Skip to content

Conversation

@radar07
Copy link
Contributor

@radar07 radar07 commented Jun 5, 2025

Closes: #409

@radar07 radar07 requested a review from a team as a code owner June 5, 2025 17:32
@radar07 radar07 marked this pull request as draft June 5, 2025 17:33
@radar07 radar07 force-pushed the add-issue-types-and-pr-types branch from 1cc956c to e733f06 Compare June 6, 2025 17:45
@radar07 radar07 marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2025 18:52
@SamMorrowDrums
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for trying this.

I am concerned that there isn't a good story for how the LLM should discover what options are available for this field.

I'd propose an enum, but users can add additional types so that would be insufficient.

We will have to think about this.

1 similar comment
@SamMorrowDrums
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for trying this.

I am concerned that there isn't a good story for how the LLM should discover what options are available for this field.

I'd propose an enum, but users can add additional types so that would be insufficient.

We will have to think about this.

@radar07
Copy link
Contributor Author

radar07 commented Jun 8, 2025

I agree. We also might need to support IssueType in this server.

Supporting CRUD operations of IssueType would assist the model to discover the list of types and assigning them.

@tonytrg tonytrg added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 16, 2025
@akenneth
Copy link
Contributor

akenneth commented Jul 1, 2025

👋

  • This proposed PR adds issue types discoverability. Together with the PR proposed here it should add nice issue type support. Add List issue types tool #616

@akenneth
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe this one is ready to go now?

@JoannaaKL JoannaaKL self-requested a review August 13, 2025 08:56
@JoannaaKL JoannaaKL mentioned this pull request Aug 13, 2025
@dsyme
Copy link

dsyme commented Oct 26, 2025

Duplicate of #869

@dsyme dsyme marked this as a duplicate of #869 Oct 26, 2025
@dsyme dsyme closed this Oct 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for setting 'Type' field (feature, bug, task) in MCP

6 participants