When building a robust application, there's a clear hierarchical flow from abstract concepts to concrete implementations.
This hierarchy ensures systematic development where each level builds upon and refines the previous one.
Here's the complete hierarchy for building robust applications:
Purpose: Understanding what needs to be built
Focus: Functional and non-functional requirements, business goals, user stories
Output: Requirements specification, use cases, acceptance criteria
Stakeholders: Business analysts, product managers, stakeholders
Purpose: Defines the fundamental organizational structure of the software
Focus: Architectural patterns, technology stack selection, foundational principles
Output: Architectural blueprint, technology choices (e.g., microservices vs monolith)
Stakeholders: Enterprise architects, principal engineers
Key Decisions: Microservices, Event-Driven, Layered Architecture, Serverless
Purpose: Translates architecture into a deployable system plan
Focus: Infrastructure, scalability, reliability, performance, security
Output: System architecture diagrams, infrastructure plans, deployment strategies
Stakeholders: System architects, DevOps engineers, infrastructure architects
Key Components: Load balancers, databases, caching layers, message queues, monitoring
Purpose: Defines the overall system structure and major components
Focus: Component interactions, data flow, service boundaries, APIs
Output: System diagrams, component specifications, interface definitions
Stakeholders: Solution architects, tech leads, senior engineers
Key Elements: Major modules, service interactions, data models, external integrations
Purpose: Detailed design of individual components and modules
Focus: Class design, algorithms, data structures, method specifications
Output: Class diagrams, sequence diagrams, detailed specifications, pseudocode
Stakeholders: Senior developers, tech leads, development teams
Key Elements: Object-oriented design, SOLID principles, interface definitions
Purpose: Proven solutions to common design problems at the code level
Focus: Reusable design templates, best practices, code organization
Output: Pattern implementations, code templates, design guidelines
Application Level: Applied within LLD for specific implementation challenges
Categories: Creational, Structural, Behavioral patterns
When building a robust application, the process flows systematically:
Phase 1: Strategic Planning
- Requirements Analysis → Software Architecture: Business needs drive architectural decisions
Phase 2: System Planning
- Software Architecture → System Design: Architectural patterns guide infrastructure choices
Phase 3: Detailed Design
- System Design → HLD: Infrastructure requirements shape component design
- HLD → LLD: Component specifications drive detailed implementation design
Phase 4: Implementation
- LLD → Design Patterns: Detailed designs use patterns for specific solutions
| Level | Depends On | Influences | Key Question |
|---|---|---|---|
| Requirements | Business needs | All design decisions | "What should the system do?" |
| Software Architecture | Requirements | System Design approach | "How should we structure the software?" |
| System Design | Software Architecture | Infrastructure and deployment | "How do we build and run this architecture?" |
| HLD | System Design | Component boundaries | "What are the major parts and how do they connect?" |
| LLD | HLD | Code structure | "How is each component implemented internally?" |
| Design Patterns | LLD challenges | Code quality and maintainability | "How do we solve this specific design problem?" |
For HLD: Basic coding skills, understanding of databases, networking, microservices concepts, load balancing, message queues
For LLD: Object-oriented programming, design patterns, data structures and algorithms, SOLID principles
For Design Patterns: Strong OOP knowledge, understanding of common software problems, code refactoring experience
This hierarchical approach ensures that each level provides the foundation for the next, creating a systematic path from business requirements to maintainable code. Without proper execution at each level, the robustness of the final application is compromised.