results.json

{
  "agent": "opencode",
  "evaluation": {
    "identifier": "sst/opencode@5f7e1e0..a96365f",
    "repo": "sst/opencode",
    "from": "5f7e1e099b2b5786dd94a172c33d6997d54c215f",
    "to": "a96365fd81555a2967524930aeb949009008f9a2"
  },
  "model": "opencode/gpt-5-codex",
  "finalScore": 0.1234567901234568,
  "baseScore": 0.1851851851851852,
  "variancePenalty": 0.061728395061728406,
  "scores": [
    {
      "assignment": {
        "name": "api-signature",
        "weight": 0.2
      },
      "averageScore": 0,
      "normalizedWeight": 0.22222222222222227,
      "variance": 0,
      "judges": [
        {
          "name": "claude-4.5",
          "model": "opencode/claude-sonnet-4-5",
          "score": 0,
          "rationale": "The API signatures do NOT match exactly. Here are the differences:\n\n1. **Import location differs**: While both diffs import `DialogSessionRename`, the reference imports it at line 63 (after DialogTimeline), while the candidate imports it at line 69 (after useKV). This is not a signature issue per se, but indicates different code structure.\n\n2. **Command registration object signature mismatch**:\n   - **Reference**: The command object includes a `keybind: \"session_rename\"` property\n   - **Candidate**: The command object does NOT include the `keybind` property\n   \n3. **onSelect callback signature mismatch**:\n   - **Reference**: `onSelect: (dialog) => { dialog.replace(() => <DialogSessionRename session={route.sessionID} />) }`\n   - **Candidate**: `onSelect: () => { dialog.replace(() => <DialogSessionRename session={route.sessionID} />) }`\n   \n   The reference version has a `dialog` parameter in the onSelect callback, while the candidate version has no parameters (uses `dialog` from outer scope instead).\n\nThese are critical API signature differences. The `onSelect` callback has a different parameter signature (one parameter vs zero parameters), and the command object structure differs (includes vs excludes `keybind` property). These would affect how the code is called and what interface consumers expect."
        },
        {
          "name": "gpt-5-codex",
          "model": "opencode/gpt-5-codex",
          "score": 0,
          "rationale": "Mismatch: anonymous function assigned to `onSelect` for the \"Rename session\" command differs. Reference signature: `(dialog) => { ... }`; Candidate signature: `() => { ... }`. The missing `dialog` parameter changes the API signature."
        },
        {
          "name": "kimi",
          "model": "opencode/kimi-k2",
          "score": 0,
          "rationale": "The candidate diff has a different signature for the command registration object. In the reference, the onSelect handler receives a 'dialog' parameter: 'onSelect: (dialog) => {...}'. In the candidate, the onSelect handler has no parameters: 'onSelect: () => {...}'. This is a signature mismatch in the method parameter list."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "assignment": {
        "name": "logic-equivalence",
        "weight": 0.3
      },
      "averageScore": 0.3333333333333333,
      "normalizedWeight": 0.33333333333333337,
      "variance": 0.22222222222222224,
      "judges": [
        {
          "name": "claude-4.5",
          "model": "opencode/claude-sonnet-4-5",
          "score": 1,
          "rationale": "Both diffs implement the same logical behavior:\n\n**What both do:**\n1. Import `DialogSessionRename` from the same path: `../../component/dialog-session-rename`\n2. Add a new command object to the command registry with:\n   - title: \"Rename session\"\n   - value: \"session.rename\"\n   - category: \"Session\"\n   - onSelect handler that calls `dialog.replace(() => <DialogSessionRename session={route.sessionID} />)`\n\n**Key differences that DON'T affect logic:**\n1. **Import placement**: Reference adds import at line 63, candidate at line 69 - both imports are unconditional and execute the same way\n2. **Command position**: Reference adds the command as the first item in the array (line 194), candidate adds it later in the array (line 268) - array position doesn't affect the command's logical behavior when registered\n3. **keybind property**: Reference includes `keybind: \"session_rename\"`, candidate omits it - this is a configuration property that doesn't change the core logic of what happens when the command is selected\n4. **onSelect parameter**: Reference uses `(dialog) =>` parameter name, candidate uses `() =>` and references `dialog` from outer scope - both have access to the same `dialog` object and call the same method with the same arguments\n\n**Critical logical equivalence:**\n- Both unconditionally register a command that, when selected, replaces the dialog with `<DialogSessionRename session={route.sessionID} />`\n- The side effect (dialog replacement with the rename component) is identical\n- No conditional logic differences\n- Same inputs produce same outputs\n\nThe keybind difference is a metadata/configuration detail that doesn't affect the core logical flow of what happens when the command executes. Both implementations will display the rename dialog when the command is selected."
        },
        {
          "name": "gpt-5-codex",
          "model": "opencode/gpt-5-codex",
          "score": 0,
          "rationale": "The candidate implementation is not logically equivalent. It omits the `keybind: \"session_rename\"` property, so the command can no longer be invoked via that keybind. Additionally, the candidate’s `onSelect` handler does not accept the `dialog` argument yet still references `dialog`, which would raise a runtime error instead of calling `dialog.replace(...)`. These changes alter behavior compared to the reference implementation."
        },
        {
          "name": "kimi",
          "model": "opencode/kimi-k2",
          "score": 0,
          "rationale": "The reference implementation includes a 'keybind' property with value 'session_rename' for the rename session command, while the candidate implementation omits this keybind property entirely. This is a functional difference - the reference binds a keyboard shortcut to the rename session command, while the candidate does not. Additionally, the reference passes 'dialog' as a parameter to the onSelect function and calls dialog.replace(), while the candidate calls dialog.replace() without any parameters passed to onSelect. These differences affect the command registration behavior and keyboard shortcut binding, making the implementations logically different."
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "assignment": {
        "name": "integration-points",
        "weight": 0.2
      },
      "averageScore": 0,
      "normalizedWeight": 0.22222222222222227,
      "variance": 0,
      "judges": [
        {
          "name": "claude-4.5",
          "model": "opencode/claude-sonnet-4-5",
          "score": 0,
          "rationale": "\n## Integration Point Analysis\n\n### 1. Import Statement Location\n**Reference:**\n- File: packages/opencode/src/cli/cmd/tui/routes/session/index.tsx\n- Line: 63 (after DialogTimeline import)\n- Position: `import { DialogSessionRename } from \"../../component/dialog-session-rename\"`\n\n**Candidate:**\n- File: packages/opencode/src/cli/cmd/tui/routes/session/index.tsx\n- Line: 69 (after useKV import)\n- Position: `import { DialogSessionRename } from \"../../component/dialog-session-rename\"`\n\n**Assessment:** MISMATCH - Import is at different location in the file. Reference places it at line 63 after DialogTimeline, Candidate places it at line 69 after useKV.\n\n### 2. Function Call Location in command.register()\n**Reference:**\n- Line: ~195-202 (based on context showing line 192 for command.register start)\n- Position: FIRST item in the command array (before \"Jump to message\")\n- Code shows it's registered before the timeline command\n\n**Candidate:**\n- Line: ~268-276 (based on context showing line 265)\n- Position: AFTER several other commands (appears after dialog.clear() at line 267)\n- Code shows it's registered after other session commands\n\n**Assessment:** MISMATCH - Command registration happens at completely different positions in the command array. Reference adds it as the first command, Candidate adds it later in the sequence.\n\n### 3. Call Arguments\n**Reference:**\n```\nonSelect: (dialog) => {\n  dialog.replace(() => <DialogSessionRename session={route.sessionID} />)\n}\n```\nIncludes `keybind: \"session_rename\"` property\n\n**Candidate:**\n```\nonSelect: () => {\n  dialog.replace(() => <DialogSessionRename session={route.sessionID} />)\n}\n```\nMissing `keybind: \"session_rename\"` property\n\n**Assessment:** MISMATCH - Reference includes keybind property, Candidate does not. Also, Reference's onSelect receives `dialog` parameter explicitly, while Candidate's onSelect has no parameters (though it still uses `dialog` from closure).\n\n### 4. Execution Flow Timing\n**Reference:** Command is registered as the FIRST item in the command array, meaning it will appear first in any command list UI.\n\n**Candidate:** Command is registered AFTER other commands (after what appears to be a copy/export command based on dialog.clear()), meaning it appears later in the command list.\n\n**Assessment:** MISMATCH - Different execution ordering in the command registration array.\n\n## Verdict: FAIL (0)\n\nThe integration points do NOT match:\n1. Import statement is at a different line location\n2. Command registration happens at different positions in the array (first vs. later)\n3. Missing keybind property in the command object\n4. Different timing/ordering in the command list\n\nThese differences mean the feature is integrated at different points in the codebase, affecting both the import organization and the user-facing command ordering.\n"
        },
        {
          "name": "gpt-5-codex",
          "model": "opencode/gpt-5-codex",
          "score": 0,
          "rationale": "The new DialogSessionRename import is present in both versions, but the command integration does not match the reference. In the reference, the Rename session command’s onSelect receives the dialog argument and calls dialog.replace(...) with it. The candidate’s onSelect omits the dialog parameter and instead references dialog from outer scope, so the function call is not wired in the same way as in the reference."
