Skip to content

Dev#1

Open
ClementBobin wants to merge 13 commits intomainfrom
dev
Open

Dev#1
ClementBobin wants to merge 13 commits intomainfrom
dev

Conversation

@ClementBobin
Copy link
Owner

This pull request introduces several new workflows and configurations for deployment, testing, versioning, and synchronization. The changes aim to enhance automation, enforce standards, and streamline processes across various environments and technologies.

Deployment Workflows

  • deploy/Deploy-ssh.yml: Added a workflow for deploying to infrastructure using SSH, including steps for code checkout and server deployment.
  • deploy/aws/ecs.yml: Added a workflow for deploying Docker Compose services to Amazon ECS, including AWS credential configuration and ECR login.
  • deploy/docker/docker-publish.yml: Added a workflow for publishing Docker images, including metadata extraction, image signing, and multi-platform builds.

Git Commit and Release Management

Testing and Coverage

  • test/Docker.yml: Added a Docker Compose validation workflow for pull requests.
  • test/dotnet-test.yml: Introduced a .NET test coverage workflow with integration to Codecov and SonarCloud.
  • test/flutter-test.yml: Added a Flutter test coverage workflow, including artifact uploads and SonarCloud scans.
  • test/laravel-test.yml: Added a Laravel test coverage workflow with PHPUnit integration and Codecov uploads.
  • test/nodejs-test.yml: Introduced a Node.js test coverage workflow using Jest and integration with Codecov and SonarCloud.

Version Management

  • nodejs/Auto_Increment_Version.yml: Added a workflow to automatically increment the version in package.json if the pull request branch version matches the main branch version.

Miscellaneous Enhancements

  • openapi/Publish_API_Docs.yml: Added a workflow to publish API documentation using Scalar CLI for both production and development environments.
  • nix/flake-check.yml: Introduced a Nix flake check workflow to validate configurations for both root and template flakes.

@ClementBobin ClementBobin requested a review from Copilot June 21, 2025 15:35
@ClementBobin ClementBobin self-assigned this Jun 21, 2025
@ClementBobin ClementBobin added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 21, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Automated deployment pipelines for SSH, AWS ECS, and Docker environments.
    • Docker image building, pushing, and security signing integrated into CI/CD.
    • Automated semantic versioning and release management.
    • Test coverage workflows for .NET, Flutter, Laravel, and Node.js.
    • Android and iOS release build automation.
    • API documentation publishing automation.
    • Azure DevOps and GitHub synchronization.
  • Chores

    • Commit message linting configuration added.
    • Nix flake validation workflow implemented.
    • Node.js version auto-increment on pull requests.

Walkthrough

Added multiple new GitHub Actions workflows and supporting configs to automate deployments (SSH, AWS ECS, Docker), CI/test pipelines, releases/changelog, commit linting, Nix flake checks, GitHub↔Azure sync, OpenAPI publishing, and Node.js version auto-increment.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Deploy: SSH
deploy/Deploy-ssh.yml
New workflow to deploy via SSH on pushes to main, cloning or pulling repository and running remote deploy commands.
Deploy: AWS ECS
deploy/aws/ecs.yml
New workflow to build images, push to ECR, and update ECS task/service on main pushes, waiting for service stability.
Deploy: Docker Publish
deploy/docker/docker-publish.yml
New Docker CI to build (Buildx), push, cache, and sign images (cosign); triggered on schedule, pushes, tags, and PRs.
Git: Commit Linting
git/lint/.commitlintrc.json, git/lint/lint-commits.yml
Added commitlint configuration and a PR-triggered workflow to validate commit messages.
Git: Release & Changelog
git/release/.releaserc.json, git/release/changelog.yml
Added semantic-release config and workflow to run releases, generate changelog, and commit changelog on main.
Git: Sync with Azure
git/sync/sync-with-azure.yml, git/sync/sync_config.json
Added scheduled and event-driven workflow plus JSON config to synchronize GitHub issues/events with Azure DevOps.
Nix: Flake Check
nix/flake-check.yml
Added workflow to run nix flake check for root and template flakes on pushes and PRs.
Node.js: Auto Increment
nodejs/Auto_Increment_Version.yml
Added PR workflow to compare package.json versions between main and PR, and auto-increment patch when identical.
OpenAPI: Publish Docs
openapi/Publish_API_Docs.yml
Added workflow to publish openapi/galaxy.yaml to Scalar on branch pushes that change that file, selecting namespace by branch.
CI: Tests & Coverage (grouped)
test/Docker.yml, test/dotnet-test.yml, test/flutter-test.yml, test/laravel-test.yml, test/nodejs-test.yml
Added PR-triggered workflows to validate Docker Compose and collect/upload coverage for .NET, Flutter, Laravel, Node.js; integrate with Codecov and SonarCloud.
Build: Android / Android+iOS Release
build/Android-deploy.yml, build/Android-Ios-deploy.yml
Added semantic-release integrated mobile release workflows: build/sign Android APK (and optionally iOS IPA), extract version via dry-run, and attach artifacts to GitHub release.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer (GitHub)
    participant GH as GitHub Actions
    participant Remote as Remote Server
    participant ECR as AWS ECR/ECS
    participant Reg as Docker Registry
    participant Azure as Azure DevOps
    participant Scalar as Scalar API
    participant Codecov as Codecov
    participant Sonar as SonarCloud

    Dev->>GH: Push / PR / Schedule / Tag events
    alt Deploy via SSH (main)
        GH->>Remote: SSH -> clone/pull -> run deploy script
    end
    alt Deploy to AWS ECS (main)
        GH->>ECR: build images -> push
        GH->>ECR: update ECS task/service -> wait for stable
    end
    alt Docker publish (push/tag/schedule)
        GH->>Reg: buildx build -> push -> cosign sign
    end
    alt Test workflows (PR)
        GH->>GH: run tests -> collect coverage
        GH->>Codecov: upload coverage
        GH->>Sonar: run analysis
    end
    alt Sync / Docs
        GH->>Azure: run GitSync (scheduled/events)
        GH->>Scalar: publish OpenAPI docs (branch namespace)
    end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes

  • Attention recommended for:
    • Secrets and environment variable usage across deploy/*, git/release/*, and openapi/*.
    • AWS ECR/ECS image tagging, role/permission steps in deploy/aws/ecs.yml.
    • Docker Buildx cache, multi-platform flags, and cosign signing flow in deploy/docker/docker-publish.yml.
    • Node.js auto-increment logic and its conditional push behavior in nodejs/Auto_Increment_Version.yml.
    • Nix path substitutions and cleanup in nix/flake-check.yml.
    • Mobile signing credentials and artifact attachment in build/Android-deploy.yml and build/Android-Ios-deploy.yml.

Poem

I hopped through workflows with nimble paws,
Pushed builds and tests and linting laws.
I cloned, I pushed, I signed with glee,
A carrot release for you and me.
🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The pull request title "Dev" is extremely vague and generic, failing to convey any meaningful information about the changeset. While the term "Dev" could theoretically relate to development work, it does not provide sufficient clarity or specificity for a teammate scanning commit history to understand what this pull request accomplishes. The PR contains numerous GitHub Actions workflows and configuration files across multiple domains (deployment, testing, versioning, synchronization), yet the title offers no indication of this scope or focus, making it essentially non-descriptive. The title should be replaced with something more specific and descriptive that captures the primary focus of the changes, such as "Add GitHub Actions workflows for deployment, testing, and release management" or a more concise variant that conveys the main objective of introducing CI/CD automation infrastructure.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed The pull request description is comprehensive and clearly related to the changeset. It provides a well-organized summary of all changes introduced, including deployment workflows (SSH, AWS ECS, Docker), git management configurations (commitlint, semantic-release, Azure DevOps sync), testing workflows across multiple frameworks (dotnet, Flutter, Laravel, Node.js), version management automation, and API documentation publishing. Each section accurately describes what files were added and their purpose, directly corresponding to the actual changes present in the raw_summary.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch dev

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2025

Note

Unit test generation is an Early Access feature. Expect some limitations and changes as we gather feedback and continue to improve it.


Generating unit tests... This may take up to 20 minutes.

Repository owner deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Jun 21, 2025
Repository owner deleted a comment from coderabbitai bot Jun 21, 2025
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request introduces several new GitHub Actions workflows to improve deployment, testing, versioning, and synchronization processes for the project. Key changes include new workflows for various testing environments (Node.js, Laravel, Flutter, .NET, and Docker), deployment pipelines (SSH, Amazon ECS, Docker publishing), and enhancements for commit linting, semantic release management, and synchronization with Azure DevOps.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 17 out of 18 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
test/nodejs-test.yml Added Node.js test coverage workflow with Codecov and SonarCloud integration.
test/laravel-test.yml Added Laravel PHPUnit test coverage workflow integrated with Codecov and SonarCloud.
test/flutter-test.yml Introduced Flutter test coverage workflow with artifact uploads.
test/dotnet-test.yml Added .NET test coverage workflow using XPlat Code Coverage and SonarCloud scanning.
test/Docker.yml Added Docker Compose validation workflow for pull requests.
openapi/Publish_API_Docs.yml Added workflow to publish API documentation with Scalar CLI.
nodejs/Auto_Increment_Version.yml Introduced automatic version incrementing for package.json.
nix/flake-check.yml Added Nix flake validation for configurations.
git/sync/sync_config.json Added configuration file for synchronizing GitHub issues with Azure DevOps.
git/sync/sync-with-azure.yml Added workflow for syncing GitHub issues with Azure DevOps.
git/release/changelog.yml Added release and changelog generation workflow.
git/release/.releaserc.json Added semantic release configuration.
git/lint/lint-commits.yml Added workflow for commit message linting.
git/lint/.commitlintrc.json Introduced commit lint rules for consistent commit messages.
deploy/docker/docker-publish.yml Added Docker image build, push, and signing workflow.
deploy/aws/ecs.yml Added workflow for deploying Docker Compose services to Amazon ECS.
deploy/Deploy-ssh.yml Added SSH deployment workflow for infrastructure.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2025

Here are the copyable unit test edits:

Copyable Edits

test/test_yaml_configs.py

import unittest
import yaml
import os
import tempfile
import shutil
from unittest.mock import patch, mock_open, MagicMock
from pathlib import Path
import json
from io import StringIO
import time


class TestYamlConfigs(unittest.TestCase):
    """
    Comprehensive test suite for YAML configuration file validation and processing.

    This test suite covers:
    - Valid YAML loading and parsing
    - Schema validation and structure verification
    - Error handling for malformed YAML
    - Edge cases (empty files, missing files, permissions)
    - Security considerations (safe loading)
    - Performance testing with large configurations
    - Data type validation and encoding handling
    """

    def setUp(self):
        """Set up test fixtures before each test method."""
        self.temp_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp()

        # Valid YAML configuration for testing
        self.valid_yaml_content = {
            'id': 'test-rule',
            'message': 'Test rule for validation',
            'languages': ['python', 'javascript'],
            'rule': {
                'kind': 'function_definition',
                'has': {
                    'kind': 'identifier',
                    'regex': '^test.*$'
                }
            },
            'severity': 'warning',
            'metadata': {
                'author': 'test-author',
                'version': '1.0.0',
                'tags': ['security', 'best-practice']
            }
        }

        # AST-grep rule structure based on project files
        self.ast_grep_rule = {
            'id': 'dont-call-system-c',
            'message': 'Potential code injection via system() function call',
            'languages': ['c'],
            'rule': {
                'kind': 'call_expression',
                'has': {
                    'kind': 'identifier',
                    'regex': '^system$'
                }
            },
            'severity': 'error'
        }

    def tearDown(self):
        """Clean up test fixtures after each test method."""
        if os.path.exists(self.temp_dir):
            shutil.rmtree(self.temp_dir, ignore_errors=True)

    def test_load_valid_yaml_config(self):
        """Test loading a valid YAML configuration file."""
        yaml_file = os.path.join(self.temp_dir, 'valid_config.yaml')
        with open(yaml_file, 'w') as f:
            yaml.dump(self.valid_yaml_content, f)

        with open(yaml_file, 'r') as f:
            loaded_config = yaml.safe_load(f)

        self.assertEqual(loaded_config['id'], 'test-rule')
        self.assertEqual(loaded_config['message'], 'Test rule for validation')
        self.assertIsInstance(loaded_config['languages'], list)
        self.assertIn('python', loaded_config['languages'])
        self.assertEqual(loaded_config['severity'], 'warning')

    def test_load_ast_grep_rule_structure(self):
        """Test loading AST-grep rule YAML structure."""
        yaml_file = os.path.join(self.temp_dir, 'ast_grep_rule.yaml')
        with open(yaml_file, 'w') as f:
            yaml.dump(self.ast_grep_rule, f)

        with open(yaml_file, 'r') as f:
            loaded_rule = yaml.safe_load(f)

        self.assertEqual(loaded_rule['id'], 'dont-call-system-c')
        self.assertEqual(loaded_rule['severity'], 'error')
        self.assertIn('c', loaded_rule['languages'])
        self.assertIn('rule', loaded_rule)
        self.assertIn('kind', loaded_rule['rule'])

    def test_yaml_config_structure_validation(self):
        """Test that YAML config has required structure and keys."""
        required_keys = ['id', 'message', 'languages', 'severity']
        for key in required_keys:
            self.assertIn(key, self.valid_yaml_content)

        # Test nested structure
        self.assertIn('rule', self.valid_yaml_content)
        self.assertIn('kind', self.valid_yaml_content['rule'])
        self.assertIn('metadata', self.valid_yaml_content)
        self.assertIn('version', self.valid_yaml_content['metadata'])

    def test_load_malformed_yaml_config(self):
        """Test handling of malformed YAML configuration."""
        malformed_yaml_cases = [
            "id: test-rule\nmessage: [invalid yaml syntax",
            "id: test-rule\n  message: badly indented",
            "id: test-rule\nmessage: 'unclosed string",
            "- item1\n  - item2\n- item3",
        ]

        for i, malformed_yaml in enumerate(malformed_yaml_cases):
            with self.subTest(case=i):
                yaml_file = os.path.join(self.temp_dir, f'malformed_{i}.yaml')
                with open(yaml_file, 'w') as f:
                    f.write(malformed_yaml)

                with self.assertRaises(yaml.YAMLError):
                    with open(yaml_file, 'r') as f:
                        yaml.safe_load(f)

    def test_load_nonexistent_config_file(self):
        """Test handling when configuration file does not exist."""
        nonexistent_file = os.path.join(self.temp_dir, 'nonexistent.yaml')

        with self.assertRaises(FileNotFoundError):
            with open(nonexistent_file, 'r') as f:
                yaml.safe_load(f)

    def test_empty_yaml_config(self):
        """Test handling of empty YAML configuration file."""
        empty_file = os.path.join(self.temp_dir, 'empty.yaml')
        with open(empty_file, 'w') as f:
            f.write('')

        with open(empty_file, 'r') as f:
            config = yaml.safe_load(f)
        self.assertIsNone(config)

    def test_yaml_config_with_null_values(self):
        """Test YAML config with null values."""
        config_with_nulls = {
            'id': 'test-rule',
            'message': None,
            'languages': ['python'],
            'optional_field': None
        }
        yaml_content = yaml.dump(config_with_nulls)
        loaded = yaml.safe_load(yaml_content)
        self.assertIsNone(loaded['message'])
        self.assertIsNone(loaded['optional_field'])
        self.assertEqual(loaded['id'], 'test-rule')

    def test_yaml_config_data_types(self):
        """Test various data types in YAML configuration."""
        mixed_types_config = {
            'string_value': 'test_string',
            'integer_value': 42,
            'float_value': 3.14,
            'boolean_value': True,
            'list_value': [1, 2, 3],
            'dict_value': {'nested': 'value'},
            'null_value': None,
            'multiline_string': 'line1\nline2\nline3'
        }

        yaml_content = yaml.dump(mixed_types_config)
        loaded = yaml.safe_load(yaml_content)

        self.assertIsInstance(loaded['string_value'], str)
        self.assertIsInstance(loaded['integer_value'], int)
        self.assertIsInstance(loaded['float_value'], float)
        self.assertIsInstance(loaded['boolean_value'], bool)
        self.assertIsInstance(loaded['list_value'], list)
        self.assertIsInstance(loaded['dict_value'], dict)
        self.assertIsNone(loaded['null_value'])
        self.assertIn('\n', loaded['multiline_string'])

    def test_yaml_config_with_special_characters(self):
        """Test YAML config with special characters and unicode."""
        special_config = {
            'unicode_string': 'héllo wörld 你好',
            'special_chars': '!@#$%^&*()',
            'regex_pattern': '^[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*$',
            'path_like': '/path/to/file.txt',
            'quoted_string': '"quoted content"'
        }

        yaml_content = yaml.dump(special_config, allow_unicode=True)
        loaded = yaml.safe_load(yaml_content)

        self.assertEqual(loaded['unicode_string'], 'héllo wörld 你好')
        self.assertEqual(loaded['special_chars'], '!@#$%^&*()')
        self.assertEqual(loaded['regex_pattern'], '^[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*$')

    def test_yaml_config_boolean_variations(self):
        """Test different boolean representations in YAML."""
        boolean_yaml = """
        true_values:
          - true
          - True
          - TRUE
          - yes
          - Yes
          - on
        false_values:
          - false
          - False
          - FALSE
          - no
          - No
          - off
        """

        loaded = yaml.safe_load(boolean_yaml)

        for value in loaded['true_values']:
            self.assertTrue(value)
        for value in loaded['false_values']:
            self.assertFalse(value)

    def test_validate_required_config_fields(self):
        """Test validation of required configuration fields."""
        required_fields = ['id', 'message', 'languages', 'severity']

        for field in required_fields:
            with self.subTest(missing_field=field):
                incomplete_config = self.valid_yaml_content.copy()
                del incomplete_config[field]
                with self.assertRaises(KeyError):
                    _ = incomplete_config[field]

    def test_config_severity_levels(self):
        """Test validation of severity levels."""
        valid_severities = ['error', 'warning', 'info', 'hint']
        invalid_severities = ['critical', 'debug', 'verbose', 'unknown']

        for severity in valid_severities:
            config = self.valid_yaml_content.copy()
            config['severity'] = severity
            self.assertIn(config['severity'], valid_severities)

        for severity in invalid_severities:
            config = self.valid_yaml_content.copy()
            config['severity'] = severity
            self.assertNotIn(config['severity'], valid_severities)

    def test_config_languages_validation(self):
        """Test validation of supported languages."""
        valid_languages = ['c', 'cpp', 'python', 'javascript', 'java', 'rust']

        config = self.valid_yaml_content.copy()
        config['languages'] = ['python']
        self.assertIsInstance(config['languages'], list)
        for lang in config['languages']:
            self.assertIn(lang, valid_languages)

        config['languages'] = []
        self.assertEqual(len(config['languages']), 0)

    def test_config_rule_structure_validation(self):
        """Test validation of rule structure."""
        required_rule_fields = ['kind']

        rule = self.valid_yaml_content['rule']
        for field in required_rule_fields:
            self.assertIn(field, rule)

        if 'has' in rule:
            self.assertIsInstance(rule['has'], dict)
            if 'kind' in rule['has']:
                self.assertIsInstance(rule['has']['kind'], str)

    def test_yaml_security_safe_load(self):
        """Test that YAML loading uses safe_load to prevent code execution."""
        dangerous_yaml_cases = [
            "!!python/object/apply:os.system ['echo hacked']",
            "!!python/object/apply:subprocess.call [['rm', '-rf', '/']]",
            "!!python/module:os",
        ]

