Skip to content

Conversation

@lakshayman
Copy link
Contributor

Date: 16 Jan 2025

Developer Name: [Your Name]


Description

This PR implements Phase 1, Week 4: Testing & Documentation for the Feature Flag Backend. It adds comprehensive unit tests for the RBAC system and updates documentation to reflect the new authentication and authorization features.

Key Features Implemented:

  1. Comprehensive RBAC Unit Tests

    • Added RBAC_test.go with 30+ test cases
    • Tests for HasPermission() function covering all roles and permissions
    • Tests for RequirePermission() helper function
    • Tests for RequireAnyPermission() helper function
    • Tests for CanAccessUserResource() resource ownership validation
    • Complete permission matrix validation for all three roles (ADMIN, DEVELOPER, VIEWER)
    • Edge case testing (nil user context, unknown roles)
  2. Documentation Updates

    • Authentication Section: Added user registration and login flow documentation
    • RBAC Section: Comprehensive role-based access control documentation
    • Permission Matrix: Visual table showing permissions for each role
    • Resource Ownership Rules: Documentation on who can access which resources
    • API Endpoints: Updated with permission requirements for each endpoint
    • Data Model: Added User table schema documentation
  3. Test Coverage

    • All RBAC permission checks covered
    • All role combinations tested
    • Resource ownership logic validated
    • Edge cases and error scenarios tested

Test Results

All tests passing:

  • TestHasPermission - 9 test cases
  • TestRequirePermission - 4 test cases
  • TestRequireAnyPermission - 4 test cases
  • TestCanAccessUserResource - 5 test cases
  • TestRolePermissions - 30 test cases (complete permission matrix)

Total: 52 test cases, all passing

Documentation Updated?

  • Yes
  • No

Documentation Updates:

  • README.md updated with authentication and RBAC sections
  • API endpoints documented with permission requirements
  • Data model updated to include User table
  • Resource ownership rules documented

Under Feature Flag

  • Yes
  • No

Database Changes

  • Yes
  • No

Database Changes:

  • No schema changes
  • Documentation reflects existing User table structure

Breaking Changes

  • Yes
  • No

Development Tested?

  • Yes
  • No

Testing:

  • ✅ All unit tests pass (52 test cases)
  • ✅ RBAC permission system fully tested
  • ✅ Resource ownership validation tested
  • ✅ Edge cases and error scenarios covered

Test Coverage

Test Coverage Details

Test Coverage Summary

RBAC Permission System:

  • ✅ Permission checking for all roles (ADMIN, DEVELOPER, VIEWER)
  • ✅ All 10 permission types tested
  • ✅ Permission denial scenarios tested
  • ✅ Unknown role handling tested

Helper Functions:

  • RequirePermission() - Success and failure cases
  • RequireAnyPermission() - Multiple permission scenarios
  • CanAccessUserResource() - Ownership validation

Permission Matrix Validation:

  • ✅ ADMIN permissions (10/10 permissions)
  • ✅ DEVELOPER permissions (6/10 permissions)
  • ✅ VIEWER permissions (3/10 permissions)

Edge Cases:

  • ✅ Nil user context handling
  • ✅ Unknown role handling
  • ✅ Resource ownership edge cases

Additional Notes

Test Structure

The test suite follows the existing testing patterns in the codebase:

  • Uses github.com/stretchr/testify/assert for assertions
  • Table-driven tests for comprehensive coverage
  • Clear test names describing the scenario
  • Tests organized by function/feature

Documentation Highlights

New Sections Added:

  1. Authentication: Complete authentication flow documentation
  2. Role-Based Access Control: RBAC system overview
  3. Permission Matrix: Visual permission table
  4. Resource Ownership: Rules for accessing user resources

Updated Sections:

  1. API Endpoints: Now includes permission requirements
  2. Data Model: Includes User table schema

Running Tests

Run all tests

go test ./...

Run RBAC tests specifically

go test ./layer/utils/... -v

Run with coverage

go test ./layer/utils/... -cover### Next Steps

Phase 1 is now complete! The standalone authentication system with RBAC is fully implemented, tested, and documented.

Future Enhancements (Phase 2+):

  • Integration tests with actual DynamoDB
  • End-to-end API tests
  • Performance testing
  • Security audit
  • Group-based feature flags
  • Service integration SDK

Files Changed

  • layer/utils/RBAC_test.go (new - comprehensive RBAC tests)
  • README.md (updated - authentication and RBAC documentation)

Phase 1 Completion Summary:

  1. ✅ Week 1: User service foundation
  2. ✅ Week 2: Authentication migration
  3. ✅ Week 3: Role-based access control
  4. ✅ Week 4: Testing & documentation (this PR)

- Add comprehensive unit tests for RBAC permission system
- Test HasPermission function for all roles and permissions
- Test RequirePermission and RequireAnyPermission helpers
- Test CanAccessUserResource for resource ownership validation
- Test complete permission matrix for ADMIN, DEVELOPER, and VIEWER roles
- Update README with authentication and RBAC documentation
- Add user registration and login endpoint documentation
- Document role-based access control and permission matrix
- Update API endpoints documentation with permission requirements
- Update data model to include User table schema
- Add resource ownership rules documentation
- All RBAC tests passing (30+ test cases)
@lakshayman lakshayman self-assigned this Jan 16, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants