Skip to content

[POC] Poll and Sockets#128

Draft
jenshenny wants to merge 82 commits intomasterfrom
safari-fallback
Draft

[POC] Poll and Sockets#128
jenshenny wants to merge 82 commits intomasterfrom
safari-fallback

Conversation

@jenshenny
Copy link

What was the end-user or developer problem that led to this PR?

What is your fix for the problem, implemented in this PR?

Make sure the following tasks are checked

dependabot bot and others added 21 commits June 26, 2023 15:58
Bumps [ossf/scorecard-action](https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action) from 2.1.3 to 2.2.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/ossf/scorecard-action/blob/main/RELEASE.md)
- [Commits](ossf/scorecard-action@80e868c...08b4669)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: ossf/scorecard-action
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Bumps [dtolnay/rust-toolchain](https://github.com/dtolnay/rust-toolchain) from fc3253060d0c959bea12a59f10f8391454a0b02d to 0e66bd3e6b38ec0ad5312288c83e47c143e6b09e.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/dtolnay/rust-toolchain/releases)
- [Commits](dtolnay/rust-toolchain@fc32530...0e66bd3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: dtolnay/rust-toolchain
  dependency-type: direct:production
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
…dtolnay/rust-toolchain-0e66bd3e6b38ec0ad5312288c83e47c143e6b09e

Bump dtolnay/rust-toolchain from fc3253060d0c959bea12a59f10f8391454a0b02d to 0e66bd3e6b38ec0ad5312288c83e47c143e6b09e
…ossf/scorecard-action-2.2.0

Bump ossf/scorecard-action from 2.1.3 to 2.2.0
Changelogs for RubyGems 3.4.15 and Bundler 2.4.15
Exclude test files from release package
When dependencies in path sources have changed, we'll be re-resolving,
and we can't really know whether the resolution will be valid or invalid
for the Ruby platform, so skip the removal in that case.
deivid-rodriguez and others added 27 commits July 10, 2023 19:05
Changelogs for RubyGems 3.4.16 and Bundler 2.4.16
…sages

Avoid printing "Using ..." messages when version has not changed
Avoid unnecessary work for private local gem installation
Previously, when sorting and comparing git Gemfile vs lockfile sources during
`bundler/setup` to figure out whether we need to re-resolve or not, we
would try to find the default branch if nothing more specific was
specified in the Gemfile.

If the git cache has been deleted thought, that would fail.

The error would still be swallowed (and the branch would simply not be
displayed), but trying to clone would still generate the side effect of
creating the parent folder for the clone.

That could affect non-writable systems that don't expect `bundler/setup`
to write to the filesystem at all.

To fix this, override `Bundler::Source::Git#identifier` to use
exclusively static information, so it does not even try to clone the
repo nor generate any side effects.
## What was the end-user or developer problem that led to this PR?

The old URL https://github.com/testdouble/standard is mentioned.

## What is your fix for the problem, implemented in this PR?

This PR updates to the new URL https://github.com/standardrb/standard.
Update GitHub organization of Standard Ruby
Fix `bundler/setup` unintendedly writing to the filesystem
…ndler

Introduce bundle config set version feature
Changelogs for RubyGems 3.4.17 and Bundler 2.4.17
Fix directory of cargo test app in Dependabot
Bumps [rb-sys](https://github.com/oxidize-rb/rb-sys) from 0.9.58 to 0.9.79.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/oxidize-rb/rb-sys/releases)
- [Commits](oxidize-rb/rb-sys@v0.9.58...v0.9.79)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: rb-sys
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
…gems/test_gem_ext_cargo_builder/custom_name/ext/custom_name_lib/rb-sys-0.9.79

Bump rb-sys from 0.9.58 to 0.9.79 in /test/rubygems/test_gem_ext_cargo_builder/custom_name/ext/custom_name_lib
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants