Add ⋮ declarations for val definitions
#83
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request adds the
⋮form, which behaves like the:form in Typed Racket, or like the declaration variant of the::form in Haskell. A Program likeis like this Haskell program,
which defines
xwith typeτto be equal to the value produced bye. It typechecksewithτas the expected type just like if you wrote(def x : τ e).This is similar to #74, but uses a different name so that
:can be the expression variant even in "ambiguous" positions such as the REPL.