-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
Open
Description
I haven't seen any comments or issues discussing this crate's use of spin's SpinMutex, so I though I'd open an issue to ask whether this crate could perhaps use std::sync::Mutex instead? This would simplify the dependency graph and lower cpu utilization, probably without any performance impact.
matklad's article Spinlocks Considered Harmful is good advice, I think (though the linked benchmarks are a bit out of date now).
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels