Skip to content

Print Escrow Viewer to PDF – “Export Escrow Report” #61

@grantfox-oss

Description

@grantfox-oss

📄 Feature: Escrow Viewer – Export Escrow Report (PDF)

Product: Escrow Viewer (Astro-based dApp)
Type: Feature · Reporting
Difficulty: Medium
Track: Transparency · Compliance · UX
Repository: Escrow Viewer


📌 Overview

Add a PDF export feature to the Escrow Viewer.

When a user is viewing an escrow, they should be able to generate a structured, professional report representing the current escrow state.

This feature transforms on-chain transparency into an auditable, shareable document.


🎯 Objective

Allow users to:

Export the escrow currently displayed into a structured PDF report suitable for audits, compliance, or stakeholder sharing.

This feature must:

  • Preserve data accuracy
  • Preserve clarity
  • Preserve neutrality
  • Not alter escrow state
  • Not require wallet interaction

🧭 Why This Matters

The Viewer is a transparency surface.

But enterprises and financial actors often require:

  • Printable documentation
  • Shareable compliance artifacts
  • Offline records
  • Attachments for contracts or legal processes

This feature bridges:

On-chain state → Real-world documentation.


🧩 Scope

User Flow

  1. User loads an escrow in the Viewer
  2. “Export to PDF” button is visible
  3. User clicks
  4. PDF is generated and downloaded locally

No blockchain interaction.
No mutation.
No API changes required.


🔘 Button Requirements

Label: Export to PDF

Visibility:
Only when a valid escrow is loaded.

Placement:
Within the primary action zone of the escrow view.


📑 PDF Content Requirements (Minimum)

The PDF must reflect the current escrow view in structured format.

1️⃣ Report Header

  • Trustless Work branding
  • Report title (e.g. Escrow Report)
  • Network (Testnet / Mainnet)
  • Export timestamp

2️⃣ Escrow Summary

  • Escrow ID (contract address)
  • Description / engagement reference
  • Escrow type (Single / Multi-release)
  • Asset information
  • Total escrowed amount
  • Platform fee (if applicable)
  • Trustless Work fee (0.3%)

3️⃣ Escrow Status

  • Current lifecycle status
  • Dispute state (if applicable)
  • Release state
  • Resolution state (if applicable)

4️⃣ Assigned Roles

For each configured role:

  • Role name
  • Wallet address

5️⃣ Milestones (if multi-release)

For each milestone:

  • Name or index
  • Description
  • Allocated amount
  • Status

6️⃣ Footer (Required)

  • “Generated by Trustless Work Escrow Viewer”
  • Trustless Work URL

🚨 Important Design Constraint

This must not be a browser screenshot.

The PDF must:

  • Use a structured layout
  • Use a print-friendly light background
  • Maintain typographic clarity
  • Separate sections logically
  • Avoid dark mode artifacts

Think: compliance document, not UI capture.


🏗 Technical Approach (Flexible)

Implementation method is up to the contributor.

Examples of acceptable approaches:

  • Dedicated print layout + window.print()
  • Client-side PDF generation
  • Dedicated export rendering component

Evaluation will prioritize:

  • Output quality
  • Data correctness
  • Maintainability
  • Clean architecture

⚙ Functional Requirements

  • Export works for both testnet and mainnet escrows
  • PDF reflects currently loaded escrow only
  • Viewer behavior remains unchanged
  • No regression in existing UI
  • No dependency on wallet signing

🧪 Acceptance Criteria

  • PDF downloads successfully
  • All displayed escrow data is correctly represented
  • Layout is readable and professional
  • No dark mode artifacts
  • No UI regressions
  • No mutation of escrow state
  • Works in modern browsers

📂 Developer Workflow

  1. Create branch:
feature/escrow-pdf-export
  1. Open PR into main

PR must include:

  • Screenshot of Export button
  • Sample generated PDF (attached)
  • Short explanation of implementation approach

⭐ Nice-to-Haves (Optional)

  • Filename includes escrow ID + date
  • Page numbers
  • Structured multi-page handling for long milestone lists
  • Clear section hierarchy
  • Export consistency across screen sizes

🧠 Evaluation Criteria

Submissions will be evaluated on:

  • Data integrity
  • Structural clarity
  • Print-readiness
  • Implementation cleanliness
  • Enterprise usability
  • Minimal impact on existing Viewer architecture

🌍 Strategic Context

Escrow transparency is only valuable if it can be:

  • Verified
  • Shared
  • Archived
  • Understood outside the Web3 context

This feature makes escrow infrastructure legible to:

  • Auditors
  • Legal teams
  • CFOs
  • Investors
  • Non-technical stakeholders

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions