testing

[kpj-2006]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation

  • Updated Tech Stack entry in README.
  • Modified license text resulting in an altered preamble line.

• Chores

  • Simplified feature request template by removing a required checkbox.
  • Changed which auxiliary files are ignored by version control, affecting tracked files.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Removed a duplicate-search checkbox from the feature request issue template, replaced a placeholder bullet with "zvx" in README Tech Stack, deleted several LaTeX ignore patterns from .gitignore, and unintentionally corrupted a line in LICENSE preamble.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
GitHub issue template .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml	Removed the "I have searched existing issues to avoid duplicates" checkbox and its required: true constraint; initial description block now starts directly after the header.
Documentation README.md	Replaced a standalone "-" placeholder in the Tech Stack section with the literal entry zvx.
VCS ignore rules .gitignore	Removed multiple LaTeX/pdflatex auxiliary patterns (*.log, *.lot, *.fls, *.out, *.toc, *.fmt, *.fot, *.cb, *.cb2, and .* .lb) so they will no longer be ignored.
License LICENSE	Modified a preamble line, changing "The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for" to "nse is a free, copyleft license for", corrupting that sentence.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• add issue template #3: Modifies the same .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml checkbox/validation that this PR removes.

Suggested reviewers

• Zahnentferner

Poem

🐰 I hopped through templates, README, and more,
Searched for checkboxes then closed the drawer,
"zvx" on the list, a curious sight,
Gitignore freed files to bask in the light,
A licensed line puzzled—I'll nibble it right.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'testing' is vague and generic, providing no meaningful information about the actual changes (removing a checkbox from issue template and updating README bullet point).	Use a descriptive title that summarizes the main changes, such as 'Remove duplicate search checkbox from feature request template' or 'Update feature request template and README'.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d7e289a and ffd5b14.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .gitignore
• LICENSE

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml (1)

10-10: Consider removing trailing whitespace.

Lines 10 and 41 contain trailing whitespace. While this has no functional impact, removing it improves file consistency.

Also applies to: 41-41

📜 Review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9afc996 and d7e289a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml
• README.md

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Remove or replace "zvx" with meaningful content.

The text "zvx" appears to be placeholder content, a typo, or an accidental edit. It doesn't represent a valid technology in the Tech Stack section. Consider either removing this line or replacing it with actual tech stack information.

🔎 Proposed fix

-zvx

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

zvx

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In README.md at line 70, the lone text "zvx" is placeholder/typo in the Tech
Stack section; remove that line or replace it with a valid technology or
descriptive text (e.g., a real dependency, framework, or "Add your tech here")
so the Tech Stack reads meaningfully and contains only accurate entries.