-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Feature/parity with python wrapper #14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: feature/v3
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…r with a feature deprecated message on using remove
…th a feature deprecated message on using remove
…with a feature deprecated message on using remove
…th a feature deprecated message on using remove
…with a feature deprecated message on using remove
…th a feature deprecated message on using remove
…$`, add depreciation warning when using argument without `$`
…y.js` - orderBy, between, getIntersecting, and getNearest still not passing
|
Updated to close #10. |
|
Also closes #17. |
…ge-Inc/javascript-montage into feature/parity-with-python-wrapper
feat(task): add task endpoint to wrapper
feat(project): add project API endpoint
src/api/project.js
Outdated
| return this.client.request(`project`); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| update(name, subdomain) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Karvel: Please sprinkle in a bit of destructuring here.
…ons read more naturally
tests/field_test.js
Outdated
| describe('#istarts()', () => { | ||
| it('should equal a filter with a value of $istarts', () => { | ||
| let expectedFilter = [['$eq', 'y']]; | ||
| expect(field.eq('y').filters).to.eql(expectedFilter); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This tests eq() instead of istarts()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addressed in a4c65e4.
|
@dmpayton @Karvel Should @Karvel are the @dmpayton do you want to wait on implementing tests for the API classes (document, file, etc)? I'd recommend implementing a unit test for |
|
@nick-herrera I erroneously thought that 66dae52 addressed #17. I took care of it in a062c1f. |
|
I'm cool with merging this once the 4 TODOs in the original comment are complete. |
TODO