|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +layout: post |
| 3 | +title: Cardano Budget 2025 – What Drives Our Budgeting Choice? |
| 4 | +description: Current voting power distribution in Cardano |
| 5 | +author: Alexander Nemish |
| 6 | +tags: cardano, treasury, governance, drep, voting |
| 7 | +categories: |
| 8 | +--- |
| 9 | +## Cardano Budget 2025: What Drives Our Budgeting Choice? |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +According to Article IV, Section 1 of the Cardano Constitution, the primary objective of community budgeting is to ensure the continuous operation, maintenance, and future development of the ecosystem. This mandate carries a dual responsibility: sustaining the present while investing in the future. |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +While it is crucial to use funds responsibly, the ultimate goal is not to cut costs at all costs—it’s to provide appropriate funding, in a timely manner, to enable the ecosystem’s growth. |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +We recognise and share the frustrations that have built up throughout the budgeting process. Despite these challenges, the following steps have been completed: |
| 16 | + |
| 17 | +* Proposals were submitted via GovTool for socialisation, received public feedback, and underwent revisions. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | +* Ekklesia voting allowed over 70% of the stake to participate and cast votes. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +* Final curation resulted in 39 proposals, totalling a ₳275M budget. |
| 22 | + |
| 23 | +* The Budget Info Action was supported by the majority of voting power. |
| 24 | + |
| 25 | +We believe the process has been good enough to produce a viable, representative, and balanced funding package. Reviewing the final list, we see a reasonable distribution across: |
| 26 | + |
| 27 | +* operations and innovation |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | +* technical and ecosystem-wide work |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +* established vendors and newer players |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +The suggested budget remains within the Net Change Limit (NCL, ₳350M), which was previously approved with 73.35% support. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +On top of this, Intersect, acting as Administrator, has introduced strong post-withdrawal safeguards: milestone-based contracts, smart contract-controlled fund releases, independent audits, and stop-payment mechanisms. |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +We have decided to honour our previous stance on bundling—voting in favour of all Treasury Withdrawal proposals that received 67%+ support in Ekklesia (₳250M) and supporting the remaining proposals selectively, based on the outcomes of the ongoing review sessions. |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +At this stage, we believe our responsibility is to ensure that these proposals receive funding, delivery can progress, and Cardano continues to advance—avoiding unnecessary stagnation in progress and innovation. |
0 commit comments