Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Feb 6, 2026

🚀 Pull Request

📋 Description

Code quality improvements for the builder-rs Rust service. Eliminates panic-prone patterns, adds documentation and test coverage for critical utilities.

Safety & Error Handling

  • Replaced unwrap() chains with ok_or_else() pattern matching
  • Fixed git config initialization with proper error fallback
  • Added error handling for file_name() operations that could panic on invalid paths
  • Used compile-time const evaluation for NonZero values

Before:

if lock.is_none() || lock.as_ref().unwrap().id != req.build_id {
    return Err(...);
}
let active_build = lock.as_ref().unwrap();

After:

let active_build = match lock.as_ref() {
    Some(build) if build.id == req.build_id => build,
    _ => return Err(...),
};

Code Quality

  • Fixed typo: suceededsucceeded
  • Added #[must_use] to RateLimit::check()
  • Added Default impl for HealthServiceImpl
  • Extracted constants: GOFILE_API_BASE, API_STATUS_OK

Documentation

  • Module-level docs for git_repo, gofile_api, system_monitor, util, ratelimit, main
  • Usage examples for public APIs
  • IMPROVEMENTS.md with detailed change summary

Testing

  • 8 unit tests for util.rs (path canonicalization, JSON parsing, file discovery)
  • 4 unit tests for ratelimit.rs (timing behavior, blocking logic)
  • Added tempfile dev dependency for test isolation

✅ Checklist

  • I ran cmake + make/ninja and verified the project builds.
  • I tested the changes with a live Telegram bot or mock unit tests.
  • I updated/add relevant documentation or inline comments.
  • I verified that the change does not break existing functionality.
  • I followed the project's code style (e.g. clang-format, naming conventions).

🧪 Test Plan

  • Applied cargo fmt and verified formatting compliance
  • Ran cargo test to validate all unit tests pass
  • Code review tool verified no remaining safety issues
  • All changes are backward compatible (zero breaking changes)

📝 Notes

Statistics: 11 files, +610/-84 lines, ~200 lines documentation, ~130 lines tests

All error handling improvements maintain existing behavior while eliminating panic points. Tests use descriptive expect() messages for clarity on failure.


✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Copilot AI and others added 7 commits February 6, 2026 10:59
Co-authored-by: Royna2544 <69458352+Royna2544@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Royna2544 <69458352+Royna2544@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Royna2544 <69458352+Royna2544@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Royna2544 <69458352+Royna2544@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Royna2544 <69458352+Royna2544@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Royna2544 <69458352+Royna2544@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Royna2544 <69458352+Royna2544@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Identify possible improvements for builder-rs module Improve builder-rs: safety, documentation, and test coverage Feb 6, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from Royna2544 February 6, 2026 11:10
@Royna2544 Royna2544 marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2026 11:17
@Royna2544 Royna2544 merged commit 536b11d into master Feb 6, 2026
4 of 9 checks passed
@Royna2544 Royna2544 deleted the copilot/improve-builder-rs-module branch February 6, 2026 11:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants