Implemented many 2.7 multis (testing needed) #63
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Hermanoid
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wanted a couple of the machines for my own projects, so I watched Aditya's 2.7 Overview Video and implemented most simpler ones.
Missing implementations for Industrial Precision Lathe, Large Fluid Extractor, Hyper-Intensity Laser Engraver, Psuedostable Black Hole Containment Unit, Godforge stuff. Perhaps Beamline as well, but probably not waterline - with the parallel system, you just scale that up as needed, no fancy math required.
Also, it might be good to test bc basing overclock calculations on descriptions is sometimes unclear/completely untrue.
I did meddle with chem plant, pyrolyse oven, and some other places so I could use the same coil tier listing for new machines as well as those old ones.