Ci testing Ejemplo :( #7
Conversation
WalkthroughThis PR modernizes a Kotlin/Android project with major toolchain upgrades: JDK 11→17, Gradle 7.4→8.5, Android Gradle Plugin 4.1.3→8.1.0, Kotlin 1.6.10→1.9.0, and Android SDK targets 31→34. AndroidX, coroutines, Room, and test dependencies are upgraded, with one test behavioral change reflecting modified API fallback logic. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20–25 minutes Rationale: The majority of changes are homogeneous dependency updates across Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
app/src/test/java/com/cursokotlin/mvvmexample/domain/GetQuotesUseCaseTest.kt (1)
26-36: Test expectation contradicts implementation – test will fail.The test's line 35 changed from
coVerify(exactly = 1)tocoVerify(exactly = 0), but this contradicts the actualGetQuotesUseCaseimplementation.The implementation explicitly calls
repository.getAllQuotesFromDatabase()in the else branch when the API returns empty—yet the test now expects this method to be called zero times. This mismatch will cause the test to fail.Correct this by either:
- Revert line 35 back to
coVerify(exactly = 1)to match the actual behavior, or- Update the implementation to remove the database fallback (delete the else clause)
Additionally, align the test name with the actual behavior. Currently it states "get values from database" but expects zero database calls.
local.properties (1)
1-8: Critical: Remove local.properties from version control.The file header explicitly states this file "must NOT be checked into Version Control Systems" (Line 1-2). This file contains machine-specific paths and should be in
.gitignoreinstead.Apply this fix:
- Add
local.propertiesto.gitignore- Remove it from the repository:
git rm --cached local.properties
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.jaris excluded by!**/*.jar
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/testing.yml(2 hunks)app/build.gradle(3 hunks)app/src/test/java/com/cursokotlin/mvvmexample/domain/GetQuotesUseCaseTest.kt(1 hunks)build.gradle(1 hunks)gradle.properties(1 hunks)gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties(1 hunks)gradlew(4 hunks)local.properties(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.8)
.github/workflows/ci.yml
14-14: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
16-16: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
.github/workflows/testing.yml
10-10: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
gradle/wrapper/gradle-wrapper.properties (1)
3-5: LGTM! Gradle wrapper upgraded to 8.5 with good defaults.The upgrade from Gradle 7.4 to 8.5 is well-configured. The addition of
networkTimeoutandvalidateDistributionUrlare good practices for reliability and security.gradle.properties (2)
9-9: LGTM! JVM args expanded for Java 17 compatibility.The extensive
--add-opensflags are necessary for Gradle and Android tooling to work with Java 17's module system. These open internal JDK packages to unnamed modules, which is a common requirement when upgrading to Java 17.
15-15: LGTM! Comment typo fixed.The apostrophe correction improves readability.
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
5-7: LGTM! Branch configuration reformatted.The compact array syntax is functionally equivalent and more concise.
app/build.gradle (6)
9-9: LGTM! Namespace declaration added.The
namespacedeclaration is required by Android Gradle Plugin 8.x and properly configured.
29-30: LGTM! Java version upgraded to 17.The Java compatibility settings are correctly aligned with the project-wide Java 17 migration.
Also applies to: 34-34
45-48: LGTM! Core dependencies modernized.The AndroidX, coroutines, and lifecycle dependency updates are appropriate for the AGP 8.x and Kotlin 1.9 upgrade.
Also applies to: 51-57, 62-62
70-75: LGTM! Test dependencies updated.The test dependency upgrades (JUnit, MockK, coroutines-test, AndroidX test) align with the project modernization.
67-68: Let me verify the database schema structure and check for any migration strategies or fallback configurations:Now let me check the database builder configuration and look for any migration strategies or schema export:
Let me examine the QuoteDatabase file and the build.gradle configuration more closely to verify the current setup:
Based on my verification of the Room 2.6.1 migration requirements and the codebase, here is the rewritten review comment:
Room 2.6.1 update requires no migration for version 1 database.
Since exportSchema is true by default in Room, and your
QuoteDatabaseis at version 1 with no schema changes, migrations are not required. Room supports automated migrations in version 2.4.0-alpha01 and higher, making 2.6.1 fully compatible with your current setup.No changes needed—the current implementation is compatible with Room 2.6.1.
10-10: No SDK 34 breaking changes apply to this app—verification complete.The upgrade to SDK 34 is safe. The app doesn't implement foreground services, exact alarms, photo/media pickers, or full-screen intents—all features mentioned in the review comment that would require changes. The minimal AndroidManifest and MVVM codebase (Retrofit + Room) have no code patterns affected by SDK 34 restrictions. The app targets SDK 34 without requiring any modifications for the stated concerns.
gradlew (1)
58-58: LGTM! Gradle wrapper script updated to 8.5.This is the standard Gradle 8.5 wrapper script with improved:
- POSIX shell compatibility (Lines 147-159)
- Java detection using
command -vinstead ofwhich(Lines 134-140)- Better error handling and validation (Lines 217-221)
- Default JVM options handling (Lines 202-203)
These are generated changes and should not be manually modified.
