Skip to content

Conversation

@Ziedelth
Copy link
Contributor

@Ziedelth Ziedelth commented Dec 9, 2025

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Ziedelth, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the security and robustness of the application's Docker deployment. It introduces best practices for container security by configuring the application to run as a non-root user and refines the Playwright browser installation process for better control. Additionally, the Docker Compose healthcheck has been updated to use a more native Node.js-based method for service verification, ensuring more reliable monitoring of the application's health.

Highlights

  • Dockerfile Security Enhancements: Introduced a dedicated non-root user (appuser) and group to run the application within the Docker container, significantly improving the security posture by adhering to the principle of least privilege. This includes creating the user, setting appropriate ownership for application directories, and switching to this user before running the main application command.
  • Playwright Browser Path Configuration: Explicitly defined and configured the PLAYWRIGHT_BROWSERS_PATH environment variable and created the corresponding directory (/opt/playwright) to manage where Playwright browsers are installed and accessed within the container.
  • Docker Compose Healthcheck Update: Replaced the curl-based healthcheck in docker-compose.yml with a more robust node -e script. This change provides a more native and potentially more reliable method for verifying the service's availability and responsiveness within the Node.js-based container environment.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request significantly improves the security of the Docker image by introducing a non-root user and removing the curl package. These are excellent changes that follow security best practices. My review includes a few suggestions to further enhance the Dockerfile for better determinism and smaller image size, as well as a recommendation to improve the maintainability of the healthcheck in docker-compose.yml.

@Ziedelth Ziedelth force-pushed the add-security-on-dockerfile branch 7 times, most recently from c4d4af0 to e3c9907 Compare December 16, 2025 10:25
@Ziedelth Ziedelth force-pushed the add-security-on-dockerfile branch from e3c9907 to 437c4aa Compare December 16, 2025 10:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants