Closed
Conversation
Author
|
Included via #88 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With a start on the docs based on #81.
A working test is available in
examples/groth16_cut_and_choose_vsss.rs.There is currently a lot of code duplication with the sp1 soldering approach. They should probably be unified in a tidier way, but I wanted to focus on getting this work before. Also some of the code & docs needs some general clean up. For example, I want to move some of the code out of the example into the evaluator impl.
One more small note: this implements vsss but not yet the adaptor sigs. Meaning it sends over the wide labels directly from the garbler to the evaluator instead of encoding to and decoding them from adaptor sigs. That's still todo, but should be straightforward since the low level code for that is already implemented and it doesn't need major protocol overhauls.
General notes:
run_regarbling_vsssvsrun_regarblingare now functionally quite different