Skip to content

yap: 7.6.0-unstable-2025-05-23 -> 8.0.1-unstable-2025-10-27 #444349

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 28, 2025
Merged

yap: 7.6.0-unstable-2025-05-23 -> 8.0.1-unstable-2025-10-27 #444349

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 28, 2025

Conversation

@qzylinra
Copy link
Contributor

@qzylinra qzylinra commented Sep 19, 2025 •
edited
Loading

close #444237

Things done

  • Built on platform:
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Ran nixpkgs-review on this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files, usually in ./result/bin/.
  • Nixpkgs Release Notes
    • Package update: when the change is major or breaking.
  • NixOS Release Notes
    • Module addition: when adding a new NixOS module.
    • Module update: when the change is significant.
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other READMEs.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux. 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. labels Sep 19, 2025
@qzylinra qzylinra mentioned this pull request Sep 20, 2025
Closed
@mdaniels5757

This comment was marked as outdated.

Sign in to view
mdaniels5757
mdaniels5757 approved these changes Sep 22, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@mdaniels5757 mdaniels5757 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved automatically following the successful run of nixpkgs-review.

@nixpkgs-ci nixpkgs-ci bot added 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person. and removed 9.needs: reviewer This PR currently has no reviewers requested and needs attention. labels Sep 22, 2025
@qzylinra qzylinra changed the title yap: 7.6.0-unstable-2025-05-23 -> 8.0.1-unstable-2025-09-16 yap: 7.6.0-unstable-2025-05-23 -> 8.0.1-unstable-2025-09-24 Oct 16, 2025
@mdaniels5757
Copy link
Contributor

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review-gha

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 444349 --build-args='-L'
Commit: 56abe75e2352c70f4ae6499d7b4cd0ac8e60474f (subsequent changes)
Merge: 473aaf1f720b7c4afa28f26ad89380c9198b37ba

Logs: https://github.com/mdaniels5757/nixpkgs-review-gha/actions/runs/18575596554

x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:
  • yap

@qzylinra qzylinra changed the title yap: 7.6.0-unstable-2025-05-23 -> 8.0.1-unstable-2025-09-24 yap: 7.6.0-unstable-2025-05-23 -> 8.0.1-unstable-2025-10-27 Oct 28, 2025
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 28, 2025
Merged via the queue into NixOS:master with commit 3de8a7b Oct 28, 2025
29 of 31 checks passed
@qzylinra qzylinra deleted the yap branch October 28, 2025 12:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@mdaniels5757 mdaniels5757 mdaniels5757 approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin. 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 This PR causes between 1 and 10 packages to rebuild on Linux. 10.rebuild-linux: 1 This PR causes 1 package to rebuild on Linux. 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one person.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@qzylinra @mdaniels5757 @SuperSandro2000