Skip to content

Conversation

@kpj-2006
Copy link

@kpj-2006 kpj-2006 commented Dec 25, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated README with technology stack information
  • Chores

    • Streamlined feature request submission process by removing duplicate search verification requirement
    • Updated project license and configuration files
    • Modified file tracking behavior for generated auxiliary files

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 25, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Repository configuration and metadata files were modified: a duplicate-check verification requirement was removed from issue templates, LaTeX auxiliary file patterns were excluded from git tracking, and minor text updates were made to license and documentation files.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Issue Template Configuration
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml
Removed checkbox requirement "I have searched existing issues to avoid duplicates" from the form's terms section; minor whitespace adjustment to Markdown block.
Git Ignore Configuration
.gitignore
Removed LaTeX auxiliary file patterns (*.log, *.lot, *.fls, *.out, *.toc, *.fmt, *.fot, *.cb, *.cb2, .*lb) from git ignore rules, allowing these files to be tracked.
License & Documentation
LICENSE, README.md
License preamble text altered (phrasing corrupted); "zvx" inserted into Tech Stack section in README.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • add issue template #3: Directly conflicts with this PR on the .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml file—adds the duplicate-check checkbox as a required term while this PR removes it.

Poem

🐰 A rabbit hops through configs with care,
Removing checks and LaTeX files bare,
The issue forms now lighter than before,
With "zvx" dancing across the store! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'testing' is vague and generic, providing no meaningful information about the actual changes made to the repository. Replace the title with a descriptive summary of the primary change, such as 'Remove duplicate verification checkbox from feature request template' or 'Clean up configuration files and documentation'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9afc996 and ffd5b14.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml
  • .gitignore
  • LICENSE
  • README.md
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml (1)

10-10: Verify the impact of removing the duplicate-check requirement.

The whitespace changes are fine. However, the AI summary indicates that the "I have searched existing issues to avoid duplicates" checkbox was removed. This could lead to an increase in duplicate feature requests.

Consider whether removing this requirement aligns with your issue management strategy, or if it should be retained to reduce duplicate submissions.

Also applies to: 41-41

Comment on lines 1 to +4
## Core latex/pdflatex auxiliary files:
*.aux
*.lof
*.log
*.lot
*.fls
*.out
*.toc
*.fmt
*.fot
*.cb
*.cb2
.*.lb

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

# First, let's read the full .gitignore file to see what patterns exist
cat -n .gitignore

Repository: AOSSIE-Org/Template-Repo

Length of output: 5591


🏁 Script executed:

# Also run the suggested verification script to check for LaTeX files
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for LaTeX files in the repository to assess impact

echo "=== Searching for .tex files in repository ==="
fd -e tex -t f | head -n 20

echo ""
echo "=== Searching for LaTeX auxiliary files that would now be tracked ==="
fd -e log -e lot -e fls -e out -e toc -e fmt -e fot -e cb -e cb2 -t f | head -n 20

echo ""
echo "=== Count of LaTeX source and auxiliary files ==="
echo "TeX files: $(fd -e tex -t f | wc -l)"
echo "Log files: $(fd -e log -t f | wc -l)"
echo "Other aux files: $(fd -e lot -e fls -e out -e toc -t f | wc -l)"

Repository: AOSSIE-Org/Template-Repo

Length of output: 281


Add missing LaTeX auxiliary file patterns to the .gitignore "Core latex/pdflatex auxiliary files" section.

The "Core latex/pdflatex auxiliary files" section is incomplete. Standard patterns like *.log, *.out, *.toc, *.fmt, *.fot, *.cb, and *.cb2 are missing from this section and should be restored. While the repository currently contains no LaTeX files, this template repository should maintain these patterns for consistency with standard LaTeX gitignore configurations, ensuring future users have proper protection against accidental commits of auxiliary files.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In .gitignore around lines 1 to 4, the "Core latex/pdflatex auxiliary files"
section is missing common LaTeX auxiliary patterns; update that section to
include the standard entries (*.log, *.out, *.toc, *.fmt, *.fot, *.cb, *.cb2)
alongside the existing *.aux and *.lof so future commits don't accidentally
include LaTeX aux files.

Preamble

The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for
nse is a free, copyleft license for
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the LICENSE file content around line 9
echo "=== LICENSE file lines 1-20 ==="
head -n 20 LICENSE

echo ""
echo "=== Exact line 9 of LICENSE ==="
sed -n '9p' LICENSE

echo ""
echo "=== Line count of LICENSE ==="
wc -l LICENSE

echo ""
echo "=== Full LICENSE file preview (first 100 chars) ==="
head -c 500 LICENSE

Repository: AOSSIE-Org/Template-Repo

Length of output: 1604


🌐 Web query:

Official GNU GPL v3 license text preamble

💡 Result:

The preamble of the GNU General Public License, version 3 (official text):

The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for software and other kinds of works.

The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed to take away your freedom to share and change the works. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free software for all its users. We, the Free Software Foundation, use the GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to any other work released this way by its authors. You can apply it to your programs, too.

When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs, and that you know you can do these things.

To protect your rights, we need to make requirements that forbid anyone to deny you these rights or to ask you to surrender the rights. These restrictions translate to certain responsibilities for you if you distribute copies of the software, or if you modify it.

(Full license text available from the GNU Project.) [1][2]

Sources:
[1] GNU General Public License (Version 3) text as published on GNU/FSF pages.
[2] GNU Project — Licenses overview.


Restore the corrupted GPL v3 license text on line 9.

The LICENSE file contains corrupted text. Line 9 currently reads "nse is a free, copyleft license for" but the official GPL v3 text specifies "The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for". The opening phrase "The GNU General Public License is" is missing. License texts are legal documents and must match the official version exactly to maintain validity.

Replace line 9:

-nse is a free, copyleft license for
+The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
nse is a free, copyleft license for
The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In LICENSE around line 9, the GPLv3 text was corrupted: line 9 reads "nse is a
free, copyleft license for" but must exactly match the official wording. Replace
that line with the correct phrase "The GNU General Public License is a free,
copyleft license for" so the LICENSE file matches the official GPL v3 text
verbatim.


## 💻 Tech Stack

zvx
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Remove the random "zvx" text.

This appears to be accidental test input that was committed. It has no meaning in the context of the Tech Stack section and should be removed.

🔎 Proposed fix
-zvx
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
zvx
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around line 70, remove the stray text "zvx" which is accidental
test input; delete that token or the entire line so the Tech Stack section reads
cleanly and ensure surrounding paragraph/markdown spacing remains correct after
removal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant