[OTAGENT-987] Add datadog-agent ddot install command#49408
[OTAGENT-987] Add datadog-agent ddot install command#49408liustanley wants to merge 19 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Go Package Import DifferencesBaseline: f92774a
|
Files inventory check summaryFile checks results against ancestor f92774a0: Results for datadog-agent_7.79.0~devel.git.836.0f906d0.pipeline.108099830-1_amd64.deb:No change detected |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: 68ba423 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | +3.75 | [+0.71, +6.79] | 1 | Logs |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | +3.75 | [+0.71, +6.79] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +1.52 | [+1.35, +1.68] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | +1.10 | [+1.03, +1.17] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | +1.09 | [+0.99, +1.19] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | +0.34 | [+0.28, +0.40] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | docker_containers_memory | memory utilization | +0.32 | [+0.24, +0.41] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter | memory utilization | +0.24 | [+0.02, +0.47] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.21 | [+0.16, +0.27] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_delta | memory utilization | +0.14 | [-0.04, +0.31] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.37, +0.44] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 | ingress throughput | +0.02 | [-0.19, +0.23] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | +0.00 | [-0.19, +0.19] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.20, +0.20] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.12, +0.11] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.45, +0.41] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.13, +0.09] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.02 | [-0.57, +0.53] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative | memory utilization | -0.03 | [-0.18, +0.12] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.11 | [-0.17, -0.06] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.12 | [-0.16, -0.08] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | -0.23 | [-0.38, -0.08] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory utilization | -1.14 | [-1.38, -0.90] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -2.95 | [-4.58, -1.33] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | observed_value | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | docker_containers_cpu | simple_check_run | 10/10 | 684 ≥ 26 | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | memory_usage | 10/10 | 282.43MiB ≤ 370MiB | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | simple_check_run | 10/10 | 701 ≥ 26 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | 0.19GiB ≤ 1.20GiB | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | 0.24GiB ≤ 1.20GiB | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | 0.20GiB ≤ 1.20GiB | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | 0.22GiB ≤ 1.20GiB | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | |
| ❌ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 0/10 | 4 > 3 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | 175.75MiB ≤ 181MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ❌ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 2/10 | 4 > 3 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | 501.15MiB ≤ 550MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | 4 ≤ 6 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | 204.13MiB ≤ 220MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | cpu_usage | 10/10 | 364.76 ≤ 2000 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | 4 ≤ 6 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | 446.35MiB ≤ 475MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
❌ Failed. Some Quality Gates were violated.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 0/10 replicas passed. Failed 10 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 2/10 replicas passed. Failed 8 which is > 0. Gate FAILED.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: c3d69f3910
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
dustmop
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, with a few nits / questions.
| Use: "extension [command]", | ||
| Short: "Manage agent package extensions", | ||
| } | ||
| extensionCmd.AddCommand(installCommand(), removeCommand()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not familiar with this feature, so this might not be a useful question, but does it make sense to also have a command like datadog-agent extension list to see what is already installed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that could definitely be helpful, but could be added in a follow up PR. @Stanislas167 what do you think?
…agent into stanley.liu/OTAGENT-987
truthbk
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good! Please make sure you validate the environment variable propagation works as expected.
| Use: "extension [command]", | ||
| Short: "Manage agent package extensions", | ||
| } | ||
| extensionCmd.AddCommand(installCommand(), removeCommand()) |
| if err != nil { | ||
| return err | ||
| } | ||
| return i.InstallExtensions(context.Background(), url, args) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not sure if the child's process will automagically inherit the environment variables from the caller process. Please make sure you test this, and if it's not the case, make sure they're propagated.
