[ADD] survey_sign_oca: survey and sign_oca connector

[kobros-tech]

Because of the nice odoo survey interaction and organized questions and well designed format, there is a need to show the signers a survey and fill, then send them a filled sign request waiting for their approval so that we save time for them and fetch information in an interesting way not a boring one.

The commit is under development and we need to apply the idea in a professional way, and business bearing one!

description, configuration is TODO

based on PR
#91

#102

https://github.com/OCA/survey/#157

[OCA-git-bot]

Hi @etobella,
some modules you are maintaining are being modified, check this out!

[dnplkndll]

@kobros-tech I think you want to make a new module for this connector.

I think there needs to be a complete process review too. if the fields are to map from the sign to the survey should that be able to be created from the sign template?

maybe we could use the US streamlines as a demo item since it covers the most US states and would be able to then create the exemption needed for the tex service.

https://www.streamlinedsalestax.org/docs/default-source/forms/exemption-certificateb926a7ab4a0d43e1ad4fe8eb19e79cbb.pdf?sfvrsn=857843d_5

[kobros-tech]

@kobros-tech I think you want to make a new module for this connector.

I think there needs to be a complete process review too. if the fields are to map from the sign to the survey should that be able to be created from the sign template?

maybe we could use the US streamlines as a demo item since it covers the most US states and would be able to then create the exemption needed for the tex service.

https://www.streamlinedsalestax.org/docs/default-source/forms/exemption-certificateb926a7ab4a0d43e1ad4fe8eb19e79cbb.pdf?sfvrsn=857843d_5

now I improved the field item to be just one "Survey" and according to each one of them I compare the placehloder to the key of the answer, video is showing that.

I didn't want to give my suggestion of creating a new module untill you give me the suggetion on it.

I will try to apply other ones too.

[etobella]

Create a glue module. do not add the dependancy here

[victoralmau]

In addition to #99 (review), I believe the module could be similar to maintenance_sign_oca. Besides, it seems that what is commented in #91 (comment) will also be necessary, right?

[kobros-tech]

In addition to #99 (review), I believe the module could be similar to maintenance_sign_oca. Besides, it seems that what is commented in #91 (comment) will also be necessary, right?

yes, it's better to have it in a separate module, I wish I could as I have to patch some js methods.

[etobella]

We will check the hooks and add them if they have sense. Do not worry about that.

However, I think we shouldn't add unnecessary dependancies on the module.

[kobros-tech]

Now I add a standalone module to connect between sing_oca and survey.

[kobros-tech]

@dnplkndll

[kobros-tech]

If there is a signatur field in the request it will throw error, and it is handle in this PR #102 it is inside sign_oca module.

[kobros-tech]

[kobros-tech]

https://youtu.be/KaGNmiYn7ZM

[kobros-tech]

@victoralmau
for the #91 (comment) commit if you are not going to merge, I really need the field_type to be shown in the form view and allow users to deal with. because if someone delete the data I introduce they can not create it again!.

[kobros-tech]

@etobella
@victoralmau

I removed the dependency from manifest, but still having the external ones. The one related to survey is not critical here and optional, but the one related to sign_oca is important if getting merged otherwise I show the field I want here instead.

Some handy comments are added to, changes are in a separate commit for simplicity for now.

once you agree we transition to test cases.

[kobros-tech]

@wlin-kencove

OCA/survey#180

[kobros-tech]

@victoralmau

Is there anymore comments?

[victoralmau]

Code review OK

[victoralmau]

The proper thing to do would be to use the Survey > Settings option which does not exist, using a new block I think is not the most appropriate, IMO there are 2 possible options:

A- Add those fields to Sign > General settings, inheriting from sign_oca.res_config_settings_view_form.
B- Create a base_survey_config module similar to https://github.com/OCA/maintenance/tree/16.0/base_maintenance_config to add a Survey > Settings menu and have this module depend on the other one.

I think the easiest option in this case is option A.

[kobros-tech]

@etobella
@victoralmau

how about this module?