        },
        {
          "name": "kimi",
          "model": "opencode/kimi-k2",
          "score": 0,
          "rationale": "Integration points do NOT match:\n1. Import location: reference imports DialogSessionRename at line 63, candidate at line 67 (different line numbers)\n2. Call location: reference registers the command inside the first call to command.register() at line 194, candidate registers it after several other commands at line 268 (different relative position in the array)\n3. Call timing: reference places the rename command as the very first item in the command list, candidate places it after at least one other command object\n4. Missing keybind: reference includes keybind:\"session_rename\", candidate omits this property\n5. onSelect signature: reference passes (dialog) parameter and uses it, candidate uses arrow function without explicit dialog parameter (different call signature)"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "assignment": {
        "name": "test-coverage",
        "weight": 0.2
      },
      "averageScore": 0.3333333333333333,
      "normalizedWeight": 0.22222222222222227,
      "variance": 0.22222222222222224,
      "judges": [
        {
          "name": "claude-4.5",
          "model": "opencode/claude-sonnet-4-5",
          "score": 0,
          "rationale": "This evaluation is NOT APPLICABLE because neither the reference diff nor the candidate diff contains any test code. Both diffs show production code changes to a React component file (index.tsx) that:\n\n1. Import a DialogSessionRename component\n2. Register a new command dialog entry for \"Rename session\" functionality\n\nThe reference diff adds the command entry at line 194-202 with a keybind property.\nThe candidate diff adds the command entry at line 268-276 without a keybind property.\n\nSince there are NO TEST FILES, NO TEST SCENARIOS, NO TEST ASSERTIONS, and NO MOCK SETUPS in either diff, there is no test coverage to compare. The task asks to evaluate whether test coverage was reproduced, but no tests exist in either diff.\n\nScore: 0 (FAIL) - There is no test coverage present in either the reference or candidate diff to evaluate reproduction of test scenarios."
        },
        {
          "name": "gpt-5-codex",
          "model": "opencode/gpt-5-codex",
          "score": 1,
          "rationale": "The reference changes did not add or modify any tests, and the candidate changes similarly contain no test updates. Therefore, there are no missing scenarios or assertions, and test coverage matches."
        },
        {
          "name": "kimi",
          "model": "opencode/kimi-k2",
          "score": 0,
          "rationale": "The reference diff shows a new command registration for \"Rename session\" with a keybind \"session_rename\" and a dialog.replace() call that passes the dialog object to the onSelect handler. The candidate diff registers the same command but omits the keybind and does not pass the dialog object to onSelect (it captures dialog from closure). These differences mean the candidate does not test the same scenario: the keybind behavior is untested, and the dialog parameter passing is different. Hence, test coverage does not match."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "episodes": [
    {
      "finalScore": 0.1234567901234568,
      "baseScore": 0.1851851851851852,
      "variancePenalty": 0.061728395061728406,
      "scores": [
        {
          "assignment": {
            "name": "api-signature",
            "weight": 0.2
          },
          "averageScore": 0,
          "normalizedWeight": 0.22222222222222227,
          "variance": 0,
          "judges": [
            {
              "name": "claude-4.5",
              "model": "opencode/claude-sonnet-4-5",
              "score": 0,
              "rationale": "The API signatures do NOT match exactly. Here are the differences:\n\n1. **Import location differs**: While both diffs import `DialogSessionRename`, the reference imports it at line 63 (after DialogTimeline), while the candidate imports it at line 69 (after useKV). This is not a signature issue per se, but indicates different code structure.\n\n2. **Command registration object signature mismatch**:\n   - **Reference**: The command object includes a `keybind: \"session_rename\"` property\n   - **Candidate**: The command object does NOT include the `keybind` property\n   \n3. **onSelect callback signature mismatch**:\n   - **Reference**: `onSelect: (dialog) => { dialog.replace(() => <DialogSessionRename session={route.sessionID} />) }`\n   - **Candidate**: `onSelect: () => { dialog.replace(() => <DialogSessionRename session={route.sessionID} />) }`\n   \n   The reference version has a `dialog` parameter in the onSelect callback, while the candidate version has no parameters (uses `dialog` from outer scope instead).\n\nThese are critical API signature differences. The `onSelect` callback has a different parameter signature (one parameter vs zero parameters), and the command object structure differs (includes vs excludes `keybind` property). These would affect how the code is called and what interface consumers expect."
            },
            {
              "name": "gpt-5-codex",
              "model": "opencode/gpt-5-codex",
              "score": 0,
              "rationale": "Mismatch: anonymous function assigned to `onSelect` for the \"Rename session\" command differs. Reference signature: `(dialog) => { ... }`; Candidate signature: `() => { ... }`. The missing `dialog` parameter changes the API signature."
            },
            {
              "name": "kimi",
              "model": "opencode/kimi-k2",
              "score": 0,
              "rationale": "The candidate diff has a different signature for the command registration object. In the reference, the onSelect handler receives a 'dialog' parameter: 'onSelect: (dialog) => {...}'. In the candidate, the onSelect handler has no parameters: 'onSelect: () => {...}'. This is a signature mismatch in the method parameter list."
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "assignment": {
            "name": "logic-equivalence",
            "weight": 0.3
          },
          "averageScore": 0.3333333333333333,
          "normalizedWeight": 0.33333333333333337,
          "variance": 0.22222222222222224,
          "judges": [
            {
              "name": "claude-4.5",
              "model": "opencode/claude-sonnet-4-5",
              "score": 1,
              "rationale": "Both diffs implement the same logical behavior:\n\n**What both do:**\n1. Import `DialogSessionRename` from the same path: `../../component/dialog-session-rename`\n2. Add a new command object to the command registry with:\n   - title: \"Rename session\"\n   - value: \"session.rename\"\n   - category: \"Session\"\n   - onSelect handler that calls `dialog.replace(() => <DialogSessionRename session={route.sessionID} />)`\n\n**Key differences that DON'T affect logic:**\n1. **Import placement**: Reference adds import at line 63, candidate at line 69 - both imports are unconditional and execute the same way\n2. **Command position**: Reference adds the command as the first item in the array (line 194), candidate adds it later in the array (line 268) - array position doesn't affect the command's logical behavior when registered\n3. **keybind property**: Reference includes `keybind: \"session_rename\"`, candidate omits it - this is a configuration property that doesn't change the core logic of what happens when the command is selected\n4. **onSelect parameter**: Reference uses `(dialog) =>` parameter name, candidate uses `() =>` and references `dialog` from outer scope - both have access to the same `dialog` object and call the same method with the same arguments\n\n**Critical logical equivalence:**\n- Both unconditionally register a command that, when selected, replaces the dialog with `<DialogSessionRename session={route.sessionID} />`\n- The side effect (dialog replacement with the rename component) is identical\n- No conditional logic differences\n- Same inputs produce same outputs\n\nThe keybind difference is a metadata/configuration detail that doesn't affect the core logical flow of what happens when the command executes. Both implementations will display the rename dialog when the command is selected."
            },
            {
              "name": "gpt-5-codex",
              "model": "opencode/gpt-5-codex",
              "score": 0,
              "rationale": "The candidate implementation is not logically equivalent. It omits the `keybind: \"session_rename\"` property, so the command can no longer be invoked via that keybind. Additionally, the candidate’s `onSelect` handler does not accept the `dialog` argument yet still references `dialog`, which would raise a runtime error instead of calling `dialog.replace(...)`. These changes alter behavior compared to the reference implementation."
            },
            {
              "name": "kimi",
              "model": "opencode/kimi-k2",
              "score": 0,
              "rationale": "The reference implementation includes a 'keybind' property with value 'session_rename' for the rename session command, while the candidate implementation omits this keybind property entirely. This is a functional difference - the reference binds a keyboard shortcut to the rename session command, while the candidate does not. Additionally, the reference passes 'dialog' as a parameter to the onSelect function and calls dialog.replace(), while the candidate calls dialog.replace() without any parameters passed to onSelect. These differences affect the command registration behavior and keyboard shortcut binding, making the implementations logically different."
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "assignment": {
            "name": "integration-points",
            "weight": 0.2
          },
          "averageScore": 0,
          "normalizedWeight": 0.22222222222222227,
          "variance": 0,
          "judges": [
            {
              "name": "claude-4.5",
              "model": "opencode/claude-sonnet-4-5",
              "score": 0,
              "rationale": "\n## Integration Point Analysis\n\n### 1. Import Statement Location\n**Reference:**\n- File: packages/opencode/src/cli/cmd/tui/routes/session/index.tsx\n- Line: 63 (after DialogTimeline import)\n- Position: `import { DialogSessionRename } from \"../../component/dialog-session-rename\"`\n\n**Candidate:**\n- File: packages/opencode/src/cli/cmd/tui/routes/session/index.tsx\n- Line: 69 (after useKV import)\n- Position: `import { DialogSessionRename } from \"../../component/dialog-session-rename\"`\n\n**Assessment:** MISMATCH - Import is at different location in the file. Reference places it at line 63 after DialogTimeline, Candidate places it at line 69 after useKV.\n\n### 2. Function Call Location in command.register()\n**Reference:**\n- Line: ~195-202 (based on context showing line 192 for command.register start)\n- Position: FIRST item in the command array (before \"Jump to message\")\n- Code shows it's registered before the timeline command\n\n**Candidate:**\n- Line: ~268-276 (based on context showing line 265)\n- Position: AFTER several other commands (appears after dialog.clear() at line 267)\n- Code shows it's registered after other session commands\n\n**Assessment:** MISMATCH - Command registration happens at completely different positions in the command array. Reference adds it as the first command, Candidate adds it later in the sequence.\n\n### 3. Call Arguments\n**Reference:**\n```\nonSelect: (dialog) => {\n  dialog.replace(() => <DialogSessionRename session={route.sessionID} />)\n}\n```\nIncludes `keybind: \"session_rename\"` property\n\n**Candidate:**\n```\nonSelect: () => {\n  dialog.replace(() => <DialogSessionRename session={route.sessionID} />)\n}\n```\nMissing `keybind: \"session_rename\"` property\n\n**Assessment:** MISMATCH - Reference includes keybind property, Candidate does not. Also, Reference's onSelect receives `dialog` parameter explicitly, while Candidate's onSelect has no parameters (though it still uses `dialog` from closure).\n\n### 4. Execution Flow Timing\n**Reference:** Command is registered as the FIRST item in the command array, meaning it will appear first in any command list UI.\n\n**Candidate:** Command is registered AFTER other commands (after what appears to be a copy/export command based on dialog.clear()), meaning it appears later in the command list.\n\n**Assessment:** MISMATCH - Different execution ordering in the command registration array.\n\n## Verdict: FAIL (0)\n\nThe integration points do NOT match:\n1. Import statement is at a different line location\n2. Command registration happens at different positions in the array (first vs. later)\n3. Missing keybind property in the command object\n4. Different timing/ordering in the command list\n\nThese differences mean the feature is integrated at different points in the codebase, affecting both the import organization and the user-facing command ordering.\n"
            },
            {
              "name": "gpt-5-codex",
              "model": "opencode/gpt-5-codex",
              "score": 0,
              "rationale": "The new DialogSessionRename import is present in both versions, but the command integration does not match the reference. In the reference, the Rename session command’s onSelect receives the dialog argument and calls dialog.replace(...) with it. The candidate’s onSelect omits the dialog parameter and instead references dialog from outer scope, so the function call is not wired in the same way as in the reference."
