Minim 1.0.0

[smizell]

Per issue #81, it seems like a good idea to move forward to 1.0.0 as soon we can. I've tried to go through and put the issues under the milestone of 1.0.0 that seem to be important to complete before we say "this is stable."

In addition that, I'd be really interested in other's thoughts. Is there anything else? Should any of the issues I've added not be considered?

[pksunkara]

I am wondering if we want to sync up with refractproject/rfcs#13

[smizell]

@pksunkara Do you mean move this to the RFC, or to include things from the RFC for 1.0.0?

[smizell]

Or timing?

[pksunkara]

When we release refract v1, I think we should do minim v1 which fully supports refract v1. But I also doubt that we should actually do that since there can be a backward incompatible changes in minim unlike refract for further versions. A minor version change in refract change can lead to major version change in minim.

What do you think?

[smizell]

I like the idea of them both going to 1.0.0 at around the same time. My hope is that 1.0.0 for both of them is more so just establishing the API is now stable. I think we should try to make it where going to it is a relatively small thing.

But I also agree, I don't think we can keep the version numbers in step with each other.