        for dangerous_yaml in dangerous_yaml_cases:
            with self.subTest(dangerous_yaml=dangerous_yaml):
                with self.assertRaises(yaml.constructor.ConstructorError):
                    yaml.safe_load(dangerous_yaml)

        safe_yaml = "key: value\nnested:\n  item: test"
        result = yaml.safe_load(safe_yaml)
        self.assertEqual(result, {'key': 'value', 'nested': {'item': 'test'}})

    def test_large_yaml_config_performance(self):
        """Test performance with large YAML configuration files."""
        large_config = {}
        for i in range(1000):
            large_config[f'rule_{i}'] = {
                'id': f'rule-{i}',
                'message': f'Rule number {i}',
                'languages': ['python', 'javascript'],
                'severity': 'warning',
                'rule': {
                    'kind': 'function_definition',
                    'has': {
                        'kind': 'identifier',
                        'regex': f'^test_{i}.*$'
                    }
                }
            }

        start_time = time.time()
        yaml_content = yaml.dump(large_config)
        dump_time = time.time() - start_time

        start_time = time.time()
        loaded = yaml.safe_load(yaml_content)
        load_time = time.time() - start_time

        self.assertLess(dump_time, 2.0)
        self.assertLess(load_time, 2.0)
        self.assertEqual(len(loaded), 1000)

    def test_yaml_config_memory_usage(self):
        """Test memory efficiency with nested configurations."""
        deeply_nested_config = {'level_0': {}}
        current_level = deeply_nested_config['level_0']

        for i in range(1, 100):
            current_level[f'level_{i}'] = {}
            current_level = current_level[f'level_{i}']

        current_level['final_value'] = 'deep_nested_value'

        yaml_content = yaml.dump(deeply_nested_config)
        loaded = yaml.safe_load(yaml_content)

        current = loaded['level_0']
        for i in range(1, 100):
            current = current[f'level_{i}']

        self.assertEqual(current['final_value'], 'deep_nested_value')

    def test_yaml_config_file_permissions(self):
        """Test handling of YAML files with different permissions."""
        config_file = os.path.join(self.temp_dir, 'restricted.yaml')
        with open(config_file, 'w') as f:
            yaml.dump(self.valid_yaml_content, f)

        # readable file
        os.chmod(config_file, 0o644)
        with open(config_file, 'r') as f:
            config = yaml.safe_load(f)
        self.assertIsNotNone(config)

        # unreadable file (skip on Windows)
        if os.name != 'nt':
            os.chmod(config_file, 0o000)
            with self.assertRaises((PermissionError, yaml.YAMLError)):
                with open(config_file, 'r') as f:
                    yaml.safe_load(f)

    @patch('builtins.open', new_callable=mock_open, read_data='id: test\nmessage: mocked')
    def test_yaml_config_with_mocked_file(self, mock_file):
        """Test YAML configuration loading with mocked file operations."""
        config = yaml.safe_load(mock_file.return_value)
        self.assertEqual(config, {'id': 'test', 'message': 'mocked'})
        mock_file.assert_called_once()

    def test_yaml_config_encoding_handling(self):
        """Test YAML configuration with different encodings."""
        utf8_config = {
            'message': 'Hello 世界',
            'description': 'Test with émojis: 🚀 🎉',
            'path': '/usr/bin/测试'
        }
        yaml_content = yaml.dump(utf8_config, allow_unicode=True)
        loaded = yaml.safe_load(yaml_content)
        self.assertEqual(loaded['message'], 'Hello 世界')
        self.assertIn('🚀', loaded['description'])

    def test_yaml_anchors_and_references(self):
        """Test YAML anchors and references functionality."""
        yaml_with_anchors = """
        defaults: &defaults
          severity: warning
          languages: [python]

        rule1:
          <<: *defaults
          id: rule-1
          message: First rule

        rule2:
          <<: *defaults
          id: rule-2
          message: Second rule
          severity: error
        """

        loaded = yaml.safe_load(yaml_with_anchors)

        self.assertEqual(loaded['rule1']['severity'], 'warning')
        self.assertEqual(loaded['rule1']['languages'], ['python'])
        self.assertEqual(loaded['rule2']['languages'], ['python'])
        self.assertEqual(loaded['rule2']['severity'], 'error')

    def test_yaml_multiline_strings(self):
        """Test different multiline string formats in YAML."""
        multiline_yaml = """
        literal_block: |
          This is a literal block
          that preserves line breaks
          and trailing spaces.

        folded_block: >
          This is a folded block
          that folds line breaks
          into spaces but preserves
          paragraph breaks.

        quoted_multiline: "This is a quoted
          multiline string that
          preserves formatting."
        """

        loaded = yaml.safe_load(multiline_yaml)

        self.assertIn('\n', loaded['literal_block'])
        self.assertIn('preserves line breaks', loaded['literal_block'])
        self.assertIn('folds line breaks into spaces', loaded['folded_block'])
        self.assertIn('\n', loaded['quoted_multiline'])


if __name__ == '__main__':
    unittest.main(verbosity=2)

This is a new file.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2025

Here are the copyable unit test edits:

Copyable Edits

test/yamlConfigValidation.test.js

const yaml = require('js-yaml');
const fs = require('fs');
const path = require('path');
const { validateYamlConfig, validateSchema, loadConfig } = require('../src/yamlConfigValidation');

describe('YAML Configuration Validation', () => {
  let tempDir;
  let validConfigPath;
  let invalidConfigPath;

  beforeEach(() => {
    tempDir = path.join(__dirname, 'temp-test-configs');
    if (!fs.existsSync(tempDir)) {
      fs.mkdirSync(tempDir, { recursive: true });
    }
    validConfigPath = path.join(tempDir, 'valid-config.yaml');
    invalidConfigPath = path.join(tempDir, 'invalid-config.yaml');
  });

  afterEach(() => {
    if (fs.existsSync(tempDir)) {
      fs.rmSync(tempDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
    }
  });

  describe('validateYamlConfig - Happy Path', () => {
    test('should validate a basic valid YAML configuration', () => {
      const validConfig = {
        name: 'test-app',
        version: '1.0.0',
        environment: 'development',
        database: {
          host: 'localhost',
          port: 5432,
          name: 'test_db'
        }
      };
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yaml.dump(validConfig));
      expect(() => validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath)).not.toThrow();
      const result = validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
      expect(result.errors).toHaveLength(0);
    });

    test('should validate complex nested configuration', () => {
      const complexConfig = {
        application: {
          name: 'complex-app',
          settings: {
            debug: true,
            logging: {
              level: 'info',
              outputs: ['console', 'file'],
              file: {
                path: '/var/log/app.log',
                maxSize: '10MB'
              }
            }
          }
        },
        services: [
          { name: 'redis', port: 6379 },
          { name: 'elasticsearch', port: 9200 }
        ]
      };
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yaml.dump(complexConfig));
      const result = validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
      expect(result.config).toEqual(complexConfig);
    });

    test('should handle empty valid YAML file', () => {
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, '{}');
      const result = validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
      expect(result.config).toEqual({});
    });
  });

  describe('validateYamlConfig - Edge Cases and Errors', () => {
    test('should handle non-existent file gracefully', () => {
      const nonExistentPath = path.join(tempDir, 'does-not-exist.yaml');
      expect(() => validateYamlConfig(nonExistentPath)).toThrow('File not found');
    });

    test('should reject invalid YAML syntax', () => {
      const invalidYaml = `
        name: test-app
        version: 1.0.0
        invalid: [unclosed array
        another: value
      `;
      fs.writeFileSync(invalidConfigPath, invalidYaml);
      const result = validateYamlConfig(invalidConfigPath);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(false);
      expect(result.errors).toContain(expect.stringMatching(/yaml.*syntax/i));
    });

    test('should handle malformed JSON-like YAML', () => {
      const malformedConfig = `
        {
          "name": "test",
          "version": "1.0.0"
          "missing_comma": true
        }
      `;
      fs.writeFileSync(invalidConfigPath, malformedConfig);
      const result = validateYamlConfig(invalidConfigPath);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(false);
    });

    test('should handle binary file input', () => {
      const binaryData = Buffer.from([0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0xFF]);
      fs.writeFileSync(invalidConfigPath, binaryData);
      const result = validateYamlConfig(invalidConfigPath);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(false);
      expect(result.errors).toContain(expect.stringMatching(/invalid.*format/i));
    });

    test('should handle extremely large YAML files', () => {
      const largeConfig = {
        items: new Array(10000).fill(null).map((_, i) => ({
          id: i,
          name: `item-${i}`,
          data: `data-${i}`.repeat(100)
        }))
      };
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yaml.dump(largeConfig));
      const result = validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
      expect(result.config.items).toHaveLength(10000);
    });

    test('should handle null and undefined values', () => {
      const configWithNulls = {
        name: 'test',
        value: null,
        undefined_value: undefined,
        empty_string: '',
        zero: 0,
        false_value: false
      };
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yaml.dump(configWithNulls));
      const result = validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
      expect(result.config.value).toBeNull();
      expect(result.config.empty_string).toBe('');
      expect(result.config.zero).toBe(0);
      expect(result.config.false_value).toBe(false);
    });
  });

  describe('validateSchema', () => {
    const basicSchema = {
      type: 'object',
      required: ['name', 'version'],
      properties: {
        name: { type: 'string' },
        version: { type: 'string' },
        environment: { type: 'string', enum: ['development', 'staging', 'production'] }
      }
    };

    test('should validate config against valid schema', () => {
      const config = {
        name: 'test-app',
        version: '1.0.0',
        environment: 'development'
      };
      const result = validateSchema(config, basicSchema);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
      expect(result.errors).toHaveLength(0);
    });

    test('should reject config missing required fields', () => {
      const config = {
        name: 'test-app'
      };
      const result = validateSchema(config, basicSchema);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(false);
      expect(result.errors).toContain(expect.stringMatching(/version.*required/i));
    });

    test('should validate nested object schemas', () => {
      const nestedSchema = {
        type: 'object',
        required: ['database'],
        properties: {
          database: {
            type: 'object',
            required: ['host', 'port'],
            properties: {
              host: { type: 'string' },
              port: { type: 'number', minimum: 1, maximum: 65535 }
            }
          }
        }
      };
      const validNestedConfig = {
        database: {
          host: 'localhost',
          port: 5432
        }
      };
      const result = validateSchema(validNestedConfig, nestedSchema);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
    });

    test('should reject invalid enum values', () => {
      const config = {
        name: 'test-app',
        version: '1.0.0',
        environment: 'invalid-env'
      };
      const result = validateSchema(config, basicSchema);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(false);
      expect(result.errors).toContain(expect.stringMatching(/environment.*enum/i));
    });

    test('should handle array validation', () => {
      const arraySchema = {
        type: 'object',
        properties: {
          services: {
            type: 'array',
            items: {
              type: 'object',
              required: ['name', 'port'],
              properties: {
                name: { type: 'string' },
                port: { type: 'number' }
              }
            }
          }
        }
      };
      const validArrayConfig = {
        services: [
          { name: 'redis', port: 6379 },
          { name: 'postgres', port: 5432 }
        ]
      };
      const result = validateSchema(validArrayConfig, arraySchema);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
    });
  });

  describe('loadConfig', () => {
    test('should load and return parsed YAML config', () => {
      const config = {
        app: 'test',
        version: '1.0.0'
      };
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yaml.dump(config));
      const loaded = loadConfig(validConfigPath);
      expect(loaded).toEqual(config);
    });

    test('should handle config with comments', () => {
      const yamlWithComments = `
        # Application configuration
        name: test-app  # Application name
        version: 1.0.0  # Version number

        # Database settings
        database:
          host: localhost  # Database host
          port: 5432      # Database port
      `;
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yamlWithComments);
      const loaded = loadConfig(validConfigPath);
      expect(loaded.name).toBe('test-app');
      expect(loaded.version).toBe('1.0.0');
      expect(loaded.database.host).toBe('localhost');
      expect(loaded.database.port).toBe(5432);
    });

    test('should handle multiline strings', () => {
      const yamlWithMultiline = `
        description: |
          This is a multiline
          description that spans
          multiple lines
        folded_description: >
          This is a folded
          description that will
          be on one line
      `;
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yamlWithMultiline);
      const loaded = loadConfig(validConfigPath);
      expect(loaded.description).toMatch(/This is a multiline\ndescription/);
      expect(loaded.folded_description).toBe('This is a folded description that will be on one line');
    });

    test('should preserve data types correctly', () => {
      const typedConfig = {
        string_value: 'hello',
        number_value: 42,
        float_value: 3.14,
        boolean_true: true,
        boolean_false: false,
        null_value: null,
        array_value: [1, 2, 3],
        object_value: { nested: 'value' }
      };
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yaml.dump(typedConfig));
      const loaded = loadConfig(validConfigPath);
      expect(typeof loaded.string_value).toBe('string');
      expect(typeof loaded.number_value).toBe('number');
      expect(typeof loaded.float_value).toBe('number');
      expect(typeof loaded.boolean_true).toBe('boolean');
      expect(typeof loaded.boolean_false).toBe('boolean');
      expect(loaded.null_value).toBeNull();
      expect(Array.isArray(loaded.array_value)).toBe(true);
      expect(typeof loaded.object_value).toBe('object');
    });

    test('should throw error for non-existent file', () => {
      const nonExistentPath = path.join(tempDir, 'missing.yaml');
      expect(() => loadConfig(nonExistentPath)).toThrow();
    });
  });

  describe('Performance and Stress Tests', () => {
    test('should handle rapid successive validations', () => {
      const config = { name: 'test', version: '1.0.0' };
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yaml.dump(config));
      const start = Date.now();
      for (let i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
        const result = validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath);
        expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
      }
      const end = Date.now();
      expect(end - start).toBeLessThan(5000);
    });

    test('should handle deeply nested objects', () => {
      let deepConfig = {};
      let current = deepConfig;
      for (let i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
        current[`level${i}`] = {};
        current = current[`level${i}`];
      }
      current.value = 'deep';
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yaml.dump(deepConfig));
      const result = validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
    });

    test('should handle configuration with many properties', () => {
      const wideConfig = {};
      for (let i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
        wideConfig[`property${i}`] = `value${i}`;
      }
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yaml.dump(wideConfig));
      const result = validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
      expect(Object.keys(result.config)).toHaveLength(1000);
    });
  });

  describe('Security and Input Validation', () => {
    test('should safely handle potential YAML bombs', () => {
      const potentialBomb = `
        a: &anchor
          - item1
          - item2
        b: *anchor
        c: *anchor
      `;
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, potentialBomb);
      expect(() => {
        const result = validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath);
        expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
      }).not.toThrow();
    });

    test('should handle special characters and unicode', () => {
      const unicodeConfig = {
        name: 'тест',
        emoji: '🚀',
        special: '!@#$%^&*()',
        chinese: '你好',
        arabic: 'مرحبا'
      };
      fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yaml.dump(unicodeConfig));
      const result = validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath);
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
      expect(result.config.name).toBe('тест');
      expect(result.config.emoji).toBe('🚀');
    });
  });
});

describe('Integration and Mocking Tests', () => {
  let originalConsoleError;
  let mockFs;

  beforeEach(() => {
    originalConsoleError = console.error;
    console.error = jest.fn();
  });

  afterEach(() => {
    console.error = originalConsoleError;
    if (mockFs) {
      mockFs.restore();
    }
  });

  test('should handle filesystem errors gracefully', () => {
    const mockReadFileSync = jest.spyOn(fs, 'readFileSync').mockImplementation(() => {
      throw new Error('Permission denied');
    });
    const result = validateYamlConfig('some-path.yaml');
    expect(result.isValid).toBe(false);
    expect(result.errors).toContain(expect.stringMatching(/permission.*denied/i));
    mockReadFileSync.mockRestore();
  });

  test('should log appropriate warnings for deprecated configurations', () => {
    const deprecatedConfig = {
      name: 'test',
      version: '1.0.0',
      deprecated_field: 'should warn'
    };
    fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yaml.dump(deprecatedConfig));
    const result = validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath);
    expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
    expect(result.warnings).toContain(expect.stringMatching(/deprecated_field.*deprecated/i));
  });

  test('should handle concurrent file access', async () => {
    const config = { name: 'concurrent-test', version: '1.0.0' };
    fs.writeFileSync(validConfigPath, yaml.dump(config));
    const promises = Array(10).fill(null).map(() =>
      Promise.resolve(validateYamlConfig(validConfigPath))
    );
    const results = await Promise.all(promises);
    results.forEach(result => {
      expect(result.isValid).toBe(true);
    });
  });
});

This is a new file.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2025

UTG Post-Process Complete

No new issues were detected in the generated code and all check runs have completed. The unit test generation process has completed successfully.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 21, 2025

Creating a PR to put the unit tests in...

The changes have been created in this pull request: View PR

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 34

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
test/dotnet-test.yml (1)

13-45: Add trailing newline at end of file.

Ensure the workflow file ends with a single newline to comply with POSIX standards.

nix/flake-check.yml (1)

32-32: Add newline at end of file.

Include a trailing newline to satisfy POSIX conventions.

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
git/sync/sync_config.json (1)

24-24: Fix JSON structure: add missing closing braces
The file ends abruptly; it needs closing braces for the ado object and the root. Example:

     }
   }
+  }
+}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61437fa and 25967d0.

📒 Files selected for processing (17)
  • deploy/Deploy-ssh.yml (1 hunks)
  • deploy/aws/ecs.yml (1 hunks)
  • deploy/docker/docker-publish.yml (1 hunks)
  • git/lint/.commitlintrc.json (1 hunks)
  • git/lint/lint-commits.yml (1 hunks)
  • git/release/.releaserc.json (1 hunks)
  • git/release/changelog.yml (1 hunks)
  • git/sync/sync-with-azure.yml (1 hunks)
  • git/sync/sync_config.json (1 hunks)
  • nix/flake-check.yml (1 hunks)
  • nodejs/Auto_Increment_Version.yml (1 hunks)
  • openapi/Publish_API_Docs.yml (1 hunks)
  • test/Docker.yml (1 hunks)
  • test/dotnet-test.yml (1 hunks)
  • test/flutter-test.yml (1 hunks)
  • test/laravel-test.yml (1 hunks)
  • test/nodejs-test.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)
test/Docker.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 13-13: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 40-40: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

test/flutter-test.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 13-13: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 44-44: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

git/lint/lint-commits.yml

[warning] 2-2: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 18-18: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

git/release/changelog.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 35-35: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

test/laravel-test.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 13-13: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 48-48: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

deploy/Deploy-ssh.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 37-37: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 38-38: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

test/dotnet-test.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 13-13: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)

nodejs/Auto_Increment_Version.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 31-31: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 56-56: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

test/nodejs-test.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 13-13: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 47-47: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

openapi/Publish_API_Docs.yml

[warning] 2-2: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 39-39: too many blank lines

(1 > 0) (empty-lines)

git/sync/sync-with-azure.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 16-16: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 21-21: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

deploy/docker/docker-publish.yml

[warning] 8-8: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 12-12: too many spaces inside brackets

(brackets)


[error] 12-12: too many spaces inside brackets

(brackets)


[error] 14-14: too many spaces inside brackets

(brackets)


[error] 14-14: too many spaces inside brackets

(brackets)


[error] 16-16: too many spaces inside brackets

(brackets)


[error] 16-16: too many spaces inside brackets

(brackets)


[warning] 44-44: too few spaces before comment: expected 2

(comments)


[warning] 44-44: missing starting space in comment

(comments)


[warning] 52-52: too few spaces before comment: expected 2

(comments)


[warning] 58-58: too few spaces before comment: expected 2

(comments)


[warning] 68-68: too few spaces before comment: expected 2

(comments)


[warning] 76-76: too few spaces before comment: expected 2

(comments)


[error] 98-98: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

deploy/aws/ecs.yml

[warning] 3-3: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 13-13: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)


[error] 41-41: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
git/sync/sync_config.json

[error] 24-24: expected } but instead the file ends

the file ends here

(parse)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
git/lint/.commitlintrc.json (1)

1-69: Well-structured Commitlint configuration
All rules and parser options align with the desired commit message standards. No issues found.

git/release/.releaserc.json (1)

1-27: Approve: semantic-release configuration is correctly set up.