            },
            {
              "name": "kimi",
              "model": "opencode/kimi-k2",
              "score": 0,
              "rationale": "Integration points do NOT match:\n1. Import location: reference imports DialogSessionRename at line 63, candidate at line 67 (different line numbers)\n2. Call location: reference registers the command inside the first call to command.register() at line 194, candidate registers it after several other commands at line 268 (different relative position in the array)\n3. Call timing: reference places the rename command as the very first item in the command list, candidate places it after at least one other command object\n4. Missing keybind: reference includes keybind:\"session_rename\", candidate omits this property\n5. onSelect signature: reference passes (dialog) parameter and uses it, candidate uses arrow function without explicit dialog parameter (different call signature)"
            }
          ]
        },
        {
          "assignment": {
            "name": "test-coverage",
            "weight": 0.2
          },
          "averageScore": 0.3333333333333333,
          "normalizedWeight": 0.22222222222222227,
          "variance": 0.22222222222222224,
          "judges": [
            {
              "name": "claude-4.5",
              "model": "opencode/claude-sonnet-4-5",
              "score": 0,
              "rationale": "This evaluation is NOT APPLICABLE because neither the reference diff nor the candidate diff contains any test code. Both diffs show production code changes to a React component file (index.tsx) that:\n\n1. Import a DialogSessionRename component\n2. Register a new command dialog entry for \"Rename session\" functionality\n\nThe reference diff adds the command entry at line 194-202 with a keybind property.\nThe candidate diff adds the command entry at line 268-276 without a keybind property.\n\nSince there are NO TEST FILES, NO TEST SCENARIOS, NO TEST ASSERTIONS, and NO MOCK SETUPS in either diff, there is no test coverage to compare. The task asks to evaluate whether test coverage was reproduced, but no tests exist in either diff.\n\nScore: 0 (FAIL) - There is no test coverage present in either the reference or candidate diff to evaluate reproduction of test scenarios."
            },
            {
              "name": "gpt-5-codex",
              "model": "opencode/gpt-5-codex",
              "score": 1,
              "rationale": "The reference changes did not add or modify any tests, and the candidate changes similarly contain no test updates. Therefore, there are no missing scenarios or assertions, and test coverage matches."
            },
            {
              "name": "kimi",
              "model": "opencode/kimi-k2",
              "score": 0,
              "rationale": "The reference diff shows a new command registration for \"Rename session\" with a keybind \"session_rename\" and a dialog.replace() call that passes the dialog object to the onSelect handler. The candidate diff registers the same command but omits the keybind and does not pass the dialog object to onSelect (it captures dialog from closure). These differences mean the candidate does not test the same scenario: the keybind behavior is untested, and the dialog parameter passing is different. Hence, test coverage does not match."
            }
          ]
        }
      ],
      "usage": {
        "input": 1250,
        "output": 367
      }
    }
  ],
  "usage": {
    "input": 1250,
    "output": 367
  },
  "summary": "The agent successfully implemented changes to add a \"Rename session\" command feature to the OpenCode TUI (Terminal User Interface). The modification involved integrating an existing rename dialog component into the command bar functionality, allowing users to rename active sessions through keyboard commands.\n\n**Approach**: The agent made targeted modifications to a single file (`packages/opencode/src/cli/cmd/tui/routes/session/index.tsx`), focusing on two key integration points. First, it imported the existing rename dialog component at line 69 to make it accessible within the session route. Second, it registered a new command at line 271 that triggers the rename dialog when invoked from the command bar. This approach leveraged existing UI components rather than creating new ones, demonstrating efficient code reuse.\n\n**Key Actions**: The agent modified `packages/opencode/src/cli/cmd/tui/routes/session/index.tsx` by adding an import statement for the rename dialog and registering a new \"Rename session\" command within the command bar's command registry. These changes connected the pre-existing rename functionality to the command palette, making it accessible through keyboard shortcuts.\n\n**Observations**: The agent completed the task efficiently in a single episode with only 5 actions total. It provided a clear summary of changes, explicitly noting that no tests were run since they weren't requested, and proactively offered to run `bun test` or `bun dev` for verification. The implementation was straightforward and focused, suggesting the task was well-defined with clear commit references (5f7e1e0 to a96365f) guiding the changes."
}