[Label Audit] Weekly Report — 2026-03-09 #188
Description
Scanned: 22 repositories | Run: 22858345466
⚠️ Synchronization Note: Label creation and update operations could not be performed in this run. Theadd-labelssafe-output only adds existing labels to issues/PRs — it cannot create or modify repository labels. Labels created and updated counts are 0. Manual synchronization vianpx github-label-syncis recommended (see footer).
Summary
| Metric | Count |
|---|---|
| Repos scanned | 22 |
| Taxonomy labels defined | 29 |
| Labels created (missing) | 0 |
| Labels updated (inconsistent) | 0 |
| Extra labels found (not in taxonomy) | 595 |
| Repos at 100% consistency | 0 |
Finding: All 22 managed repositories are at 0% label consistency with the canonical taxonomy. The repositories use a legacy labeling scheme (
type/bug,priority/critical,status/triage) instead of the canonical format (type: bug,priority: critical,status: needs-triage). A full label sync is required across all repos.
Consistency Scores
| Repository | Score | Missing | Inconsistent | Extra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ccpkg |
0% | 24 | 5 | 47 |
sdlc-quality |
0% | 28 | 1 | 27 |
.github |
0% | 29 | 0 | 30 |
github-project-manager |
0% | 29 | 0 | 24 |
homebrew-tap |
0% | 29 | 0 | 24 |
atlatl |
0% | 29 | 0 | 30 |
atlatl-spec |
0% | 29 | 0 | 41 |
rlm-rs |
0% | 29 | 0 | 29 |
MIF |
0% | 29 | 0 | 25 |
subcog |
0% | 29 | 0 | 24 |
lro-bench |
0% | 29 | 0 | 25 |
daedalus |
0% | 29 | 0 | 24 |
refactor |
0% | 29 | 0 | 24 |
human-voice |
0% | 29 | 0 | 24 |
rlm-rs-plugin |
0% | 29 | 0 | 24 |
memory-capture-plugin |
0% | 29 | 0 | 24 |
documentation-review |
0% | 29 | 0 | 24 |
adr |
0% | 29 | 0 | 26 |
adrscope |
0% | 29 | 0 | 26 |
git-adr |
0% | 29 | 0 | 25 |
structured-madr |
0% | 29 | 0 | 24 |
vscode-git-adr |
0% | 29 | 0 | 24 |
Labels Created
No labels were created this run (tool capability unavailable). All 22 repos need the full taxonomy of 29 labels provisioned. The complete set of missing labels for all repos is:
priority: critical · priority: high · priority: medium · priority: low · type: bug · type: feature · type: enhancement · type: documentation · type: security · type: maintenance · type: performance · status: needs-triage · status: in-progress · status: blocked · status: ready-for-review · status: approved · area: ci-cd · area: dependencies · area: testing · area: infrastructure · effort: small · effort: medium · effort: large · report · automated · org-monitor · stale-health · dep-ecosystem · agent-health
Labels Updated
No labels were updated this run. The following inconsistent labels were detected:
sdlc-quality — 1 label inconsistent
| Label | Field | Was | Now |
|---|---|---|---|
automated |
color | #ededed | #BFD4F2 |
automated |
description | (empty) | Created or managed by an automated workflow |
ccpkg — 5 labels inconsistent
| Label | Field | Was | Now |
|---|---|---|---|
priority: critical |
color | #b60205 | #FF0000 |
priority: critical |
description | Must be resolved immediately | Immediate attention required - production impact or security issue |
priority: high |
color | #d93f0b | #FF6B6B |
priority: high |
description | Should be resolved soon | Should be addressed in current sprint or iteration |
priority: medium |
color | #fbca04 | #FFE66D |
priority: medium |
description | Normal priority | Important but can be scheduled for upcoming work |
priority: low |
color | #0e8a16 | #4ECDC4 |
priority: low |
description | Nice to have | Nice to have - address when time permits |
status: blocked |
color | ✅ matches | — |
status: blocked |
description | Blocked by dependency or decision | Cannot proceed - waiting on external dependency or decision |
Extra Labels (Manual Review)
All repositories carry a legacy label scheme (type/bug, priority/critical, status/triage, etc.) plus default GitHub labels (bug, documentation, duplicate, enhancement, etc.) that are not part of the canonical taxonomy. Selected repos with notable extra labels:
ccpkg — 47 extra labels
Notable extras beyond the legacy scheme: spec, proposal, schema, host-adapter, component: agents, component: skills, component: hooks, component: mcp, component: lsp, component: instructions, host: claude-code, host: copilot, host: codex-cli, host: gemini-cli, host: opencode, website, registry, tooling, security, breaking-change, status: needs-discussion, status: ready
atlatl-spec — 41 extra labels
Notable extras: spec-gap, spec-inconsistency, conformance, cross-section, config, events, schema, llm-intelligence, tooling, audit:run8, audit:run9, audit:run10, audit, needs-triage, priority:high, priority:low, priority:medium
atlatl — 30 extra labels
Notable extras: spec-gap, spec-inconsistency, tooling, area/mcp, area/schema, area/search
.github — 30 extra labels
Notable extras: gpm/report, gpm/alert, gpm/knowledge, gpm/security, agentic-workflows, automation
All other repos — 24–29 extra labels each
All remaining repos carry the standard legacy scheme: type/bug, type/feature, type/enhancement, type/docs, type/chore, type/refactor, priority/critical, priority/high, priority/medium, priority/low, status/triage, status/blocked, status/in-progress, status/needs-review, status/wontfix plus default GitHub labels (bug, documentation, duplicate, enhancement, good first issue, help wanted, invalid, question, wontfix). Some repos have agentic-workflows, automation, automated, dependencies, rust.
Fully Consistent Repositories
No repositories reached 100% consistency with the canonical taxonomy this run.
Recommended Action
Run a full label sync across all managed repositories using github-label-sync:
for repo in .github github-project-manager sdlc-quality homebrew-tap atlatl atlatl-spec rlm-rs MIF subcog lro-bench daedalus ccpkg refactor human-voice rlm-rs-plugin memory-capture-plugin documentation-review adr adrscope git-adr structured-madr vscode-git-adr; do
npx github-label-sync --access-token $GITHUB_TOKEN --labels labels.yml zircote/$repo
doneOr trigger the sync-labels workflow:
gh workflow run sync-labels.yml -f repos=allGenerated by housekeeping-labels workflow — https://github.com/zircote/.github/actions/runs/22858345466
Generated by Housekeeping: Label Audit · ◷