Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade requests from 2.31.0 to 2.33.0#628

Open
revan-zhang wants to merge 1 commit intotouchfrom
snyk-fix-f667d8396fafd4fad2add0f2a759fdb9
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade requests from 2.31.0 to 2.33.0#628
revan-zhang wants to merge 1 commit intotouchfrom
snyk-fix-f667d8396fafd4fad2add0f2a759fdb9

Conversation

@revan-zhang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@revan-zhang revan-zhang commented Mar 27, 2026

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • python/requirements.txt

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Insecure Temporary File


Open with Devin

Note

Low Risk
Low risk dependency bump that only changes the minimum requests version; any risk is limited to potential HTTP behavior/regression differences in downstream usage.

Overview
Updates the Python dependency floor for requests from >=2.4.0 to >=2.33.0 in python/requirements.txt to address a reported vulnerability.

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 4c3c518. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

The following vulnerabilities are fixed by pinning transitive dependencies:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-REQUESTS-15763443
@revan-zhang revan-zhang requested a review from a team as a code owner March 27, 2026 07:31
@revan-zhang
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

revan-zhang commented Mar 27, 2026

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@cursor cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

Fix All in Cursor

Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

ecdsa>=0.9
mnemonic>=0.20
requests>=2.4.0
requests>=2.33.0
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

New requests minimum breaks declared Python version support

High Severity

The project declares python_requires=">=3.6" in setup.py and even includes dataclasses ; python_version<'3.7' in requirements.txt, but requests>=2.33.0 dropped support for Python 3.9 and below, requiring Python 3.10+. Users on Python 3.6–3.9 will be unable to install this package because pip cannot resolve a compatible requests version. The minimum requests version is now incompatible with the project's own declared Python version support.

Fix in Cursor Fix in Web

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no potential bugs to report.

View in Devin Review to see 1 additional finding.

Open in Devin Review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants