Skip to content

Conversation

@antico5
Copy link
Contributor

@antico5 antico5 commented Oct 27, 2025

This PR introduces a workflow that checks for the presence of the "peer dependencies reviewed" label on the release PR. Since that PR is created by a workflow itself, it can't trigger other ones. For this, a step was added after the changesets/action to mark the PR as draft. Then, when an user manually marks it for ready for review, the label check workflow is ran.

The goal of this workflow is to ensure the person doing the release manually checks for peer dependency version range bumps.

@antico5 antico5 requested a review from kanej October 27, 2025 13:51
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 27, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 616f234

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@kanej kanej added no changeset needed This PR doesn't require a changeset no docs needed This PR doesn't require links to documentation and removed status:triaging labels Oct 28, 2025

jobs:
check-label:
if: github.head_ref == 'changeset-release/main'
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the difference between this check and stating the branch in the on section?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

no changeset needed This PR doesn't require a changeset no docs needed This PR doesn't require links to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants