- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 2.9k
feat: add type to issues #484
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
1cc956c    to
    e733f06      
    Compare
  
    | Thank you for trying this. I am concerned that there isn't a good story for how the LLM should discover what options are available for this field. I'd propose an enum, but users can add additional types so that would be insufficient. We will have to think about this. | 
    
      
        1 similar comment
      
    
  
    | Thank you for trying this. I am concerned that there isn't a good story for how the LLM should discover what options are available for this field. I'd propose an enum, but users can add additional types so that would be insufficient. We will have to think about this. | 
| I agree. We also might need to support  Supporting CRUD operations of IssueType would assist the model to discover the list of types and assigning them. | 
| 👋 
 | 
| 
 Maybe this one is ready to go now? | 
| Duplicate of #869 | 
Closes: #409