actions as end-effector increments rather than the joint angles used by default in the RoboTwin benchmark.
Could I ask if this design choice helps improve performance?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions