-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
RUM-12891: Fix RUM resource duration breakdown #3010
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ambushwork
wants to merge
1
commit into
develop
Choose a base branch
from
yl/fix-duration-break-down
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see how this fixes the issue given that under the hood it will first try to pull existing UUID from the
Request.tag, which should already be there if call to interceptor was made before.Can you please give more details?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that's because the UUID we generate from
DatadogIntercptoris not put insideRequest.tag, so here if we try to retrievetag(UUID::class.java)it will always return null. The UUID is only used as a RUM resource key.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is probably a real cause of the issue, it should be there and it is a miss from our side.
Basically we always should rely on the UUID, because the legacy way to identify the request is not reliable: say there are multiple
GETcalls in parallel with the same URL - they will be identified as the same call. Same for multiplePOSTcalls with the same body length.So when we generate UUID we should put it to the request as tag as well.
And we should add the tests to the
reliability/single-fit-okhttpthat for a call made with instrumentation setupstartResource/stopResource/waitForResourceTiming/addResourceTimingall have the samekeyargument.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, I see the issue, then this is a bit tricky to handle with our current implementation, because
createinDatadogEventListenerwill be called first, thecallis immutable inside, meaning that we are not able to pass our resource id along with the request toDatadogInterceptorThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At the same time we have an access to the
Callobject in all the callbacks ofEventListener, meaning we can read the actual state ofrequestto get the ID in each callback instead of passing it at theDatadogEventListenerconstructor, probably it will still get consistent results for the same call.I'm not sure at which point
callStartis called, but if it is afterintercept, then we should be good.Overall, we shouldn't indeed mutate anything here as per the following comment.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
callStartalso happens beforeintercept, and other functions are not systematically called afterinterceptneither, we will need to dig another way out.