v5.0.0 #308
oxisto
announced in
Announcements
v5.0.0
#308
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🚀 New Major Version
v5🚀It's finally here, the release you have been waiting for! We don't take breaking changes lightly, but the changes outlined below were necessary to address some of the challenges of the previous API. A big thanks for @mfridman for all the reviews, all contributors for their commits and of course @dgrijalva for the original code. I hope we kept some of the spirit of your original
v4branch alive in the approach we have taken here.~@oxisto, on behalf of @golang-jwt/maintainers
Version
v5contains a major rework of core functionalities in thejwt-golibrary. This includes support for several validation options as well as a re-design of theClaimsinterface. Lastly, we reworked how errors work under the hood, which should provide a better overall developer experience.Starting from v5.0.0, the import path will be:
For most users, changing the import path should suffice. However, since we intentionally changed and cleaned some of the public API, existing programs might need to be updated. The following sections describe significant changes and corresponding updates for existing programs.
Parsing and Validation Options
Under the hood, a new
validatorstruct takes care of validating the claims. A long awaited feature has been the option to fine-tune the validation of tokens. This is now possible with severalParserOptionfunctions that can be appended to mostParsefunctions, such asParseWithClaims. The most important options and changes are:WithLeewayto support specifying the leeway that is allowed when validating time-based claims, such asexpornbf.iatclaim. Usage of this claim is OPTIONAL according to the JWT RFC. The claim itself is also purely informational according to the RFC, so a strict validation failure is not recommended. If you want to check for sensible values in these claims, please use theWithIssuedAtparser option.WithAudience,WithSubjectandWithIssuerto support checking for expectedaud,subandiss.WithStrictDecodingandWithPaddingAllowedoptions to allow previously global settings to enable base64 strict encoding and the parsing of base64 strings with padding. The latter is strictly speaking against the standard, but unfortunately some of the major identity providers issue some of these incorrect tokens. Both options are disabled by default.Changes to the
ClaimsinterfaceComplete Restructuring
Previously, the claims interface was satisfied with an implementation of a
Valid() errorfunction. This had several issues:Since all the validation functionality is now extracted into the validator, all
VerifyXXXandValidfunctions have been removed from theClaimsinterface. Instead, the interface now represents a list of getters to retrieve values with a specific meaning. This allows us to completely decouple the validation logic with the underlying storage representation of the claim, which could be a struct, a map or even something stored in a database.Supported Claim Types and Removal of
StandardClaimsThe two standard claim types supported by this library,
MapClaimsandRegisteredClaimsboth implement the necessary functions of this interface. The oldStandardClaimsstruct, which has already been deprecated inv4is now removed.Users using custom claims, in most cases, will not experience any changes in the behavior as long as they embedded
RegisteredClaims. If they created a new claim type from scratch, they now need to implemented the proper getter functions.Migrating Application Specific Logic of the old
ValidPreviously, users could override the
Validmethod in a custom claim, for example to extend the validation with application-specific claims. However, this was always very dangerous, since once could easily disable the standard validation and signature checking.In order to avoid that, while still supporting the use-case, a new
ClaimsValidatorinterface has been introduced. This interface consists of theValidate() errorfunction. If the validator sees, that aClaimsstruct implements this interface, the errors returned to theValidatefunction will be appended to the regular standard validation. It is not possible to disable the standard validation anymore (even only by accident).Usage examples can be found in example_test.go, to build claims structs like the following.
Changes to the
TokenandParserstructThe previously global functions
DecodeSegmentandEncodeSegmentwere moved to theParserandTokenstruct respectively. This will allow us in the future to configure the behavior of these two based on options supplied on the parser or the token (creation). This also removes two previously global variables and moves them to parser optionsWithStrictDecodingandWithPaddingAllowed.In order to do that, we had to adjust the way signing methods work. Previously they were given a base64 encoded signature in
Verifyand were expected to return a base64 encoded version of the signature inSign, both as astring. However, this made it necessary to haveDecodeSegmentandEncodeSegmentglobal and was a less than perfect design because we were repeating encoding/decoding steps for all signing methods. Now,SignandVerifyoperate on a decoded signature as a[]byte, which feels more natural for a cryptographic operation anyway. Lastly,ParseandSignedStringtake care of the final encoding/decoding part.In addition to that, we also changed the
Signaturefield onTokenfrom astringto[]byteand this is also now populated with the decoded form. This is also more consistent, because the other parts of the JWT, mainlyHeaderandClaimswere already stored in decoded form inToken. Only the signature was stored in base64 encoded form, which was redundant with the information in theRawfield, which contains the complete token as base64.Most (if not all) of these changes should not impact the normal usage of this library. Only users directly accessing the
Signaturefield as well as developers of custom signing methods should be affected.What's Changed
StandardClaimsin favor ofRegisteredClaimsby @oxisto in RemoveStandardClaimsin favor ofRegisteredClaims#235v5Pre-Release by @oxisto inv5Pre-Release #234DecodeSegementtoParserby @oxisto in MovingDecodeSegementtoParser#278Verify&Signto detail why string is not an advisable input for key by @dillonstreator in add documentation to hmacVerify&Signto detail why string is not an advisable input for key #249v5release by @oxisto in Last Documentation cleanups forv5release #291New Contributors
Verify&Signto detail why string is not an advisable input for key #249Full Changelog: v4.5.0...v5.0.0
This discussion was created from the release v5.0.0.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions