Skip to content

Conversation

@matthiasklein
Copy link

This change resolves #1979

All 14 of my “faulty” transmissions that I had recorded are decoded correctly with this change.

@matthiasklein matthiasklein requested a review from seladb as a code owner October 23, 2025 06:47
@Dimi1010 Dimi1010 changed the base branch from master to dev October 25, 2025 07:03
@Dimi1010
Copy link
Collaborator

Changing base branch to dev as per Contributing.md.

@Dimi1010 Dimi1010 closed this Oct 25, 2025
@Dimi1010 Dimi1010 reopened this Oct 25, 2025
@seladb
Copy link
Owner

seladb commented Oct 25, 2025

@matthiasklein the X509Toolkit tests fail, I assume that this change is related. Can you please take a look?

@matthiasklein
Copy link
Author

@seladb I corrected the number of messages in the test. The 31 extracted certificates still have exactly the same content.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.46%. Comparing base (b91640f) to head (8fb159b).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
Packet++/src/TcpReassembly.cpp 66.66% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##              dev    #2002    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   83.45%   83.46%            
========================================
  Files         311      311            
  Lines       54578    54581     +3     
  Branches    11808    11607   -201     
========================================
+ Hits        45549    45554     +5     
+ Misses       7830     7794    -36     
- Partials     1199     1233    +34     
Flag Coverage Δ
alpine320 75.86% <42.10%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
fedora42 75.42% <42.10%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
macos-14 81.56% <52.38%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
macos-15 81.55% <52.38%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
mingw32 69.95% <35.29%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
mingw64 69.93% <35.29%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
npcap ?
rhel94 75.45% <42.10%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
ubuntu2004 59.45% <35.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
ubuntu2004-zstd 59.57% <35.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
ubuntu2204 75.37% <42.10%> (-0.04%) ⬇️
ubuntu2204-icpx 57.85% <31.57%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
ubuntu2404 75.48% <42.10%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
ubuntu2404-arm64 75.53% <38.88%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
unittest 83.46% <71.42%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
windows-2022 85.41% <68.42%> (+0.16%) ⬆️
windows-2025 85.44% <68.42%> (+0.12%) ⬆️
winpcap 85.44% <68.42%> (-0.08%) ⬇️
xdp 52.97% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Klein <matthias@extraklein.de>
…ages count after TcpReassembly changes

Note: the 31 extracted certificates still have exactly the same content.

Signed-off-by: Matthias Klein <matthias@extraklein.de>
@matthiasklein matthiasklein force-pushed the tcpreassembly-data-frames-after-fin branch from 4866a54 to 8fb159b Compare November 28, 2025 07:26
@matthiasklein
Copy link
Author

@seladb I have corrected the source code indentations that were complained about. Can you run the tests again?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TcpReassembly: data frames after FIN

3 participants