Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Welcome! It looks like this is your first pull request in Blockly, so here are a couple of tips:
- You can find tips about contributing to Blockly and how to validate your changes on our developer site.
- All contributors must sign the Google Contributor License Agreement (CLA). If the google-cla bot leaves a comment on this PR, make sure you follow the instructions.
- We use conventional commits to make versioning the package easier. Make sure your commit message is in the proper format or learn how to fix it.
- If any of the other checks on this PR fail, you can click on them to learn why. It might be that your change caused a test failure, or that you need to double-check the style guide.
Thank you for opening this PR! A member of the Blockly team will review it soon.
Merged
1 task
BenHenning
added a commit
to RaspberryPiFoundation/blockly
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 30, 2025
## The basics - [x] I [validated my changes](https://developers.google.com/blockly/guides/contribute/core#making_and_verifying_a_change) ## The details ### Resolves Fixes #9447 ### Proposed Changes Pin the `actions/first-interactions` action to v1.3.0 and update the input parameters. Configure Dependabot to no longer try to upgrade this version. ### Reason for Changes There are three sets of failures being addressed here: 1. `v3.0.0` introduces a breaking changes by renaming the input names. 2. `v3.1.0` introduces a breaking change that somehow enforces `issue_message` being required which isn't being defined for Blockly (we only welcome on PRs). This hasn't been addressed by the action author so this PR pins to v3.0.0 to go back to a working version.\* 3. `v2` introduced a breaking behavioral change that caused all runs of the workflow to outright fail by not being compatible with `pull_request_target`. \* Technically it was broken when upgraded in #9323 due to a warning (rather than error) enforcing the now-required parameters. That was hiding a failure introduced when upgraded in #9274 that outright broke the workflow due to it running with `pull_request_target`. ### Test Coverage The team doesn't utilize automated tests for the workflow configurations themselves thus verifying them through running CI is sufficient. BenHenning#16 (review) demonstrates this passing and working correctly with a merged in version of this branch (since the workflow uses `pull_request_target` it cannot be verified in this PR's CI workflow) for a 'new' contributor (thanks for the help @rpbourret and @maribethb). ### Documentation No documentation changes are needed for this workflow configuration change. ### Additional Information Nothing to add that's not above or in the filed bug.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The basics
The details
Resolves
Notes that Blockly is Open Source.
Proposed Changes
Notes that Blockly is Open Source.
Reason for Changes
Blockly is Open Source.
Test Coverage
Documentation
Additional Information