The branches and plugins are defined as expected, and the [skip ci] flag in the Git plugin commit message prevents unintended CI reruns.

git/sync/sync-with-azure.yml (1)

21-21: ```shell
#!/bin/bash

Search for any occurrences of sync_config.json in the repo

echo "Using ripgrep:"
rg --files | grep 'sync_config.json' || true

echo "Using find:"
find . -type f -name 'sync_config.json'


</details>
<details>
<summary>git/lint/lint-commits.yml (1)</summary>

`2-2`: **Ignore false-positive truthy warning.**  
The `on.pull_request` trigger is valid GitHub Actions syntax; the YAMLlint `truthy value` warning can be safely ignored.

</details>
<details>
<summary>git/release/changelog.yml (1)</summary>

`3-3`: **Ignore false-positive truthy warning.**  
The `on` block syntax is correct for GitHub Actions; the YAMLlint warning is not applicable.

</details>
<details>
<summary>deploy/Deploy-ssh.yml (1)</summary>

`29-32`: **Clarify repository clone path.**  
The current `git clone ${{ secrets.REPO_URL }}` may place code at the runner’s home. Ensure it aligns with the subsequent `cd Docker` step or explicitly clone into the `Docker` directory:
```diff
-              git clone ${{ secrets.REPO_URL }}
+              git clone ${{ secrets.REPO_URL }} Docker
nodejs/Auto_Increment_Version.yml (1)

1-6: Workflow name and triggers look accurate
The “Check and Increment Version” workflow is properly scoped to pull_request events (opened, synchronize, reopened).

with:
projectBaseDir: .
env:
SONAR_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }} No newline at end of file
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Add missing newline at EOF
Ensure the workflow ends with a single newline character for POSIX compliance.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[error] 44-44: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test/flutter-test.yml at line 44, the file is missing a newline character at
the end. Add a single newline character after the last line to ensure POSIX
compliance and proper file formatting.

Comment on lines +12 to +14
steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v3
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix YAML indentation for steps
List items under steps must be indented two additional spaces (6 spaces total) to adhere to YAML syntax.

Apply:

-    steps:
-    - name: Checkout code
+    steps:
+      - name: Checkout code
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v3
steps:
- name: Checkout code
uses: actions/checkout@v3
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[error] 13-13: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test/flutter-test.yml around lines 12 to 14, the list item under the steps
key is incorrectly indented with 4 spaces instead of the required 6 spaces. Fix
the YAML indentation by adding two more spaces before the dash and the following
lines under steps, ensuring the list items are indented 6 spaces total to comply
with YAML syntax.

with:
projectBaseDir: .
env:
SONAR_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SONAR_TOKEN }} No newline at end of file
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Add missing newline at EOF
End the file with a single newline character to satisfy POSIX and YAML parsers.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[error] 48-48: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test/laravel-test.yml at line 48, the file is missing a newline character at
the end. Add a single newline character after the last line to ensure the file
ends with a newline, complying with POSIX standards and YAML parser
requirements.

runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
- name: Checkout code
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix YAML indentation for steps
The step list item is under-indented. It should have 6 spaces before - name:

-    - name: Checkout code
+      - name: Checkout code
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Checkout code
- name: Checkout code
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[error] 13-13: wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4

(indentation)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In test/laravel-test.yml at line 13, the step list item '- name: Checkout code'
is under-indented. Adjust the indentation to have exactly 6 spaces before '-
name' to align properly within the steps list.


- name: Publish API
run: scalar registry version scalar-galaxy ./openapi/galaxy.yaml --namespace "$NAMESPACE"

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Remove extra blank line at EOF
YAML expects zero trailing blank lines; please delete the empty line at the end.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[error] 39-39: too many blank lines

(1 > 0) (empty-lines)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In openapi/Publish_API_Docs.yml at line 39, there is an extra blank line at the
end of the file. Remove this trailing blank line to comply with YAML formatting
rules that expect no trailing blank lines at EOF.

Comment on lines +24 to +31
- name: Compare package.json versions
id: compare-versions
run: |
MAIN_VERSION=$(jq -r .version main-branch/package.json)
PR_VERSION=$(jq -r .version pr-branch/package.json)
echo "Main branch version: $MAIN_VERSION"
echo "PR branch version: $PR_VERSION"

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Explicitly install jq for portability
While jq is available on Ubuntu runners, pinning its installation ensures this workflow runs consistently across environments:

-      - name: Compare package.json versions
+      - name: Ensure `jq` is installed
+        run: sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y jq
+
+      - name: Compare package.json versions
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Compare package.json versions
id: compare-versions
run: |
MAIN_VERSION=$(jq -r .version main-branch/package.json)
PR_VERSION=$(jq -r .version pr-branch/package.json)
echo "Main branch version: $MAIN_VERSION"
echo "PR branch version: $PR_VERSION"
- name: Ensure `jq` is installed
run: sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install -y jq
- name: Compare package.json versions
id: compare-versions
run: |
MAIN_VERSION=$(jq -r .version main-branch/package.json)
PR_VERSION=$(jq -r .version pr-branch/package.json)
echo "Main branch version: $MAIN_VERSION"
echo "PR branch version: $PR_VERSION"
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[error] 31-31: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In nodejs/Auto_Increment_Version.yml around lines 24 to 31, the workflow uses
the jq tool without explicitly installing it, which may cause failures in
environments where jq is not pre-installed. To fix this, add a step before using
jq to explicitly install it, for example by running a package manager command
like 'sudo apt-get install -y jq' on Ubuntu runners, ensuring consistent
availability of jq across all environments.

DIGEST: ${{ steps.build-and-push.outputs.digest }}
# This step uses the identity token to provision an ephemeral certificate
# against the sigstore community Fulcio instance.
run: echo "${TAGS}" | xargs -I {} cosign sign --yes {}@${DIGEST} No newline at end of file
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Add newline at EOF
Ensure a single newline at end of file to comply with POSIX and YAML lint.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[error] 98-98: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In deploy/docker/docker-publish.yml at line 98, the file is missing a newline at
the end. Add a single newline character after the last line to comply with POSIX
standards and YAML linting requirements.

Comment on lines +8 to +16
on:
schedule:
- cron: '27 1 * * *'
push:
branches: [ "main" ]
# Publish semver tags as releases.
tags: [ 'v*.*.*' ]
pull_request:
branches: [ "main" ]
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Simplify array syntax for branch and tag filters
YAML lint flags “too many spaces inside brackets”. Update to remove spaces:

- branches: [ "main" ]
+ branches: ["main"]

- tags: [ 'v*.*.*' ]
+ tags: ['v*.*.*']

- branches: [ "main" ]
+ branches: ["main"]
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
on:
schedule:
- cron: '27 1 * * *'
push:
branches: [ "main" ]
# Publish semver tags as releases.
tags: [ 'v*.*.*' ]
pull_request:
branches: [ "main" ]
on:
schedule:
- cron: '27 1 * * *'
push:
branches: ["main"]
# Publish semver tags as releases.
tags: ['v*.*.*']
pull_request:
branches: ["main"]
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[warning] 8-8: truthy value should be one of [false, true]

(truthy)


[error] 12-12: too many spaces inside brackets

(brackets)


[error] 12-12: too many spaces inside brackets

(brackets)


[error] 14-14: too many spaces inside brackets

(brackets)


[error] 14-14: too many spaces inside brackets

(brackets)


[error] 16-16: too many spaces inside brackets

(brackets)


[error] 16-16: too many spaces inside brackets

(brackets)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In deploy/docker/docker-publish.yml around lines 8 to 16, the array syntax for
branches and tags includes spaces inside brackets, which YAML lint flags as an
issue. Remove the spaces inside the brackets for branches and tags arrays to
simplify the syntax and comply with YAML lint rules, changing from [ "main" ] to
["main"] and from [ 'v*.*.*' ] to ['v*.*.*'].

Comment on lines +56 to +64
- name: Log into registry ${{ env.REGISTRY }}
if: github.event_name != 'pull_request'
uses: docker/login-action@343f7c4344506bcbf9b4de18042ae17996df046d # v3.0.0
with:
registry: ${{ env.REGISTRY }}
username: ${{ github.actor }}
password: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}

# Extract metadata (tags, labels) for Docker
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Handle multiple image tags correctly in signing step
The cosign invocation uses xargs, which may not split comma-separated tags properly. Use a loop:

- run: echo "${TAGS}" | xargs -I {} cosign sign --yes {}@${DIGEST}
+ run: |
+   IFS=',' read -ra TAG_LIST <<< "${TAGS}"
+   for tag in "${TAG_LIST[@]}"; do
+     cosign sign --yes "${tag}@${DIGEST}"
+   done

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[warning] 58-58: too few spaces before comment: expected 2

(comments)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In deploy/docker/docker-publish.yml around lines 56 to 64, the cosign signing
step uses xargs to handle image tags, which may not correctly split
comma-separated tags. Replace the xargs usage with a loop that iterates over
each tag individually to ensure all tags are signed properly. Adjust the script
to parse the tags string by commas and sign each tag in a separate cosign
command.

Comment on lines +42 to +47
- name: Install cosign
if: github.event_name != 'pull_request'
uses: sigstore/cosign-installer@59acb6260d9c0ba8f4a2f9d9b48431a222b68e20 #v3.5.0
with:
cosign-release: 'v2.2.4'

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Standardize inline comment spacing
Ensure two spaces before inline comments and a leading space after #:

- uses: sigstore/cosign-installer@59acb6260d9c0ba8f4a2f9d9b48431a222b68e20 #v3.5.0
+ uses: sigstore/cosign-installer@59acb6260d9c0ba8f4a2f9d9b48431a222b68e20  # v3.5.0

- uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@f95db51fddba0c2d1ec667646a06c2ce06100226 # v3.0.0
+ uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@f95db51fddba0c2d1ec667646a06c2ce06100226  # v3.0.0

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.37.1)

[warning] 44-44: too few spaces before comment: expected 2

(comments)


[warning] 44-44: missing starting space in comment

(comments)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In deploy/docker/docker-publish.yml around lines 42 to 47, the inline comment
after the uses statement does not have standardized spacing. Add two spaces
before the inline comment and ensure there is a single space after the # symbol
to follow the standard formatting for inline comments.

This workflow automates the semantic release and Android APK build process, including version management, APK signing, and uploading the release to GitHub.
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 25967d0 and 539321d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • build/Android-deploy.yml (1 hunks)

Comment on lines +14 to +89
jobs:
release:
name: 🚀 Semantic Release & Build
runs-on: ubuntu-latest

steps:
# 🧩 Checkout the repository
- name: Checkout repo
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0

# ⚙️ Setup Node.js for release management
- name: Setup Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: "lts/*"

# 🧰 Install semantic-release and plugins
- name: Install release tools
run: |
npm install -g semantic-release \
@semantic-release/changelog \
@semantic-release/git \
@semantic-release/commit-analyzer \
@semantic-release/release-notes-generator \
@semantic-release/github

# 🏷️ Run semantic-release to manage versions
- name: Run semantic-release (dry-run to get next version)
id: semantic
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
VERSION=$(npx semantic-release --dry-run | grep "The next release version is" | awk '{print $NF}')
echo "version=$VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT || echo "version=0.0.0" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

# 🧱 Setup Java (required for Android build)
- name: Setup Java
uses: actions/setup-java@v4
with:
distribution: temurin
java-version: 17

# 🧩 Setup Gradle
- name: Setup Gradle
uses: gradle/actions/setup-gradle@v3

# 🏗️ Build the APK (Release)
- name: Build APK
run: ./gradlew assembleRelease

# 🔏 Sign the generated APK
- name: Sign APK
uses: r0adkll/sign-android-release@v1
with:
releaseDirectory: app/build/outputs/apk/release
signingKeyBase64: ${{ secrets.SIGNING_KEY }}
alias: ${{ secrets.ALIAS }}
keyStorePassword: ${{ secrets.KEY_STORE_PASSWORD }}
keyPassword: ${{ secrets.KEY_PASSWORD }}

# 🧩 Rename APK with version for clarity
- name: Rename APK with version
run: |
VERSION=${{ steps.semantic.outputs.version }}
mkdir -p dist
cp app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release-signed.apk dist/app-release-v${VERSION}.apk
echo "APK_NAME=app-release-v${VERSION}.apk" >> $GITHUB_ENV

# 🏷️ Run semantic-release to publish release and attach APK
- name: Run semantic-release and upload APK
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
npx semantic-release --assets "dist/${APK_NAME}"
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Recommended: Add job concurrency control to prevent duplicate releases.

Multiple pushes to the main branch can trigger concurrent workflow runs, risking:

  1. Duplicate release versions or releases.
  2. Race conditions in semantic-release state.

Add concurrency control to serialize releases:

 jobs:
   release:
     name: 🚀 Semantic Release & Build
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    concurrency:
+      group: android-release
+      cancel-in-progress: false
 
     steps:
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
jobs:
release:
name: 🚀 Semantic Release & Build
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
# 🧩 Checkout the repository
- name: Checkout repo
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
# ⚙️ Setup Node.js for release management
- name: Setup Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: "lts/*"
# 🧰 Install semantic-release and plugins
- name: Install release tools
run: |
npm install -g semantic-release \
@semantic-release/changelog \
@semantic-release/git \
@semantic-release/commit-analyzer \
@semantic-release/release-notes-generator \
@semantic-release/github
# 🏷️ Run semantic-release to manage versions
- name: Run semantic-release (dry-run to get next version)
id: semantic
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
VERSION=$(npx semantic-release --dry-run | grep "The next release version is" | awk '{print $NF}')
echo "version=$VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT || echo "version=0.0.0" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
# 🧱 Setup Java (required for Android build)
- name: Setup Java
uses: actions/setup-java@v4
with:
distribution: temurin
java-version: 17
# 🧩 Setup Gradle
- name: Setup Gradle
uses: gradle/actions/setup-gradle@v3
# 🏗️ Build the APK (Release)
- name: Build APK
run: ./gradlew assembleRelease
# 🔏 Sign the generated APK
- name: Sign APK
uses: r0adkll/sign-android-release@v1
with:
releaseDirectory: app/build/outputs/apk/release
signingKeyBase64: ${{ secrets.SIGNING_KEY }}
alias: ${{ secrets.ALIAS }}
keyStorePassword: ${{ secrets.KEY_STORE_PASSWORD }}
keyPassword: ${{ secrets.KEY_PASSWORD }}
# 🧩 Rename APK with version for clarity
- name: Rename APK with version
run: |
VERSION=${{ steps.semantic.outputs.version }}
mkdir -p dist
cp app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release-signed.apk dist/app-release-v${VERSION}.apk
echo "APK_NAME=app-release-v${VERSION}.apk" >> $GITHUB_ENV
# 🏷️ Run semantic-release to publish release and attach APK
- name: Run semantic-release and upload APK
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
npx semantic-release --assets "dist/${APK_NAME}"
jobs:
release:
name: 🚀 Semantic Release & Build
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
concurrency:
group: android-release
cancel-in-progress: false
steps:
# 🧩 Checkout the repository
- name: Checkout repo
uses: actions/checkout@v4
with:
fetch-depth: 0
# ⚙️ Setup Node.js for release management
- name: Setup Node.js
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: "lts/*"
# 🧰 Install semantic-release and plugins
- name: Install release tools
run: |
npm install -g semantic-release \
@semantic-release/changelog \
@semantic-release/git \
@semantic-release/commit-analyzer \
@semantic-release/release-notes-generator \
@semantic-release/github
# 🏷️ Run semantic-release to manage versions
- name: Run semantic-release (dry-run to get next version)
id: semantic
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
VERSION=$(npx semantic-release --dry-run | grep "The next release version is" | awk '{print $NF}')
echo "version=$VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT || echo "version=0.0.0" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
# 🧱 Setup Java (required for Android build)
- name: Setup Java
uses: actions/setup-java@v4
with:
distribution: temurin
java-version: 17
# 🧩 Setup Gradle
- name: Setup Gradle
uses: gradle/actions/setup-gradle@v3
# 🏗️ Build the APK (Release)
- name: Build APK
run: ./gradlew assembleRelease
# 🔏 Sign the generated APK
- name: Sign APK
uses: r0adkll/sign-android-release@v1
with:
releaseDirectory: app/build/outputs/apk/release
signingKeyBase64: ${{ secrets.SIGNING_KEY }}
alias: ${{ secrets.ALIAS }}
keyStorePassword: ${{ secrets.KEY_STORE_PASSWORD }}
keyPassword: ${{ secrets.KEY_PASSWORD }}
# 🧩 Rename APK with version for clarity
- name: Rename APK with version
run: |
VERSION=${{ steps.semantic.outputs.version }}
mkdir -p dist
cp app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release-signed.apk dist/app-release-v${VERSION}.apk
echo "APK_NAME=app-release-v${VERSION}.apk" >> $GITHUB_ENV
# 🏷️ Run semantic-release to publish release and attach APK
- name: Run semantic-release and upload APK
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
npx semantic-release --assets "dist/${APK_NAME}"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In build/Android-deploy.yml around lines 14 to 89, the workflow lacks
concurrency control which can allow concurrent runs to produce duplicate
semantic releases; add a concurrency stanza to the release job to serialize runs
(e.g. jobs.release.concurrency with a group that includes the ref or workflow
name like release-${{ github.ref }} and cancel-in-progress: true) so only one
release job runs per branch/ref and in-progress runs are cancelled when a new
run starts.

Comment on lines +43 to +49
- name: Run semantic-release (dry-run to get next version)
id: semantic
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
VERSION=$(npx semantic-release --dry-run | grep "The next release version is" | awk '{print $NF}')
echo "version=$VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT || echo "version=0.0.0" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Major: Semantic-release executed twice with risk of version mismatch.

The workflow runs semantic-release twice: once as dry-run (line 43) to extract the version, and once to publish (line 85). This introduces:

  1. Version mismatch risk: Commits pushed between the two runs could cause semantic-release to compute a different version on the second run.
  2. Inefficiency: semantic-release should be run once; both the version and publish status should be captured in a single invocation.
  3. Complexity: The dry-run → extract version → use version → publish flow is harder to maintain.

Refactor to run semantic-release once and use its structured logging or the generated GITHUB_OUTPUT to determine if a release was generated:

-      - name: Run semantic-release (dry-run to get next version)
-        id: semantic
-        env:
-          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
-        run: |
-          VERSION=$(npx semantic-release --dry-run | grep "The next release version is" | awk '{print $NF}')
-          echo "version=$VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT || echo "version=0.0.0" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
       # ... [Java, Gradle, Build, Sign steps remain unchanged] ...
-      - name: Run semantic-release and upload APK
+      - name: Extract version and prepare APK
+        id: semantic
+        run: |
+          output=$(npx semantic-release --dry-run 2>&1)
+          VERSION=$(echo "$output" | grep "The next release version is" | awk '{print $NF}')
+          echo "version=$VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+
+      - name: Run semantic-release and upload APK
         env:
           GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
         run: |
           npx semantic-release --assets "dist/${APK_NAME}"

Also applies to: 85-89


⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Critical: Fragile semantic-release version parsing with silent failure fallback.