|
Updated command name from |
Gitlab CI Configuration ChangesModified Jobsnew-e2e-windows-ddot-package-a7-x86_64 new-e2e-windows-ddot-package-a7-x86_64:
after_script:
- CODECOV_TOKEN=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $CODECOV token) || exit
$?; export CODECOV_TOKEN
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/junit_upload.sh "junit-${CI_JOB_ID}.tgz" "$E2E_RESULT_JSON"
- "if [ -d \"$E2E_COVERAGE_OUT_DIR\" ]; then\n dda inv -- -e coverage.process-e2e-coverage-folders\
\ $E2E_COVERAGE_OUT_DIR\n dda inv -- -e dyntest.compute-and-upload-job-index\
\ --bucket-uri $S3_PERMANENT_ARTIFACTS_URI --coverage-folder $E2E_COVERAGE_OUT_DIR\
\ --commit-sha $CI_COMMIT_SHA --job-id $CI_JOB_ID\nfi\n"
artifacts:
expire_in: 2 weeks
paths:
- $E2E_OUTPUT_DIR
- $E2E_RESULT_JSON
- junit-*.tgz
- $E2E_COVERAGE_OUT_DIR
reports:
annotations:
- $EXTERNAL_LINKS_PATH
when: always
before_script:
- CURRENT_AGENT_ASSERT_VERSION=$(dda inv agent.version) || exit $?; export CURRENT_AGENT_ASSERT_VERSION
- CURRENT_AGENT_ASSERT_PACKAGE_VERSION=$(dda inv agent.version --url-safe)-1 ||
exit $?; export CURRENT_AGENT_ASSERT_PACKAGE_VERSION
- mkdir -p $GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache && zstd -dc modcache_e2e.tar.zst | tar xf - -C
$GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache
- rm -f modcache_e2e.tar.zst
- mkdir -p ~/.pulumi && zstd -dc pulumi_plugins.tar.zst | tar xf - -C ~/.pulumi
- rm -f pulumi_plugins.tar.zst
- mkdir -p $GOPATH/bin $GOPATH/pkg/mod/cache && zstd -dc modcache_tools.tar.zst
| tar xf - -C $GOPATH
- rm -f modcache_tools.tar.zst
- export PATH=$PATH:$GOPATH/bin
- mkdir -p ~/.aws
- "if [ -n \"$E2E_USE_AWS_PROFILE\" ]; then\n echo Using agent-qa-ci aws profile\n\
\ $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_QA_E2E profile >> ~/.aws/config\
\ || exit $?\n # Now all `aws` commands target the agent-qa profile\n export\
\ AWS_PROFILE=agent-qa-ci\nelse\n # Assume role to fetch only once credentials\
\ and avoid rate limits\n echo Assuming ddbuild-agent-ci role\n roleoutput=\"\
$(aws sts assume-role --role-arn arn:aws:iam::669783387624:role/ddbuild-agent-ci\
\ --external-id ddbuild-agent-ci --role-session-name RoleSession)\"\n export\
\ AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=\"$(echo \"$roleoutput\" | jq -r '.Credentials.AccessKeyId')\"\
\n export AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=\"$(echo \"$roleoutput\" | jq -r '.Credentials.SecretAccessKey')\"\
\n export AWS_SESSION_TOKEN=\"$(echo \"$roleoutput\" | jq -r '.Credentials.SessionToken')\"\
\nfi\n"
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_public_key_rsa > $E2E_AWS_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH
|| exit $?
- touch $E2E_AWS_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH && chmod 600 $E2E_AWS_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH && $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh
$AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_key_rsa > $E2E_AWS_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH || exit $?
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_public_key_rsa > $E2E_AZURE_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH
|| exit $?
- touch $E2E_AZURE_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH && chmod 600 $E2E_AZURE_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH &&
$CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_key_rsa > $E2E_AZURE_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH
|| exit $?
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_public_key_rsa > $E2E_GCP_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH
|| exit $?
- touch $E2E_GCP_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH && chmod 600 $E2E_GCP_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH && $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh
$AGENT_QA_E2E ssh_key_rsa > $E2E_GCP_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH || exit $?
- pulumi login "s3://dd-pulumi-state?region=us-east-1&awssdk=v2&profile=$AWS_PROFILE"
- ARM_CLIENT_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_AZURE client_id)
|| exit $?; export ARM_CLIENT_ID
- ARM_CLIENT_SECRET=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_AZURE token)
|| exit $?; export ARM_CLIENT_SECRET
- ARM_TENANT_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_AZURE tenant_id)
|| exit $?; export ARM_TENANT_ID
- ARM_SUBSCRIPTION_ID=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_AZURE subscription_id)
|| exit $?; export ARM_SUBSCRIPTION_ID
- $CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_GCP credentials_json > ~/gcp-credentials.json
|| exit $?
- export GOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS=~/gcp-credentials.json
- 'gcp_acr_key=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $E2E_GCP credentials_acr_readonly)
|| exit $?
export E2E_GCP_IMAGE_PULL_PASSWORD="b64=$(printf ''%s'' "$gcp_acr_key" | base64
-w 0)"
'
- dda inv -- -e gitlab.generate-ci-visibility-links --output=$EXTERNAL_LINKS_PATH
- export DD_ENV=nativetest
- export DD_CIVISIBILITY_ENABLED=true
- export DD_CIVISIBILITY_AGENTLESS_ENABLED=true
- export DD_CIVISIBILITY_FLAKY_RETRY_ENABLED=false
- export DD_TAGS="gitlab.pipeline_source:${CI_PIPELINE_SOURCE}"
- DD_API_KEY=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $AGENT_API_KEY_ORG2 token)
|| exit $?; export DD_API_KEY
- export WINDOWS_DDNPM_DRIVER=${WINDOWS_DDNPM_DRIVER:-$(dda inv release.get-release-json-value
"dependencies::WINDOWS_DDNPM_DRIVER" --no-worktree)}
- export WINDOWS_DDPROCMON_DRIVER=${WINDOWS_DDPROCMON_DRIVER:-$(dda inv release.get-release-json-value
"dependencies::WINDOWS_DDPROCMON_DRIVER" --no-worktree)}
image: registry.ddbuild.io/ci/datadog-agent-buildimages/linux$CI_IMAGE_LINUX_SUFFIX:$CI_IMAGE_LINUX
needs:
- go_e2e_deps
- go_e2e_test_binaries
- go_tools_deps
- job: new-e2e-base-coverage
optional: true
- deploy_windows_testing-a7
- deploy_installer_oci
- deploy_agent_oci
- qa_installer_script_windows
parallel:
matrix:
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestDDOTExtensionViaMSI$/TestInstallAndUninstallDDOTExtension$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestDDOTExtensionViaMSI$/TestUpgradeEnablesDDOTExtension$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestDDOTExtensionMSIUpgrade$/TestUpgradePreservesDDOTExtension$"
- EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestDDOTExtensionViaInstallScript$/TestInstallAndPurgeDDOTExtension$"
+ - EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestDDOTExtensionViaSubcommand$/TestInstallDDOTSubcommand$"
rules:
- if: $DEPLOY_AGENT == "true" || $DDR_WORKFLOW_ID != null
- if: $RUN_E2E_TESTS == "off"
when: never
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
when: never
- if: $RUN_E2E_TESTS == "on"
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH == "main"
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.x$/
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_TAG =~ /^[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+-rc\.[0-9]+$/
when: on_success
- changes:
compare_to: $COMPARE_TO_BRANCH
paths:
- .gitlab/test/e2e/e2e.yml
- test/e2e-framework/**/*
- test/new-e2e/go.mod
- flakes.yaml
- release.json
- changes:
compare_to: $COMPARE_TO_BRANCH
paths:
- tools/windows/DatadogAgentInstaller/**/*
- .gitlab/windows/test/e2e_install_packages/windows.yml
- test/new-e2e/tests/windows/install-test/**/*
- test/new-e2e/tests/windows/domain-test/**/*
- tasks/msi.py
- omnibus/python-scripts/**/*
- omnibus/lib/**/*
- omnibus/config/projects/agent.rb
- omnibus/config/software/**/*
- omnibus/config/templates/**/*
- release.json
when: on_success
- if: $CI_COMMIT_BRANCH =~ /^mq-working-branch-/
when: never
- allow_failure: true
when: manual
script:
- export IS_DEV_BRANCH="$(dda inv -- -e pipeline.is-dev-branch)"
- DYNAMIC_TESTS_BREAKGLASS=$($CI_PROJECT_DIR/tools/ci/fetch_secret.sh $DYNAMIC_TESTS_BREAKGLASS
value) || exit $?; export DYNAMIC_TESTS_BREAKGLASS
- "if [ \"$DYNAMIC_TESTS_BREAKGLASS\" == \"true\" ] || [ \"$IS_DEV_BRANCH\" == \"\
false\" ] || [ \"$RUN_E2E_TESTS\" == \"on\" ]; then\n export DYNAMIC_TESTS_FLAG=\"\
\"\nfi\n"
- export E2E_IMAGE_PULL_PASSWORD=$(aws ecr get-login-password),$E2E_GCP_IMAGE_PULL_PASSWORD
- dda inv -- -e new-e2e-tests.run $DYNAMIC_TESTS_FLAG $PRE_BUILT_BINARIES_FLAG $MAX_RETRIES_FLAG
--local-package $CI_PROJECT_DIR/$OMNIBUS_BASE_DIR --result-json $E2E_RESULT_JSON
--targets $TARGETS --junit-tar junit-${CI_JOB_ID}.tgz ${EXTRA_PARAMS} --test-washer
--logs-folder=$E2E_OUTPUT_DIR/logs --logs-post-processing --logs-post-processing-test-depth=$E2E_LOGS_PROCESSING_TEST_DEPTH
stage: e2e_install_packages
tags:
- arch:amd64
- specific:true
timeout: 45m
variables:
AGENT_MAJOR_VERSION: 7
DYNAMIC_TESTS_FLAG: --impacted
E2E_AWS_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-aws-ssh-key
E2E_AWS_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-aws-ssh-key.pub
E2E_AZURE_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-azure-ssh-key
E2E_AZURE_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-azure-ssh-key.pub
E2E_COMMIT_SHA: $CI_COMMIT_SHORT_SHA
E2E_COVERAGE_OUT_DIR: $CI_PROJECT_DIR/coverage
E2E_GCP_PRIVATE_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-gcp-ssh-key
E2E_GCP_PUBLIC_KEY_PATH: /tmp/agent-qa-gcp-ssh-key.pub
E2E_IMAGE_PULL_REGISTRY: 669783387624.dkr.ecr.us-east-1.amazonaws.com,us-central1-docker.pkg.dev
E2E_IMAGE_PULL_USERNAME: AWS,_json_key
E2E_KEY_PAIR_NAME: datadog-agent-ci-rsa
E2E_LOGS_PROCESSING_TEST_DEPTH: 1
E2E_OUTPUT_DIR: $CI_PROJECT_DIR/e2e-output
E2E_PIPELINE_ID: $CI_PIPELINE_ID
E2E_RESULT_JSON: $CI_PROJECT_DIR/e2e_test_output.json
E2E_SKIP_WINDOWS: $SKIP_WINDOWS
E2E_USE_AWS_PROFILE: 'true'
EXTERNAL_LINKS_PATH: external_links_$CI_JOB_ID.json
EXTRA_PARAMS: --run "TestDDOTInstalls|TestAgentMSIInstallsDDOTPackage"
FLAKY_PATTERNS_CONFIG: $CI_PROJECT_DIR/flaky-patterns-runtime.yaml
GIT_STRATEGY: clone
KUBERNETES_CPU_REQUEST: 6
KUBERNETES_MEMORY_LIMIT: 16Gi
KUBERNETES_MEMORY_REQUEST: 12Gi
MAX_RETRIES_FLAG: ''
PRE_BUILT_BINARIES_FLAG: --use-prebuilt-binaries
REMOTE_STACK_CLEANING: 'true'
SHOULD_RUN_IN_FLAKES_FINDER: 'true'
TARGETS: ./tests/installer/windows
TEAM: windows-productsChanges Summary
ℹ️ Diff available in the job log. |
What does this PR do?
Adds a datadog-agent ddot subcommand group with install and remove commands for managing DDOT installation from an OCI package.
The command shells out to the installer binary co-located with the agent (
<root>/embedded/bin/installer) via the existing InstallerExec layerURL resolution precedence:
--url: use the provided full OCI URL--registry: constructoci://<registry>/agent-package:<current-version>--urland--registryare mutually exclusive. Auth is controlled via DD_INSTALLER_REGISTRY_AUTH, which propagates to the installer subprocess.Motivation
Customers who already have the agent installed (without DDOT) should install DDOT with a
datadog-agentcommand instead of having to run the install script to reinstall the agent + DDOT.Describe how you validated your changes
Unit tests and e2e tests, will validate on rc as well
Additional Notes