Also applies to: 83-87, 134-140, 147-159, 202-221
build.gradle (2)
10-10: AGP 8.1.0 migration verified—all critical requirements satisfied.The namespace declaration at app/build.gradle line 9 is correctly implemented as
namespace 'com.cursokotlin.mvvmexample'. Build configuration is compatible with AGP 8.1.0: Gradle wrapper is at 8.5 (compatible with AGP 8.x), Java 17 is set (sourceCompatibility/targetCompatibility), Kotlin 1.9.0 and Hilt 2.48 are both current versions, and buildFeatures are appropriately configured. All breaking changes from the AGP 4.x→8.1.0 migration have been addressed.
3-4: **No breaking changes detected—upgrade is safe. **Verification complete across both major version upgrades:
Kotlin 1.6.10→1.9.0: The codebase avoids all identified breaking changes. The project is a standard Android app (not multiplatform), so the
android { }→androidTarget { }renaming does not apply. No usage of@JvmDefault,external enum, deprecatedVolatileAPIs, or K2 compiler was detected. AGP 8.1.0 is compatible with Kotlin 1.9.0.Hilt 2.35→2.48: Verified standard Hilt patterns (
@Module,@InstallIn(SingletonComponent),@Provides). No custom Dagger SPI plugins or wildcard generic bindings found. Project uses kapt, so KSP alpha issues do not apply.All Kotlin language features and Hilt usage patterns in the codebase are compatible with the upgraded versions.
| - name: set up JDK 17 | ||
| uses: actions/setup-java@v3 | ||
| with: | ||
| java-version: '11' | ||
| java-version: '17' | ||
| distribution: 'temurin' | ||
| cache: gradle |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
LGTM! JDK upgraded to 17.
The Java version upgrade aligns with the project's migration to Java 17.
However, static analysis flags outdated actions. Consider upgrading:
- - uses: actions/checkout@v3
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
- - name: set up JDK 17
- uses: actions/setup-java@v3
+ - name: Set up JDK 17
+ uses: actions/setup-java@v4Verify the latest stable versions:
🌐 Web query:
GitHub actions/checkout and actions/setup-java latest versions
💡 Result:
As of Oct 18, 2025:
- actions/checkout: use actions/checkout@v5. [1]
- actions/setup-java: use actions/setup-java@v5. [2]
Sources: repository READMEs. [1] https://github.com/actions/checkout, [2] https://github.com/actions/setup-java.
Upgrade GitHub Actions to latest stable versions.
The actions/checkout and actions/setup-java should be upgraded to v5:
- - uses: actions/checkout@v3
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v5
- - name: set up JDK 17
- uses: actions/setup-java@v3
+ - name: Set up JDK 17
+ uses: actions/setup-java@v5Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.8)
16-16: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/ci.yml lines 15-20: the workflow uses older action versions;
update actions/setup-java@v3 to actions/setup-java@v5 (and similarly ensure
actions/checkout is using v5 elsewhere in the file) by changing the action
references to the v5 stable tags and verify any input names still match v5
semantics (e.g., keep java-version, distribution, cache or adapt to v5 docs),
then run a workflow lint or dry run to confirm no breaking changes.
| - name: set up JDK 17 | ||
| uses: actions/setup-java@v3 | ||
| with: | ||
| java-version: '11' | ||
| java-version: '17' | ||
| distribution: 'temurin' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
LGTM! JDK upgraded to 17.
The Java version upgrade aligns with the project's migration to Java 17 for compilation and runtime.
However, static analysis flags that actions/setup-java@v3 may be outdated. Consider upgrading to v4:
- - name: set up JDK 17
- uses: actions/setup-java@v3
+ - name: Set up JDK 17
+ uses: actions/setup-java@v4Verify the latest stable version:
🌐 Web query:
GitHub actions/setup-java latest version
💡 Result:
Latest released tag: v5.0.0. [1][2]
Sources:
- actions/setup-java releases (v5.0.0). [1]
- actions/setup-java README (usage shows actions/setup-java@v5). [2]
Update GitHub Actions setup-java to the latest stable version (v5).
The current code uses actions/setup-java@v3, which is outdated. The latest released version is v5.0.0. Update the workflow to use the latest stable version:
- name: Set up JDK 17
uses: actions/setup-java@v3
+ uses: actions/setup-java@v5Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.8)
10-10: the runner of "actions/setup-java@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/testing.yml around lines 9 to 13: the workflow uses
actions/setup-java@v3 which is outdated; update the action reference to the
latest stable major release (v5) by changing the uses line to
actions/setup-java@v5 and keep existing with inputs (java-version: '17' and
distribution: 'temurin') so the job continues to set up JDK 17 using the new
action.
1 participant
OULLEA
Summary by CodeRabbit