The version extraction logic using grep/awk is unreliable and masks failures:

  1. The grep pattern "The next release version is" is not guaranteed to match semantic-release --dry-run output across all versions.
  2. If the pattern doesn't match, $VERSION is empty, and the fallback || echo "version=0.0.0" silently masks the failure.
  3. There is no validation that version extraction succeeded before proceeding.
  4. If version extraction fails, the APK will be named app-release-v.apk or app-release-v0.0.0.apk (incorrect).

Consider using semantic-release's structured output or a more robust parsing approach. Alternatively, run semantic-release once and capture both the version and success status:

-      - name: Run semantic-release (dry-run to get next version)
-        id: semantic
-        env:
-          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
-        run: |
-          VERSION=$(npx semantic-release --dry-run | grep "The next release version is" | awk '{print $NF}')
-          echo "version=$VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT || echo "version=0.0.0" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
+      - name: Run semantic-release (dry-run to get next version)
+        id: semantic
+        env:
+          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
+        run: |
+          output=$(npx semantic-release --dry-run 2>&1)
+          if echo "$output" | grep -q "The next release version is"; then
+            VERSION=$(echo "$output" | grep "The next release version is" | awk '{print $NF}')
+          else
+            echo "Error: Failed to extract version from semantic-release output"
+            echo "$output"
+            exit 1
+          fi
+          if [[ -z "$VERSION" ]]; then
+            echo "Error: Extracted version is empty"
+            exit 1
+          fi
+          echo "version=$VERSION" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In build/Android-deploy.yml around lines 43–49, the current grep/awk extraction
is brittle and silently falls back to version 0.0.0; instead run
semantic-release once and fail-fast if it doesn't produce a valid semver:
execute semantic-release and capture its output and exit code, parse the output
with a strict semver regex (e.g. /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+(-[0-9A-Za-z.-]+)?$/)
or, preferably, use semantic-release's structured/JSON output or API if
available, validate the parsed version is non-empty and matches semver, write
the validated version to GITHUB_OUTPUT, and exit the job with non-zero status if
extraction fails (do not silently write 0.0.0).

Comment on lines +63 to +64
- name: Build APK
run: ./gradlew assembleRelease
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Major: Build step lacks explicit error handling.

Line 64 runs ./gradlew assembleRelease without explicit error checking. If the Gradle build fails, the workflow continues to the APK signing step with a non-existent APK, causing confusing downstream failures.

Add explicit error handling or let the step fail fast:

       - name: Build APK
-        run: ./gradlew assembleRelease
+        run: |
+          ./gradlew assembleRelease
+          if [[ ! -f app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release-unsigned.apk ]]; then
+            echo "Error: APK not found after build"
+            exit 1
+          fi

Alternatively, use set -e at the workflow level or rely on GitHub Actions' default set -e behavior for run steps (which should already fail on non-zero exit codes).

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Build APK
run: ./gradlew assembleRelease
- name: Build APK
run: |
./gradlew assembleRelease
if [[ ! -f app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release-unsigned.apk ]]; then
echo "Error: APK not found after build"
exit 1
fi
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In build/Android-deploy.yml around lines 63-64, the "Build APK" step runs
./gradlew assembleRelease but doesn't enforce a fail-fast behavior; update the
workflow so the Gradle step fails the job on non-zero exit (e.g., ensure run
steps use set -e or remove any continue-on-error), and add an explicit
post-build verification that the expected APK(s) exist (exit with non-zero and
log an error if missing) before proceeding to the signing step so downstream
steps never run against a nonexistent artifact.

Comment on lines +68 to +74
uses: r0adkll/sign-android-release@v1
with:
releaseDirectory: app/build/outputs/apk/release
signingKeyBase64: ${{ secrets.SIGNING_KEY }}
alias: ${{ secrets.ALIAS }}
keyStorePassword: ${{ secrets.KEY_STORE_PASSWORD }}
keyPassword: ${{ secrets.KEY_PASSWORD }}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

Recommended: Verify r0adkll/sign-android-release action is maintained.

The workflow uses the third-party action r0adkll/sign-android-release@v1. Verify that:

  1. The action is actively maintained and not deprecated.
  2. There are no known security issues or breaking changes.
  3. Consider pinning to a specific commit hash instead of a major version tag for reproducibility.

🌐 Web query:

Is r0adkll/sign-android-release action maintained and current?

💡 Result:

Short answer: No — it appears unmaintained and not current.

Evidence:

  • Latest release is v1 on Nov 7, 2019. [1]
  • The repo has open issues and PRs (examples: a reported breakage in Jan 2024), indicating users still hit problems but no recent release or maintainer response. [2]
  • The action is still listed on the Marketplace but without recent updates. [3]

If you rely on this in CI, consider using a maintained fork or an alternative action (or pin to a commit you vet).

Sources:
[1] r0adkll/sign-android-release (GitHub repo — releases).
[2] Issue "zipalign not found cause signing failure" opened Jan 10, 2024 (repo issues).
[3] "Sign Android release" (GitHub Marketplace entry).


Critical: r0adkll/sign-android-release@v1 is unmaintained and has known issues — replace or update.

The action's latest release is v1 from November 2019 and remains unmaintained. Users have reported breaking changes, including a zipalign failure issue in January 2024, with no recent maintainer response.

Recommended actions:

  1. Migrate to a maintained alternative or a maintained fork.
  2. If continuing with this action, pin to a specific verified commit hash rather than the v1 tag to improve reproducibility and control over potential breakage.

Comment on lines +77 to +82
- name: Rename APK with version
run: |
VERSION=${{ steps.semantic.outputs.version }}
mkdir -p dist
cp app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release-signed.apk dist/app-release-v${VERSION}.apk
echo "APK_NAME=app-release-v${VERSION}.apk" >> $GITHUB_ENV
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Recommended: Validate signed APK exists and verify release directory.

After APK signing (line 68) and before renaming (line 77), add a verification step to confirm the signed APK exists:

       - name: Rename APK with version
         run: |
+          if [[ ! -f app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release-signed.apk ]]; then
+            echo "Error: Signed APK not found"
+            exit 1
+          fi
           VERSION=${{ steps.semantic.outputs.version }}
           mkdir -p dist
           cp app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release-signed.apk dist/app-release-v${VERSION}.apk
+          if [[ ! -f dist/app-release-v${VERSION}.apk ]]; then
+            echo "Error: Failed to copy APK to dist/"
+            exit 1
+          fi
           echo "APK_NAME=app-release-v${VERSION}.apk" >> $GITHUB_ENV
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Rename APK with version
run: |
VERSION=${{ steps.semantic.outputs.version }}
mkdir -p dist
cp app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release-signed.apk dist/app-release-v${VERSION}.apk
echo "APK_NAME=app-release-v${VERSION}.apk" >> $GITHUB_ENV
- name: Rename APK with version
run: |
if [[ ! -f app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release-signed.apk ]]; then
echo "Error: Signed APK not found"
exit 1
fi
VERSION=${{ steps.semantic.outputs.version }}
mkdir -p dist
cp app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release-signed.apk dist/app-release-v${VERSION}.apk
if [[ ! -f dist/app-release-v${VERSION}.apk ]]; then
echo "Error: Failed to copy APK to dist/"
exit 1
fi
echo "APK_NAME=app-release-v${VERSION}.apk" >> $GITHUB_ENV
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In build/Android-deploy.yml around lines 77 to 82, the workflow blindly copies
the signed APK and sets APK_NAME without checking that
app/build/outputs/apk/release/app-release-signed.apk actually exists or that the
dist directory is ready; add a pre-check that verifies the signed APK file
exists and is readable and if not fail the step with a clear error message,
ensure the dist directory is created (mkdir -p dist) before copying, and only
then copy the file and set the GITHUB_ENV variable so the job fails fast and
provides a helpful error when signing/output path is missing.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 539321d and a60efc9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • build/Android-Ios-deploy.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
build/Android-Ios-deploy.yml (3)

138-138: Double-brace syntax error in secret interpolation.

Line 138 contains ${{{ secrets.IOS_PROFILE_NAME }}} with an extra opening brace, which may cause template expansion to fail silently or use a literal string.

Apply this diff to fix the interpolation syntax:

             PROVISIONING_PROFILE_SPECIFIER="${{ secrets.IOS_PROFILE_NAME }}"
+            # Corrected from: PROVISIONING_PROFILE_SPECIFIER="${{{ secrets.IOS_PROFILE_NAME }}}"

Verify that the original intent was ${{ secrets.IOS_PROFILE_NAME }} (two braces, not three).

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.


48-48: The review comment mischaracterizes the version extraction behavior.

The review claims VERSION "will silently default to 0.0.0," but examining line 49 shows the fallback is explicit and intentional: echo "version=${VERSION:-0.0.0}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT. This uses standard bash parameter expansion syntax, not a silent default. If VERSION extraction fails, the empty value is deliberately replaced with "0.0.0" on the next line—this is visible and intentional, not masking real issues.

Additionally, the suggested fix would actually remove this explicit fallback and cause hard errors instead, which changes the workflow's error-handling behavior. While the version extraction parsing could be made more robust (e.g., using more specific regex patterns), the current approach is a valid common pattern used in shell workflows.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.


67-75: <!-- [scratchpad_start]
[task verify_review_comment]

[observations]

  • Review concern: Valid. GitHub Actions treats undefined secrets as empty strings (documented behavior), which can cause opaque failures downstream.
  • Proposed validation approach: Technically flawed.
    • Reviewer proposes bash indirect expansion ${!secret} to validate secrets exist
    • Web search confirms: indirect variable expansion only works on env vars already set at shell runtime
    • Secrets are evaluated at workflow-parse time via ${{ secrets.NAME }} expressions, not runtime
    • Bash cannot dynamically resolve GitHub secrets by computed names at runtime unless they're first mapped to env vars

[analysis]

  • The concern is legitimate: missing secrets cause failures when tools try to use empty/undefined values
  • The proposed solution has a critical flaw: it won't work as written because:
    1. Secrets must first be set as env vars: SIGNING_KEY: ${{ secrets.SIGNING_KEY }}
    2. Then the shell can check those env vars: [ -z "$SIGNING_KEY" ]
    3. The proposed loop using ${!secret} won't work because bash variables like "secret=SIGNING_KEY" don't resolve to GitHub secrets
  • Correct pattern (from best practices):
    • Set env from secrets at job/step level
    • Use conditional checks or early-exit steps to validate env vars exist

[done]

  • Review comment is INCORRECT in its proposed solution approach, though the underlying concern is valid
  • Must rewrite to provide correct validation pattern that actually works with GitHub Actions
    </scratchpad_end] -->

Correct the secrets validation approach; the proposed bash indirect expansion won't work with GitHub Actions.

The concern about missing secrets is valid—GitHub Actions treats undefined secrets as empty strings, causing opaque failures when tools consume them. However, the proposed validation using bash indirect expansion ${!secret} is technically flawed.

Secrets in GitHub Actions expressions are evaluated at workflow parse time, not runtime, so bash cannot dynamically resolve secret names at shell runtime. To validate secrets, set them as environment variables first (e.g., MY_SECRET: ${{ secrets.MY_SECRET }}) then check the env vars in the shell.

Use this corrected pattern for each job:

   release:
     name: 🚀 Semantic Release & Android Build
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+
+    env:
+      SIGNING_KEY: ${{ secrets.SIGNING_KEY }}
+      ALIAS: ${{ secrets.ALIAS }}
+      KEY_STORE_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.KEY_STORE_PASSWORD }}
+      KEY_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.KEY_PASSWORD }}

     steps:
+      - name: Validate secrets
+        run: |
+          for secret in SIGNING_KEY ALIAS KEY_STORE_PASSWORD KEY_PASSWORD; do
+            if [ -z "${!secret}" ]; then
+              echo "Error: Missing secret $secret" >&2
+              exit 1
+            fi
+          done
       
       # ... rest of steps

Repeat for iOS job with its required secrets. This ensures secrets are available as env vars before the validation step runs and the check will work correctly.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

Comment on lines +3 to +6
on:
push:
branches:
- main
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial

Workflow only triggers on main branch push.

The workflow is set to run only on push to main. This means releases will be published immediately on every commit to main, which may be unintended. Consider triggering only on tags or adding a manual dispatch option if more control is desired.

Consider using tags or manual dispatch for release workflows:

 on:
   push:
     branches:
       - main
+    tags:
+      - 'v*'
+  workflow_dispatch:

Or, restrict to main and add a tag requirement:

 on:
   push:
     branches:
       - main
     tags:
       - 'v*'
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
on:
push:
branches:
- main
on:
push:
branches:
- main
tags:
- 'v*'
workflow_dispatch:
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In build/Android-Ios-deploy.yml around lines 3 to 6, the workflow is currently
triggered on every push to main which will publish releases on each commit;
change the on: configuration to trigger only on tag creation (e.g. push with
tags: ['v*.*.*']) or add workflow_dispatch for manual runs (or both) so releases
are controlled; update the YAML to replace or augment the push:branches: - main
block with a push:tags pattern and/or include workflow_dispatch and document the
expected tag format in the workflow comments.

Comment on lines +43 to +49
- name: Get next release version
id: semantic
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
VERSION=$(npx semantic-release --dry-run | grep "The next release version is" | awk '{print $NF}')
echo "version=${VERSION:-0.0.0}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Missing job output declaration—iOS job will fail to access version.

The release job sets steps.semantic.outputs.version at line 49, but this is only a step output. The iOS job (line 148) references needs.release.outputs.version, which requires the job to explicitly declare outputs. Without this, the iOS step will receive an empty or undefined version.

Apply this diff to declare the version output from the release job:

      - name: Get next release version
        id: semantic
        env:
          GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
        run: |
          VERSION=$(npx semantic-release --dry-run | grep "The next release version is" | awk '{print $NF}')
          echo "version=${VERSION:-0.0.0}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT

+   outputs:
+     version: ${{ steps.semantic.outputs.version }}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Get next release version
id: semantic
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
VERSION=$(npx semantic-release --dry-run | grep "The next release version is" | awk '{print $NF}')
echo "version=${VERSION:-0.0.0}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
- name: Get next release version
id: semantic
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
VERSION=$(npx semantic-release --dry-run | grep "The next release version is" | awk '{print $NF}')
echo "version=${VERSION:-0.0.0}" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
outputs:
version: ${{ steps.semantic.outputs.version }}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In build/Android-Ios-deploy.yml around lines 43 to 49, the release job only sets
a step output (steps.semantic.outputs.version) but does not declare a job-level
output, so downstream jobs using needs.release.outputs.version will be empty;
declare a job output by adding an outputs block on the release job mapping
version to the step output (e.g., outputs: version: ${{
steps.semantic.outputs.version }}), ensuring the semantic step keeps the id
"semantic" and its version is exported to GITHUB_OUTPUT as before.


# 🏗️ Build APK (Release)
- name: Build APK
run: ./gradlew assembleRelease
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

No error handling for build failures; downstream steps will execute regardless.

If the APK build (line 64) or pod install (line 114) fails, subsequent steps (signing, archiving, etc.) will still run, potentially causing confusing errors or wasted resource cycles.

Consider adding explicit error checks or using GitHub Actions' native if: conditions to halt on failure:

       # 🏗️ Build APK (Release)
       - name: Build APK
         run: ./gradlew assembleRelease
+        if: success()

Similarly for the iOS CocoaPods installation:

       - name: Install CocoaPods
-        run: pod install --project-directory=ios
+        run: |
+          if [ ! -d "ios" ]; then
+            echo "Error: ios directory not found" >&2
+            exit 1
+          fi
+          pod install --project-directory=ios

Also applies to: 114-114

Comment on lines +131 to +143
xcodebuild -workspace ios/YourApp.xcworkspace \
-scheme YourApp \
-configuration Release \
-archivePath build/YourApp.xcarchive \
archive DEVELOPMENT_TEAM=${{ secrets.APPLE_TEAM_ID }} \
CODE_SIGN_STYLE=Manual \
CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY="Apple Distribution" \
PROVISIONING_PROFILE_SPECIFIER="${{ secrets.IOS_PROFILE_NAME }}"

xcodebuild -exportArchive \
-archivePath build/YourApp.xcarchive \
-exportPath dist \
-exportOptionsPlist ios/exportOptions.plist
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Replace hardcoded template placeholders with environment variables or documentation.

The xcodebuild commands reference hardcoded values (ios/YourApp.xcworkspace, YourApp, build/YourApp.xcarchive, dist, ios/exportOptions.plist). These are template placeholders that must be replaced for each project. This is error-prone and not clearly documented.

Apply this diff to parameterize key values and add documentation:

+      # 🔧 Set build configuration variables
+      - name: Set iOS build variables
+        run: |
+          echo "IOS_WORKSPACE=ios/YourApp.xcworkspace" >> $GITHUB_ENV
+          echo "IOS_SCHEME=YourApp" >> $GITHUB_ENV
+          echo "IOS_ARCHIVE_PATH=build/YourApp.xcarchive" >> $GITHUB_ENV
+          echo "EXPORT_OPTIONS_PLIST=ios/exportOptions.plist" >> $GITHUB_ENV
+
       # 🏗️ Build iOS app (Release)
       - name: Build iOS app
         run: |
-          xcodebuild -workspace ios/YourApp.xcworkspace \
-            -scheme YourApp \
+          xcodebuild -workspace ${{ env.IOS_WORKSPACE }} \
+            -scheme ${{ env.IOS_SCHEME }} \
             -configuration Release \
-            -archivePath build/YourApp.xcarchive \
+            -archivePath ${{ env.IOS_ARCHIVE_PATH }} \
             archive DEVELOPMENT_TEAM=${{ secrets.APPLE_TEAM_ID }} \
             CODE_SIGN_STYLE=Manual \
             CODE_SIGN_IDENTITY="Apple Distribution" \
             PROVISIONING_PROFILE_SPECIFIER="${{ secrets.IOS_PROFILE_NAME }}"
 
           xcodebuild -exportArchive \
-            -archivePath build/YourApp.xcarchive \
+            -archivePath ${{ env.IOS_ARCHIVE_PATH }} \
             -exportPath dist \
-            -exportOptionsPlist ios/exportOptions.plist
+            -exportOptionsPlist ${{ env.EXPORT_OPTIONS_PLIST }}

Additionally, add a comment block at the top of the iOS job documenting required configuration values (workspace name, scheme, etc.).

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In build/Android-Ios-deploy.yml around lines 131 to 143, the xcodebuild calls
use hardcoded template placeholders (workspace, scheme, archive path, export
path, exportOptions.plist); replace those literals with CI variables (e.g. ${{
env.IOS_WORKSPACE }}, ${{ env.IOS_SCHEME }}, ${{ env.IOS_ARCHIVE_PATH }}, ${{
env.IOS_EXPORT_PATH }}, ${{ env.IOS_EXPORT_OPTIONS_PLIST }} or secrets where
appropriate) and reference them in the xcodebuild commands so the workflow is
reusable; add a comment block at the top of the iOS job listing required
configuration keys and example values (workspace name, scheme, archive path,
export path, exportOptions plist, DEVELOPMENT_TEAM and provisioning profile
secret names) and ensure the workflow supplies sensible defaults or fails with a
clear error if required env vars/secrets are missing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants