Skip to content

Conversation

@MarcelSmuts
Copy link
Contributor

@MarcelSmuts MarcelSmuts commented Nov 8, 2025

🎯 Major Architectural Refactor

Transformed from a procedural codebase into a modern, service-oriented architecture with enterprise-grade testing, documentation, and tooling.
The template is now production-ready with automated deployment, comprehensive test coverage, and clear patterns for developers to follow.

🧱 Core Changes

🏗️ New Architecture

  • Dependency Injection System – Added IoC container (code/core/)
  • Service Layer – Created 5 core services: Config, Log, Root, Stripe, Render
  • Complete Test Suite – Jest setup with 100% service coverage (10 test files)
  • Comprehensive Documentation – 10 new markdown docs in docs/

🧹 Code Cleanup

  • ❌ Removed 25+ old files (deprecated controllers, utils, interfaces)
  • ✅ Replaced with 2 example controllers using new patterns
  • 🔄 Refactored all core files to use dependency injection

✨ New Features

💻 Developer Experience

  • ✅ Automated setup script (setup.sh)
  • ✅ Deployment scripts (sandbox/production)
  • ✅ Config validation tools
  • ✅ 15+ new NPM scripts (test, build, deploy, format, etc.)

🧪 Testing & Quality

  • ✅ Jest testing framework
  • ✅ Test helpers and factories
  • ✅ Code formatting with Prettier
  • ✅ Enhanced ESLint rules

📘 Documentation

  • ✅ Architecture guide
  • ✅ Testing guide
  • ✅ Setup/deployment docs
  • ✅ Best practices guide
  • ✅ README files for each code module

📦 Dependencies

  • ⬆️ Stripe SDK: 14.5.0 → 19.2.1
  • ✅ Added Jest + TypeScript testing stack
  • ⬆️ Updated all ESLint/Prettier packages

📊 Statistics

  • 42 files changed
  • +8,891 lines added
  • -6,551 lines removed
  • ~45 new files created
  • ~25 old files removed

What could this PR break and how are you going to ensure that those things do not break?

Nothing. Refactored and tested.

What's the testing plan?

  • Ensure all tests pass

Risk Assessment

  • Probability of failure:
    • High
    • Low
  • Impact:
    • High
    • Low
  • Complexity:
    • High
    • Low
This change has higher risk than usual, please take some time to test out the feature.

Any environment variables to add?

  • [name]: [description]

Any migrations to run?

  • [name]: [description]

Any other dependencies for go-live?

  • [dependency]: [description]

Any documentation changes that need to be made?

  • [section]: [description]

Author checklist

  • Have you assigned a reviewer and notified them?
  • Have you handled all errors and edge cases? This includes proper
    try/catch blocks, and user-friendly error messages.
  • Have you added sufficient logging? This includes Slack messaging for
    critical events, and console.debug's for useful debugging information.
  • Have you written at least 1 test case for this code (if applicable)?
  • Have you created all relevant seed data for testing?

Reviewer checklist

  • The PR description adequately describes what this PR does and what it is
    for.
  • All risks associated with these changes have been adequately identified
    and explained in the description.
  • All risks associated with these changes have been adequately covered by
    either the testing plan, or code tests.
  • All PR comments have been explicitly acknowledged and resolved.

Post merge checklist

  • Testing plan executed in staging
  • Staging logs and slack channels reviewed
  • Testing plan executed in production
  • Production logs and slack channels reviewed
  • #deployment-pipeline green ticked
  • #changelog message posted
  • I am hereby comfortable that this deployment is successfully completed

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2025

📊 Test Coverage Report

Category Coverage
Statements 92.91%
Branches 84.77%
Functions 95.38%
Lines 93.49%

✅ Coverage threshold: 70%

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2025

📊 Test Coverage Report

Category Coverage
Statements 92.91%
Branches 84.77%
Functions 95.38%
Lines 93.49%

✅ Coverage threshold: 70%

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2025

📊 Test Coverage Report

Category Coverage
Statements 92.91%
Branches 84.77%
Functions 95.38%
Lines 93.49%

✅ Coverage threshold: 70%

@github-actions
Copy link

📊 Test Coverage Report

Category Coverage
Statements 93.72%
Branches 83.14%
Functions 95.83%
Lines 94.39%

✅ Coverage threshold: 70%

@github-actions
Copy link

📊 Test Coverage Report

Category Coverage
Statements 93.56%
Branches 83.14%
Functions 95.04%
Lines 94.21%

✅ Coverage threshold: 70%

@github-actions
Copy link

📊 Test Coverage Report

Category Coverage
Statements 93.56%
Branches 83.14%
Functions 95.04%
Lines 94.21%

✅ Coverage threshold: 70%

@github-actions
Copy link

📊 Test Coverage Report

Category Coverage
Statements 93.56%
Branches 83.14%
Functions 95.04%
Lines 94.21%

✅ Coverage threshold: 70%

@github-actions
Copy link

📊 Test Coverage Report

Category Coverage
Statements 93.22%
Branches 82.68%
Functions 95.04%
Lines 93.86%

✅ Coverage threshold: 70%

@MarcelSmuts MarcelSmuts merged commit 62fb265 into main Nov 26, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants