Skip to content

Conversation

@danilrwx
Copy link
Contributor

@danilrwx danilrwx commented Oct 30, 2025

Description

Use indexers for better performance. List on large size of namespaces drastically increases cpu usage, using indexers divide it by 2.

Checklist

  • The code is covered by unit tests.
  • e2e tests passed.
  • Documentation updated according to the changes.
  • Changes were tested in the Kubernetes cluster manually.

Changelog entries

section: core
type: chore
summary: add indexers for slowest client.List operations
impact_level: low

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Oct 30, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This PR adds a new indexer for VirtualMachine by IP and registers it in the global indexers list, refactors handler List calls to use MatchingFields for index-based queries to improve performance, and updates tests to use testutil.NewFakeClientWithObjects instead of manual fake client building.

Sequence diagram for optimized List operation using indexers

sequenceDiagram
participant Handler
participant Client
participant Indexer
participant VirtualMachineList
Handler->>Client: List(VirtualMachineList, MatchingFields{IndexFieldVMByVD: vd.Name})
Client->>Indexer: Use IndexFieldVMByVD to filter
Indexer-->>Client: Return filtered VirtualMachineList
Client-->>Handler: Return VirtualMachineList
Loading

Sequence diagram for List operation by IP using new indexer

sequenceDiagram
participant AttachedHandler
participant Client
participant Indexer
participant VirtualMachineList
AttachedHandler->>Client: List(VirtualMachineList, MatchingFields{IndexFieldVMByIP: vmip.Status.Address})
Client->>Indexer: Use IndexFieldVMByIP to filter
Indexer-->>Client: Return filtered VirtualMachineList
Client-->>AttachedHandler: Return VirtualMachineList
Loading

Class diagram for new and updated indexers in VirtualMachine

classDiagram
class VirtualMachine {
  +status: Status
  +spec: Spec
}
class Status {
  +ipAddress: string
  +node: string
}
class Spec {
  +blockDeviceRefs: BlockDeviceRefs
}
class BlockDeviceRefs {
  +VirtualDisk: string
  +VirtualImage: string
  +ClusterVirtualImage: string
}
class IndexGetters {
  +IndexVMByVD()
  +IndexVMByVI()
  +IndexVMByCVI()
  +IndexVMByIP()  % newly added
  +IndexVMByNode()
}
VirtualMachine --> Status
VirtualMachine --> Spec
Spec --> BlockDeviceRefs
IndexGetters --> VirtualMachine : uses
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Introduce new indexer for VirtualMachine by IP
  • Add IndexFieldVMByIP constant
  • Include IndexVMByIP in IndexGetters
  • Implement IndexVMByIP extraction function
pkg/controller/indexer/indexer.go
Switch handler List calls to use index-based MatchingFields
  • Replace ListOptions filtering by namespace with MatchingFields using indexer.IndexFieldVMByVD
  • Replace ListOptions filtering by namespace with MatchingFields using indexer.IndexFieldVMByIP
  • Import indexer package in handlers
pkg/controller/vd/internal/inuse.go
pkg/controller/vmip/internal/attached_handler.go
Refactor tests to use common fake client builder
  • Replace fake.NewClientBuilder calls with testutil.NewFakeClientWithObjects
  • Add error checks after testutil.NewFakeClientWithObjects
  • Update imports to include testutil and remove direct fake client import
pkg/controller/vd/internal/inuse_test.go

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@danilrwx danilrwx added the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Oct 31, 2025
@deckhouse-BOaTswain
Copy link
Contributor

deckhouse-BOaTswain commented Oct 31, 2025

Workflow has started.
Follow the progress here: Workflow Run

The target step completed with status: failure.

@deckhouse-BOaTswain deckhouse-BOaTswain removed the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Oct 31, 2025
@danilrwx danilrwx added this to the v1.2.0 milestone Nov 1, 2025
@danilrwx danilrwx changed the title feat(core): add indexers for slowest client.List operations chore(core): add indexers for slowest client.List operations Nov 1, 2025
Signed-off-by: Daniil Antoshin <daniil.antoshin@flant.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniil Antoshin <daniil.antoshin@flant.com>
@danilrwx danilrwx force-pushed the feat/core/add-indexers-for-list-handlers branch from e42aea2 to 40cabe4 Compare November 1, 2025 10:51
@danilrwx danilrwx marked this pull request as ready for review November 1, 2025 11:12
@danilrwx danilrwx added the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@deckhouse-BOaTswain
Copy link
Contributor

deckhouse-BOaTswain commented Nov 1, 2025

Workflow has started.
Follow the progress here: Workflow Run

The target step completed with status: failure.

@deckhouse-BOaTswain deckhouse-BOaTswain removed the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 1, 2025
@danilrwx danilrwx added e2e/user/Isteb4k e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author labels Nov 1, 2025
@deckhouse-BOaTswain
Copy link
Contributor

deckhouse-BOaTswain commented Nov 1, 2025

Workflow has started.
Follow the progress here: Workflow Run

The target step completed with status: failure.

@deckhouse-BOaTswain deckhouse-BOaTswain removed the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 1, 2025
@danilrwx danilrwx added the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 1, 2025
@deckhouse-BOaTswain
Copy link
Contributor

deckhouse-BOaTswain commented Nov 1, 2025

Workflow has started.
Follow the progress here: Workflow Run

The target step completed with status: failure.

@deckhouse-BOaTswain deckhouse-BOaTswain removed the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 1, 2025
@danilrwx danilrwx added e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author and removed e2e/user/Isteb4k labels Nov 5, 2025
@deckhouse-BOaTswain
Copy link
Contributor

deckhouse-BOaTswain commented Nov 5, 2025

Workflow has started.
Follow the progress here: Workflow Run

The target step completed with status: failure.

@deckhouse-BOaTswain deckhouse-BOaTswain removed the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 5, 2025
@danilrwx danilrwx added the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 5, 2025
@deckhouse-BOaTswain
Copy link
Contributor

deckhouse-BOaTswain commented Nov 5, 2025

Workflow has started.
Follow the progress here: Workflow Run

The target step completed with status: failure.

@deckhouse-BOaTswain deckhouse-BOaTswain removed the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 5, 2025
@danilrwx danilrwx added the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 5, 2025
@deckhouse-BOaTswain
Copy link
Contributor

deckhouse-BOaTswain commented Nov 5, 2025

Workflow has started.
Follow the progress here: Workflow Run

The target step completed with status: failure.

@deckhouse-BOaTswain deckhouse-BOaTswain removed the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 5, 2025
Signed-off-by: Daniil Antoshin <daniil.antoshin@flant.com>
@danilrwx danilrwx added the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 6, 2025
@deckhouse-BOaTswain
Copy link
Contributor

deckhouse-BOaTswain commented Nov 6, 2025

Workflow has started.
Follow the progress here: Workflow Run

The target step completed with status: failure.

@deckhouse-BOaTswain deckhouse-BOaTswain removed the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 6, 2025
Signed-off-by: Daniil Antoshin <daniil.antoshin@flant.com>
@danilrwx danilrwx added the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 6, 2025
@deckhouse-BOaTswain
Copy link
Contributor

deckhouse-BOaTswain commented Nov 6, 2025

Workflow has started.
Follow the progress here: Workflow Run

The target step completed with status: failure.

@deckhouse-BOaTswain deckhouse-BOaTswain removed the e2e/run Run e2e test on cluster of PR author label Nov 6, 2025
Signed-off-by: Daniil Antoshin <daniil.antoshin@flant.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniil Antoshin <daniil.antoshin@flant.com>
@Isteb4k Isteb4k marked this pull request as draft November 6, 2025 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants