Skip to content

Conversation

@miroslavpojer
Copy link
Contributor

@miroslavpojer miroslavpojer commented Mar 21, 2025

Release Notes:

  • Introduced new jacoco-report gh action solution.

Closes #136

- Fake change to see result.
@AbsaOSS AbsaOSS deleted a comment from github-actions bot Mar 21, 2025
@AbsaOSS AbsaOSS deleted a comment from github-actions bot Mar 21, 2025
@AbsaOSS AbsaOSS deleted a comment from github-actions bot Mar 21, 2025
@AbsaOSS AbsaOSS deleted a comment from github-actions bot Mar 21, 2025
@AbsaOSS AbsaOSS deleted a comment from github-actions bot Mar 21, 2025
@AbsaOSS AbsaOSS deleted a comment from github-actions bot Mar 21, 2025
@AbsaOSS AbsaOSS deleted a comment from github-actions bot Mar 21, 2025
@AbsaOSS AbsaOSS deleted a comment from github-actions bot Mar 21, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 21, 2025

JaCoCo code coverage report - Scala 2.11

Metric (instruction) Coverage Threshold Status
Overall 76.8% 75.0%
Changed Files 0.0% 80.0%

No changed file in report.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 21, 2025

JaCoCo code coverage report - Scala 2.12

Metric (instruction) Coverage Threshold Status
Overall 75.28% 75.0%
Changed Files 0.0% 80.0%

No changed file in report.

@AbsaOSS AbsaOSS deleted a comment from github-actions bot Mar 21, 2025
@AbsaOSS AbsaOSS deleted a comment from github-actions bot Mar 21, 2025
@miroslavpojer miroslavpojer marked this pull request as ready for review March 23, 2025 17:03
@miroslavpojer miroslavpojer self-assigned this Mar 23, 2025
@miroslavpojer miroslavpojer marked this pull request as draft March 23, 2025 17:12
@miroslavpojer miroslavpojer marked this pull request as ready for review March 23, 2025 18:44
core.setFailed('Changed files coverage is less than 80%!')
sensitivity: "detail"
comment-mode: 'single'
min-coverage-overall: 80.0
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You changed the overall coverage from 0% to 80%. That can be quite restrictive. Is it justified?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@miroslavpojer miroslavpojer Apr 1, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see. I will set it to 75% as min. It should be passing. See commit - 2efb63c.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Apr 1, 2025

@miroslavpojer miroslavpojer requested a review from benedeki April 1, 2025 13:01
@miroslavpojer miroslavpojer merged commit ab98348 into master Apr 1, 2025
17 checks passed
@miroslavpojer miroslavpojer deleted the feature/136-Introduced-new-gh-action---jacoco-report branch April 1, 2025 13:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Introduce new gh action - jacoco-report

4 participants