Skip to content

Conversation

@josh-sanders
Copy link
Contributor

@josh-sanders josh-sanders commented Dec 11, 2024

Base on the Deebot OZMO T8 AIVI, class 'x5d34r'

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a comprehensive configuration for a robotic vacuum device, enhancing its operational capabilities including battery management, cleaning operations, and error handling.
    • Added support for advanced features like carpet auto fan boost and true detection.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Expanded test coverage for device models, ensuring all models, including the new identifier, are correctly loaded and tested for capabilities.
  • Tests

    • Updated tests to include a more comprehensive set of expected events and commands for various device classes, improving the robustness of the testing framework.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce a new file, x5d34r.py, which implements a comprehensive configuration for a robotic vacuum device within the deebot_client framework. This file defines various capabilities, including battery management, cleaning operations, and mapping functionalities, organized into specific classes. Additionally, the test file test_init.py is updated to include a new device identifier and enhance the testing of capabilities for multiple device classes, ensuring a robust testing framework for the new functionalities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/x5d34r.py New file added defining capabilities for a robotic vacuum, including battery management, cleaning, and mapping functionalities.
tests/hardware/test_init.py Updated to include new device identifier "z0gd1j" and enhanced event extraction for multiple device classes.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

pr: new-feature

Suggested reviewers

  • edenhaus

🐇 "In the realm of dust and cheer,
A new robot friend draws near.
With features bright and mapping clear,
It cleans our homes, oh so dear!
So let us hop and dance with glee,
For x5d34r brings joy, you see!" 🧹✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/hardware/test_init.py (2)

Line range hint 103-153: Include 'z0gd1j' in capability event extraction tests

The device 'z0gd1j' is added to the DEVICES dictionary but is not included in the parameterized tests in test_capabilities_event_extraction. To ensure that 'z0gd1j' capabilities are correctly validated, add it to the list of device classes being tested.

Apply this diff to include 'z0gd1j' in the tests:

 @pytest.mark.parametrize(
     ("class_", "expected"),
     [
         # Existing device tests...
         (
             "p95mgv",
             {
                 # Existing expected events and commands
             },
         ),
+        (
+            "z0gd1j",
+            {
+                # Expected events and commands for 'z0gd1j'
+                # Add the appropriate expected events and commands here
+            },
+        ),
     ],
-    ids=["5xu9h3", "itk04l", "yna5xi", "p95mgv"],
+    ids=["5xu9h3", "itk04l", "yna5xi", "p95mgv", "z0gd1j"],
 )
 async def test_capabilities_event_extraction(
     class_: str, expected: dict[type[Event], list[Command]]
 ) -> None:
     info = await get_static_device_info(class_)
     assert info is not None
     capabilities = info.capabilities
     assert capabilities._events.keys() == expected.keys()
     for event, expected_commands in expected.items():
         assert (
             capabilities.get_refresh_commands(event) == expected_commands
         ), f"Refresh commands don't match for {event}"

303-303: Ensure device list is sorted if required

The device list now includes "z0gd1j" at the end. If the order of devices matters (e.g., for readability or consistency), consider sorting the list alphabetically.

Apply this diff to sort the device list:

 assert list(DEVICES) == [
     # Existing devices...
     "x5d34r",
     "yna5xi",
+    "z0gd1j",
     "z4lvk7",
     "zjavof",
     "zwkcqc",
-    "z0gd1j",
 ]
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c6076c and 1137f3d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/z0gd1j.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/hardware/test_init.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/z0gd1j.py (2)

1-1: Verify that short_name(__name__) returns the correct device identifier

In DEVICES[short_name(__name__)] = StaticDeviceInfo(...), ensure that short_name(__name__) correctly returns 'z0gd1j' as intended. Since __name__ includes the module path, short_name must extract the correct device identifier to properly register the device.

Run the following script to confirm the value returned by short_name(__name__):

✅ Verification successful

short_name function implementation is correct and consistently used

The short_name function in deebot_client/util/__init__.py is correctly implemented to extract the last part of a dotted path:

def short_name(value: str) -> str:
    """Return value after last dot."""
    return value.rsplit(".", maxsplit=1)[-1]

This implementation will correctly return 'z0gd1j' from 'deebot_client.hardware.deebot.z0gd1j'. The pattern is consistently used across multiple device modules (e.g., '5xu9h3', 'umwv6z', 'yna5xi', etc.) for registering device capabilities in the DEVICES dictionary.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that short_name(__name__) returns 'z0gd1j'

# Test: Extract the device identifier using short_name and print it
python -c "from deebot_client.util import short_name; print(short_name('deebot_client.hardware.deebot.z0gd1j'))"

Length of output: 217


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first locate the short_name function definition
ast-grep --pattern 'def short_name($_) { $$$ }'

# Also search for any usage of short_name function
rg "short_name" -A 2

# Find the device registration code
rg "DEVICES\[.*\].*=.*StaticDeviceInfo" -A 2

Length of output: 8847


Line range hint 75-83: Confirm the validity of WaterAmount.ULTRAHIGH

In the water capability, the types include WaterAmount.ULTRAHIGH. Verify that ULTRAHIGH is a valid member of the WaterAmount enum. If it doesn't exist, this will cause an AttributeError at runtime.

Run the following script to list all members of the WaterAmount enum:

✅ Verification successful

WaterAmount.ULTRAHIGH is a valid enum member

WaterAmount.ULTRAHIGH is correctly defined in the WaterAmount enum with a value of 4, and it's being used consistently across multiple device-specific implementations. The code is safe from potential AttributeError at runtime.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: List the members of the WaterAmount enum to verify 'ULTRAHIGH' exists

# Test: Display the members of the WaterAmount enum
grep -A 5 'class WaterAmount(Enum):' $(fd WaterInfoEvent.py)

Length of output: 62


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find where WaterAmount enum is defined
rg -l "class WaterAmount"

# Then search for any references to WaterAmount.ULTRAHIGH
rg "WaterAmount\.ULTRAHIGH"

# Also search for enum definition with different patterns
rg "WaterAmount.*Enum"

Length of output: 1244


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual enum definition to see its members
rg -A 10 "class WaterAmount\(IntEnum\):" deebot_client/events/water_info.py

Length of output: 253

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
x5d34r.py No newline at end of file
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Inconsistency between filename and device identifier

The filename is z0gd1j.py, but line 1 references x5d34r.py. Ensure that the device identifier within the code matches the filename and the intended device (z0gd1j). This inconsistency might lead to confusion or incorrect device configurations.

@edenhaus edenhaus added the pr: new-feature PR, which adds a new feature label Dec 11, 2024
@edenhaus edenhaus changed the title Add DEEBOT Neo , 'class': 'z0gd1j' Add DEEBOT Neo (z0gd1j) Dec 11, 2024
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.01%. Comparing base (635d21f) to head (03cc4d2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #667   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.01%   86.01%           
=======================================
  Files          93       93           
  Lines        3454     3454           
  Branches      307      307           
=======================================
  Hits         2971     2971           
  Misses        429      429           
  Partials       54       54           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@edenhaus edenhaus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @josh-sanders 👍

@edenhaus edenhaus merged commit e9fd1a3 into DeebotUniverse:dev Dec 11, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr: new-feature PR, which adds a new feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants