Skip to content

Conversation

@edenhaus
Copy link
Member

@edenhaus edenhaus commented Jul 4, 2024

Fix N10 Plus capabilities correctly this time
Follow-up of #434

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Enhancements
    • Updated device capabilities description to "Deebot N10 PLUS" for improved accuracy and clarity.

@edenhaus edenhaus added the pr: bugfix PR, which fixes a bug label Jul 4, 2024
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes update the capabilities description from "Deebot T10 PLUS" to "Deebot N10 PLUS" and modify the arguments passed to cached_info and rooms within the map section by using the correct events. This ensures accurate capability identification and proper interaction with the map's cache and room data.

Changes

File Change Summary
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/umwv6z.py Updated model name and modified cached_info and rooms arguments.

Poem

A tweak in code, a subtle shift,
From T to N, our bot did drift.
Cached maps align with rooms anew,
For N10 PLUS, the world to view.
🎉 Hooray for change, the future bright,
In algorithms, we find small light. 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.32%. Comparing base (e2dae81) to head (fc45393).
Report is 3 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #532   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.32%   86.32%           
=======================================
  Files          87       87           
  Lines        3269     3269           
  Branches      530      530           
=======================================
  Hits         2822     2822           
  Misses        395      395           
  Partials       52       52           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@edenhaus
Copy link
Member Author

edenhaus commented Jul 4, 2024

pre-commit.ci autofix

@edenhaus edenhaus enabled auto-merge (squash) July 4, 2024 07:31
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e2dae81 and fc45393.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/umwv6z.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/umwv6z.py

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr: bugfix PR, which fixes a bug

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants