Skip to content

Add 3 blockchain reasoning task categories (Smart contracts, Consensus mechanisms and Tokenomics)#29

Open
Ridwannurudeen wants to merge 1 commit intoNousResearch:mainfrom
Ridwannurudeen:tasks/blockchain-reasoning-categories
Open

Add 3 blockchain reasoning task categories (Smart contracts, Consensus mechanisms and Tokenomics)#29
Ridwannurudeen wants to merge 1 commit intoNousResearch:mainfrom
Ridwannurudeen:tasks/blockchain-reasoning-categories

Conversation

@Ridwannurudeen
Copy link

Summary

Adds three new reasoning task categories covering blockchain and decentralized systems — a domain not yet represented in the repository. These tasks test reasoning abilities that are increasingly important as blockchain technology intersects with AI systems.

New Task Categories

1. Smart Contract Logic Reasoning (tasks/smart-contract-logic-reasoning.md)

  • 5 examples covering tiered pricing boundary logic, transaction ordering in blocks, double-voting attack analysis, DeFi liquidation calculations, and integer overflow vulnerabilities
  • Tests: program logic tracing, state machine reasoning, edge case detection, vulnerability identification

2. Consensus Mechanism Analysis (tasks/consensus-mechanism-analysis.md)

  • 4 examples covering blockchain trilemma analysis, multi-dimensional decentralization comparison, Proof of Stake attack/defense reasoning, and AI-augmented consensus game theory
  • Tests: tradeoff analysis, Byzantine fault tolerance reasoning, game-theoretic thinking, distributed systems understanding

3. Tokenomics and Incentive Design Reasoning (tasks/tokenomics-and-incentive-design-reasoning.md)

  • 5 examples covering token launch governance dynamics, play-to-earn death spirals, liquid vs locked staking analysis, treasury buyback reasoning, and DEX fee model competition
  • Tests: economic modeling, incentive alignment analysis, supply/demand dynamics, second-order effect prediction

Why These Categories

  1. Novel domain: No existing tasks cover blockchain/Web3 reasoning despite it being a rapidly growing area where LLMs are increasingly deployed
  2. Rich reasoning: These tasks require combining multiple reasoning skills — mathematical computation, game theory, economic analysis, program logic tracing, and adversarial thinking
  3. Practical relevance: LLMs are actively used for smart contract auditing, tokenomics design, and DeFi analysis; these tasks directly evaluate those capabilities

Format

All files follow the existing repository format:

  • Description section explaining the task
  • Modality: Text only
  • Multiple detailed input/output examples with --- separators
  • Tags section with relevant keywords

Changes

  • Added 3 new files in tasks/
  • Updated tasks.md with entries in alphabetical order

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 1, 2026

Deploy Preview for openreasoningtasks ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 5ac3f94
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/openreasoningtasks/deploys/697fe6dba4e83e0008dc0c7c
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-29--openreasoningtasks.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@Ridwannurudeen
Copy link
Author

Hi maintainers! Just wanted to follow up on this PR. I've added three blockchain/Web3 reasoning task categories (Smart Contracts, Consensus Mechanisms, and Tokenomics) with 14 total examples.

Happy to make any changes if you have feedback, or answer questions about the approach. No rush, just wanted to make sure this didn't get lost in the queue.

Thanks for your time!

@Ridwannurudeen
Copy link
Author

Second ping on this — adding three blockchain reasoning task categories (Smart Contracts, Consensus Mechanisms, Tokenomics) with 14 examples total. Deploy preview is live and looking good. Happy to revise any tasks that don't fit the format you're looking for.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant