Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I am reviewer at CHES and I have observed that presumably due to a lack of instruction authors are using very different formatting in regard to section capitalization and float placement.
Here is a suggestion on how formatting may be done (as specified in iacrdoc):
I also added explicit examples for figures and tables including their captions to iacrdoc.
This would provide more clarity on how these aspects should be formatted to achieve a 'unified look' in IACR publications. The hope is that in the future paper submission will follow a more unified formatting in these regards right away without the need for suggestions or corrections by reviewers and editors.