New project shown as -1

[vladimirpetrov]

ISSUE TYPE

• Bug Report

COMPONENT NAME

UI

CLOUDSTACK VERSION

4.18 nightly

CONFIGURATION

N/A

OS / ENVIRONMENT

N/A

SUMMARY

When user switches to a newly created project from the 'Projects' page, it's shown as '-1' on the top bar.

STEPS TO REPRODUCE

1. Go to Projects and create a new project
2. Change to the new project by using the icon next to the project name (not the dropdown menu on the top).

EXPECTED RESULTS

The project name must be properly shown in the top bar.

ACTUAL RESULTS

Instead of the project name, '-1' is shown on the top bar.

---

---

[DaanHoogland]

@vladimirpetrov , I tested this with a 'main' environment from the 3rd and one from latest (yesterday afternoon) and cannot reproduce it.

[vladimirpetrov]

To reproduce it, it's very important to use the icon for changing the project, @DaanHoogland , as shown on the first screenshot. I tested it on 4.17 and we have the same problem there so this is not a regression for the current version.

[CharlesQueiroz]

Guys, I was able to reproduce the problem. And it happens because, after you create a new project, the project list that is located in the ProjectMenu.vue component is not updated with this new project, and the code below cannot find the project with the ID that has just been created:

cloudstack/ui/src/components/header/ProjectMenu.vue

Line 80 in e8b4911

projectIndex = this.projects.findIndex(project => project.id === this.$store.getters.project.id)

So, the solution is when the project is created, in some way (that I still don't know how), call the fetchData() function of the ProjectMenu.vue component so that the recently created project is in the list and JS doesn't return -1.

I tried to create a new global state called ReloadAllProjects and use something like (In the AutogenView.vue component):

And in the ProjectMenu.vue component:

But it still didn't work (yet). I'm not sure if I'm going in the right direction. Please let me know if someone with more experience could guide me if this type of solution is consistent or if I have to go in a different direction.

[CharlesQueiroz]

Guys, I made a PR to fix it: #7900

If anyone can take a look and validate, I'd appreciate it.

[DaanHoogland]

nice @CharlesQueiroz , thanks

[weizhouapache]

fixed by #7900