• @testing-library/dom version: 7.28.1
• Testing Framework and version: Jest 26.6.3
• DOM Environment: jsdom 16.4.0

Relevant code or config:

import { render } from "@testing-library/react";
import { getByRole } from "@testing-library/dom";

const { container } = render(
  <>
    <input aria-label="Input" style={{ display: "none" }} />
    <button aria-label="Button" style={{ display: "none" }} />
  </>,
);

expect(
  getByRole(container, "textbox", { name: "Input", hidden: true }),
).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(
  getByRole(container, "button", { name: "Button", hidden: true }),
).toBeInTheDocument();

What you did:

Attempted to test the presence of accessible elements with display: none;

What happened:

The Testing Library error reporter claims the name of these elements is "" and fails to match them against the provided name:

    TestingLibraryElementError: Unable to find an element with the role "textbox" and name "Input"

    Here are the available roles:

      textbox:

      Name "":
      <input
        aria-label="Input"
        style="display: none;"
      />

      --------------------------------------------------button:

      Name "":
      <button
        aria-label="Button"
        style="display: none;"
      />

      --------------------------------------------------

Reproduction:

Hopefully the provided code is sufficient, let me know if not

Problem description:

The example I've given is a little simplified–the real code I'm testing contains elements that are visible in desktop-width viewports, and if I understand correctly media query parsing is out-of-scope for Testing Library–but the issue is the same: these elements will become part of the accessibility tree under certain circumstances and I'm ignoring their invisibility in order to check that they have the correct accessible names. I would expect that I'd be able to do that with the hidden: true option set.

Suggested solution:

I don't have the time to spare to figure out the cause of this right now :( it might be related to recent changes around #804 ?