Optimizing Our Discussions: Guidance for Engaging Core Maintainers

[nearlyforget]

📣 Community Discussion & Maintainer Engagement

Hello everyone,

Thank you for the thoughtful discussion! We deeply value the community’s expertise and encourage continued peer-to-peer collaboration in this space.

⚖️ Our Engagement Policy

To empower community autonomy and effectively manage maintainer workload, our team follows a Rule of Silence in general discussions. We primarily focus our official intervention on Pull Requests and Issue contributions.

---

🚀 How to Formalize Your Request

To ensure your input is addressed promptly, please use the following channels:

• Feature Requests, Bugs, or Ideas: Please submit these using the provided Issue Templates. This helps us track and prioritize community input efficiently.
• Official Maintainer Review: If a discussion requires a formal answer, please tag the appropriate group in a new comment:
  • @Universal-Commerce-Protocol/maintainers — Core construct, schema, extensions
  • @Universal-Commerce-Protocol/devops-maintainers — Repository maintenance, tooling

Note: Explicitly tagging the maintainer group is the most direct way to flag a discussion to our maintainers.

We look forward to seeing your contributions!

[manzil-infinity180]

@nearlyforget do ucp have any community channel or call which is open for everyone to participate ?