10/26 notes and ac

Author: brownsarahm

_practice/2023-10-26.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+**integrative 2**: The PR title must be `practice-2023-10-26` verbatim to get the double credit
+
+create a `midterm.md` file in your kwl repo with 10 mutliple choice questions that cover topics from at least 5 different class sessions. Each question should have 4 options, 1 correct and 3 that represent a reasonable, but incorrect idea someone may have. All 10 questions should check understanding of key *concepts*, not only terminology or the name of a command. For each option explain why it is/not correct in a way that would help clarify someone's confusion if they had picked that answer instead of the correct answer. Each solution block must contain a link to the applicable class notes. 
+ **For this badge you must request a review from `@brownsarahm` **
+
+Use the following syntax: 
+
+```
+Question text 
+
+- [ ] a wrong answer
+- [ ] another wrong 
+- [x] correct answer marked with x
+- [ ] another wong
+
+---
+
+[section title](link/to/notes)
+- explanation for first wrong
+- explanation for second wrong
+- key point about correct
+- explantion for third wrong 
+
+---
+
+Next question 

_prepare/2023-10-31.md

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+1. Read about [connection protocols](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_protocol_suite) in general and specifically https and ssh. Wikipedia is a good source to start from,and  use additional sources to verify anything you find confusing.  Be sure you have the basic terminology down and bring questions to class. Plan to check off your questions as they are answered during class on Tuesady and then submit others in your experience reflection.  

_review/2023-10-26.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+**integrative 2**: The PR title must be `review-2023-10-26` verbatim to get the double credit
+
+create a `vocab-quiz.md` file with 10 mutliple choice questions that cover topics from at least 5 different class sessions. Each question should have 4 options, 1 correct and 3 that represent a reasonable, but incorrect idea someone may have. Questions should check that a person understand the key terms of the first half of the course. For each option explain why it is/not correct in a way that would help clarify someone's confusion if they had picked that answer instead of the correct answer. 
+
+
+
+ **For this badge you must request a review from `@brownsarahm` **
+ 
+Use the following syntax: 
+```
+Question text 
+
+- [ ] a wrong answer
+- [ ] another wrong 
+- [x] correct answer marked with x
+- [ ] another wong
+
+---
+
+[section title](link/to/notes)
+- explanation for first wrong
+- explanation for second wrong
+- key point about correct
+- explantion for third wrong 
+
+---
+
+Next question 
+
+```

_toc.yml

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ parts:
       - file: notes/2023-10-17
       - file: notes/2023-10-19
       - file: notes/2023-10-24
-      # - file: notes/2023-10-26
+      - file: notes/2023-10-26
   - caption: Activities
     chapters:
     - file: activities/kwl