Bug Description
In the BFS postprocessing analysis we figured out that the turbulent viscosity at the wall should be computed using the wall expression (nonlinear model works) rather than the bulk value.
This allowed us to remove the "factor of 6" that was in that analysis (and that so far I do not understand, but feel free to pitch in if you do) and get the right result
This was undone by #50
Steps to Reproduce
See
Impact
Results look right for the wrong reasons.
Unless we can figure out what the factor of 6 means!
Bug Description
In the BFS postprocessing analysis we figured out that the turbulent viscosity at the wall should be computed using the wall expression (nonlinear model works) rather than the bulk value.
This allowed us to remove the "factor of 6" that was in that analysis (and that so far I do not understand, but feel free to pitch in if you do) and get the right result
This was undone by #50
Steps to Reproduce
See
open_pronghorn/validation/free_flow/isothermal/ercoftac_030_bfs/bfs_vnv_script_vector.py
Line 95 in 2662401
Impact
Results look right for the wrong reasons.
Unless we can figure out what the factor of 6 means!